Cited by 83Online Learning and AnalyticsEducational Technology and PedagogyIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Scalability, Sustainability, and Ethicality of Multimodal Learning Analytics

Yan, Lixiang, Zhao, Linxuan, Gasevic, Dragan, Martinez-Maldonado, Roberto·2022·LAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Multimodal Learning Analytics (MMLA) innovations are commonly aimed at supporting learners in physical learning spaces through state-of-the-art sensing technologies and analysis techniques. Although a growing body of MMLA research has demonstrated the potential benefits of sensor-based technologies in education, whether their use can be scalable, sustainable, and ethical remains questionable. Such uncertainty can limit future research and the potential adoption of MMLA by educational stakeholders in authentic learning situations. To address this, we systematically reviewed the methodological, operational, and ethical challenges faced by current MMLA works that can affect the scalability and sustainability of future MMLA innovations. A total of 96 peer-reviewed articles published after 2010 were included. The findings were summarised into three recommendations, including i) improving reporting standards by including sufficient details about sensors, analysis techniques, and the full disclosure of evaluation metrics, ii) fostering interdisciplinary collaborations among experts in learning analytics, software, and hardware engineering to develop affordable sensors and upgrade MMLA innovations that used discontinued technologies, and iii) developing ethical guidelines to address the potential risks of bias, privacy, and equality concerns with using MMLA innovations. Through these future research directions, MMLA can remain relevant and eventually have actual impacts on educational practices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3506860.3506862

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar replication issues have also been identified in other areas of educational technology research.

    “Similar replication issues have also been identified in other areas of educational technology research (Yan et al., 2022).”
  • The assessment tool adopted for technology readiness was the Australian Department of Defence's Technology Readiness Levels (TRL), which has been used to assess the maturity of educational technologies in prior systematic literature reviews.

    “We adopted the assessment tool from the Australian government, namely the Australian Department of Defence's Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) (Defence Science and Technology Group, 2021), which has been used to assess the maturity of educational technologies in prior SLR(Yan et al., 2022).”
  • Transformer models employ advanced attention mechanisms to achieve enhanced contextual processing, allowing for more subtle understanding and interaction.

    “They employ advanced attention mechanisms to achieve enhanced contextual processing, allowing for more subtle understanding and interaction [142], [143], [144].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yan, L., Zhao, L., Gasevic, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Monash University, Australia
Venue
LAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference
Publisher
ACM
Published
2022-03-21
Pages
13-23
OpenAlex
W4214842915
Cited by
83
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 3
FWCI
23.49
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) (publishedVersion)
  • EdArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council (DP210100060)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
multimodal learning analytics, scalability, sustainability, ethics, physical learning environment, reporting guidelines, interdisciplinary collaboration, privacy, algorithmic bias, educational technology adoption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review