The DOI matches its Crossref record; 321 of the 321 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sex differences in animal models of psychiatric disorders
Open accessAbstract
Psychiatric disorders are characterized by sex differences in their prevalence, symptomatology and treatment response. Animal models have been widely employed for the investigation of the neurobiology of such disorders and the discovery of new treatments. However, mostly male animals have been used in preclinical pharmacological studies. In this review, we highlight the need for the inclusion of both male and female animals in experimental studies aiming at gender‐oriented prevention, diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric disorders. We present behavioural findings on sex differences from animal models of depression, anxiety, post‐traumatic stress disorder, substance‐related disorders, obsessive–compulsive disorder, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and autism. Moreover, when available, we include studies conducted across different stages of the oestrous cycle. By inspection of the relevant literature, it is obvious that robust sex differences exist in models of all psychiatric disorders. However, many times results are conflicting, and no clear conclusion regarding the direction of sex differences and the effect of the oestrous cycle is drawn. Moreover, there is a lack of considerable amount of studies using psychiatric drugs in both male and female animals, in order to evaluate the differential response between the two sexes. Notably, while in most cases animal models successfully mimic drug response in both sexes, test parameters and treatment‐sensitive behavioural indices are not always the same for male and female rodents. Thus, there is an increasing need to validate animal models for both sexes and use standard procedures across different laboratories. Linked Articles: This article is part of a themed section on Animal Models in Psychiatry Research. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2014.171.issue-20
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The size and burden of mental disorders and other disorders of the brain in Europe 2010
Wittchen, H. U., Jacobi, F., Rehm, J., Gustavsson, A., Svensson, M., Jönsson, B., Olesen, J., Allgulander, C., Alonso, J., Faravelli, C., et al. (2011) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.07.018 · Cited by 3,754
Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight.
Taylor, S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., Gruenewald, T. L., Gurung, R. A. R., & Updegraff, J. A. (2000) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.107.3.411 · Cited by 3,308
Willner, P., Towell, A., Sampson, D., Sophokleous, S., & Muscat, R. (1987) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf00187257 · Cited by 1,993
Willner, P. (1997) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s002130050456 · Cited by 1,832
Sex bias in neuroscience and biomedical research
Beery, A. K., & Zucker, I. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.07.002 · Cited by 1,763
Willner, P. (2005) · Neuropsychobiology · doi:10.1159/000087097 · Cited by 1,605
Assessing antidepressant activity in rodents: recent developments and future needs
Cryan, J. F., Markou, A., & Lucki, I. (2002) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0165-6147(02)02017-5 · Cited by 1,551 · cited 2×
“Importantly, antidepressant treatment enhances the duration of active behaviours in the FST and decreases the duration of passive behaviours (Cryan et al., 2002; 2005).”
BackgroundWhy sex matters for neuroscience
Cahill, L. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1909 · Cited by 1,540
Detke, M. J., Rickels, M., & Lucki, I. (1995) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf02245592 · Cited by 1,433
Rauch, S. L., Shin, L. M., & Phelps, E. A. (2006) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.06.004 · Cited by 1,397
Cited by
Pathogenesis of depression: Insights from human and rodent studies
Ménard, C., Hodes, G. E., & Russo, S. J. (2016) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.05.053 · Cited by 593
Sex differences in anxiety and depression: circuits and mechanisms
Bangasser, D. A., & Cuarenta, A. (2021) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-021-00513-0 · Cited by 479
Radley, J., Morilak, D., Viau, V., & Campeau, S. (2015) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.06.018 · Cited by 339
Let’s call the whole thing off: evaluating gender and sex differences in executive function
Grissom, N. M., & Reyes, T. M. (2019) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-018-0179-5 · Cited by 306
The future of rodent models in depression research
Gururajan, A., Reif, A., Cryan, J. F., & Slattery, D. A. (2019) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-019-0221-6 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Kokras, N., & Dalla, C.
- Venue
- British Journal of Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 171
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 4595-4619
- ISSN
- 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5381
- OpenAlex
- W1558137567
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 321
- FWCI
- 24.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sex differences in animal models of psychiatric disorders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/bph.12710
- The paper
- Kokras, N., & Dalla, C. (2014). Sex differences in animal models of psychiatric disorders. British Journal of Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.12710
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.