Cited by 70Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Willing to Think Hard? The Subjective Value of Cognitive Effort in Children

Open access
Chevalier, Nicolas·2018·Child Development

Abstract

Cognitive effort is costly and this cost likely influences the activities in which children engage. Yet, little is known about how school-age children perceive cognitive effort. The subjective value of cognitive effort, that is, how valuable or costly effort is perceived, was investigated in seventy-three 7- to 12-year-olds using an effort discounting paradigm. In two studies, it varied with task difficulty but not age, was predicted by actual effort engagement but not actual success and related to trait interest in effortful activities and proactive control engagement. Children are sensitive to cognitive effort and use it to guide behaviors, suggesting that poor performance may often reflect reluctance to engage cognitive effort rather than low ability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cdev.12805

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on cognitive effort suggests children often avoid tasks they perceive as cognitively demanding, even when those tasks may lead to more meaningful or rewarding outcomes long term.

    “This behavior may be partially explained by research on cognitive effort: children often avoid tasks they perceive as cognitively demanding, even when those tasks may lead to more meaningful or rewarding outcomes in the long term [13].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chevalier, N.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Chevalier, Nicolas
Venue
Child Development
Published
2018-07-01
Volume
89
Issue
4
Pages
1283-1295
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W2587738328
Cited by
70
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4
FWCI
5.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland (70033)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/N018877/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
cognitive effort, subjective value, effort discounting, children, task difficulty, proactive control, effort aversion, elementary school students
MeSH terms
Achievement, Child, Cognition, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Motivation, Perception, Thinking, Delay Discounting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review