Cited by 40

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Early and Sustained Activation of Autophagy in Degenerating Axons after Spinal Cord Injury

Ribas, Vinicius Toledo, Schnepf, Bianca, Challagundla, Malleswari, Koch, Jan Christoph, Bähr, Mathias, Lingor, Paul·2015·Brain Pathology

Abstract

Axonal degeneration is one of the initial steps in many neurological disorders and has been associated with increased autophagic activity. Although there are increasing data on the regulation of autophagy proteins in the neuronal soma after spinal cord injury (SCI), their characterization in the axon is scarce. Here, we examined the regulation of autophagy during axonal degeneration in a rat model of SCI following a lesion at Th 8. We analyzed the morphological and ultrastructural changes in injured axons by immunohistochemical evaluation of autophagy‐related proteins and electron microscopy at different time points following SCI. The expression of ULK 1, A tg7 and A tg5 in damaged axons was rapidly upregulated within hours after SCI. The number of axonal LC 3‐positive autophagosomes was also rapidly increased after SCI and remained at an increased level for up to 6 weeks. Ultrastructural analysis showed early signs of axonal degeneration and increased autophagy. In conclusion, we show that autophagy is increased early and for a sustained period in degenerating axons after SCI and that it might be an important executive step involved in axonal degeneration. Therefore, autophagy may represent a promising target for future therapeutic interventions in the treatment of axonal degeneration in traumatic central nervous system disorders.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bpa.12170

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1074/jbc.M703663200 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5519-10.2011 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/embor.2008.163 · DOI
  4. 10.1074/jbc.M112.365767 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.06.004 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/s12264-013-1355-6 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/nature04724 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.3171/2014.1.SPINE13237 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/35044114 · DOI
  10. 10.4161/auto.6.6.12709 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1091/mbc.e08-12-1249 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1093/emboj/19.21.5720 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.09.009 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1038/nm1229 · DOI
  15. 10.1073/pnas.0909794107 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1007/s00441-012-1362-3 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1038/26506 · DOI
  18. 10.1083/jcb.152.4.657 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1126/science.1068613 · DOI
  20. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-06-03934.1994 · DOI
  21. 10.4161/auto.1.1.1513 · DOI
  22. 10.1073/pnas.1100844108 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1038/nnano.2009.303 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2006.00001.x · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s12035-013-8518-3 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.tins.2013.04.001 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05914.x · DOI
  28. 10.4161/auto.5431 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.11.014 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.4161/auto.3602 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 40

Metadata

Authors
Ribas, V. T., Schnepf, B., Challagundla, M., Koch, J. C., Bähr, M., & Lingor, P.
Affiliations
Department of Neurology University Medicine Göttingen Göttingen Germany
Venue
Brain Pathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-09-12
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
157-170
ISSN
  • 1015-6305
  • 1750-3639
Cited by
40
References
7
Language
en
Funders
  • International Foundation for Research in Paraplegia (IRP - P 112)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (LI 1308/3-1)
  • Center for Nanoscale Microscopy and Molecular Physiology of the Brain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review