Cited by 117Media Studies and CommunicationCommunication and COVID-19 ImpactMedia Influence and Health

Is the news making us unhappy? The influence of daily news exposure on emotional states

Open access
de Hoog, Natascha, Verboon, Peter·2020·British Journal of Psychology

Abstract

There is evidence that exposure to negative news is making people feel bad, but not much is known about why this only affects some people or whether this also applies to everyday news exposure. This study examined the direct and indirect effects of daily news exposure on people's affective states. Using ecological momentary assessment (EMA), 63 respondents (24 men and 39 women) reported their news exposure and affective states five times a day for 10 days. In addition, personal relevance of the news and personality characteristics, neuroticism and extraversion, were assessed. Results showed that negative news perceptions were related to more negative affect and less positive affect, and these effects were moderated by personal relevance, but not personality characteristics. The implications of these outcomes are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjop.12389

Cites

68 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Hoog, N., & Verboon, P.
Affiliations
  • Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences Open University of the Netherlands Heerlen The Netherlands
  • Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
Venue
British Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-03-21
Volume
111
Issue
2
Pages
157-173
ISSN
  • 0007-1269 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8295
OpenAlex
W2923603699
Cited by
117
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 7
FWCI
27.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
negative news, affective states, negative affect, positive affect, neuroticism, extraversion, personality moderators, emotional well-being
MeSH terms
Ecological Momentary Assessment, Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Media, Middle Aged, Personality, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review