Cited by 105Connective tissue disorders researchDermatological and Skeletal DisordersOral and gingival health research

Contemporary approach to joint hypermobility and related disorders

Castori, Marco, Hakim, Alan·2017·Current Opinion in Pediatrics

Abstract

Purpose of review Joint hypermobility is a common, although largely ignored physical sign. Joint hypermobility is often asymptomatic but may be a feature of an underlying genetic disorder with systemic manifestations. The present article presents a comprehensive approach to considering joint hypermobility and clinically related issues in children and adults. Recent findings Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) is an umbrella term for various Mendelian connective tissue disorders sharing joint hypermobility, skin hyperextensibility, and tissue fragility. Hypermobile EDS is the default diagnosis in many individuals and still lacks of any confirmatory test. There is also a continuous spectrum of phenotypes between asymptomatic, nonsyndromic joint hypermobility, and hypermobile EDS. In 2017, a new international classification of EDSs, joint hypermobility, and related disorders was published. EDSs are now classified in 13 different variants because of mutations in 19 genes. The gap between joint hypermobility and hypermobile EDS is filled by the descriptive diagnosis of 'hypermobility spectrum disorders'. Alongside the new criteria recommendations for the assessment and management of selected issues related to joint hypermobility such as fatigue and physical therapy have also been published by expert panels. Summary Asymptomatic, nonsyndromic joint hypermobility, hypermobility spectrum disorders and EDS (particularly, the hypermobile type) are the most common phenotypes in children and ad…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mop.0000000000000541

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castori, M., & Hakim, A.
Affiliations
  • Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza (IT)
  • Hospital of St John & St Elizabeth (GB)
Corresponding author
Castori, Marco
Venue
Current Opinion in Pediatrics
Published
2017-12
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
640-649
ISSN
  • 1040-8703 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-698X
OpenAlex
W2755436179
Cited by
105
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Dermatological and Skeletal Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Oral and gingival health research
Keywords
joint hypermobility, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, hypermobility spectrum disorders, connective tissue diseases, fatigue, physiotherapy
MeSH terms
Diagnosis, Differential, Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, Humans, Joint Instability, Phenotype

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review