Cited by 39Circadian rhythm and melatoninPhysical Activity and HealthSleep and related disorders

Physical activity, sleep duration and metabolic health in children fluctuate with the lunar cycle: science behind the myth

Open access
Sjödin, A., Hjorth, M. F., Damsgaard, C. T., Ritz, C., Astrup, A., Michaelsen, K. F.·2015·Clinical Obesity

Abstract

Summary: Behaviours of several animal species have been linked to lunar periodicity. Evidence for such links in humans is weak; however, recently, shorter sleep duration was reported around full moon in two small samples of adults. As restrictions in sleep duration have been shown to adversely affect glucose regulation and physical activity to improve glucose regulation, one could speculate that cardiometabolic risk factors might also be affected by the lunar phase. We retrospectively examined 795 D anish children, aged 8–11 years, with more than 13 000 24‐h accelerometer recordings of activity and sleep as well as 2000 measurements of different cardiometabolic risk factors, including insulin sensitivity, appetite hormones and blood pressure, during nine lunar phases. During the period around full moon, children were 5.0 and 3.2 min per day less active, slept 2.4 and 4.1 min per night longer, had 0.03 and 0.05 higher homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance and 0.6 and 0.8 mm H g higher mean arterial blood pressure compared with days around half moon and new moon, respectively (all P ≤ 0.02). Furthermore, ghrelin was lower and leptin was higher during the period around full moon compared with days around half moon (both P < 0.001). The results suggest that physical activity rather than sleep is responsible for the metabolic alterations observed around full moon. However, we have no understanding of potential mechanisms that may mediate a potential true link between childhood behaviour and the lunar cycle or confounders that may explain this, apparently leading to fluctuation in a number of cardiometabolic risk markers conjointly with lunar phases.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In 795 Danish children aged 8–11 years, physical activity, sleep duration, and several cardiometabolic risk markers varied with lunar phase, with less activity, slightly longer sleep, higher insulin resistance, and higher blood pressure around full moon. The authors suggest physical activity rather than sleep may explain the metabolic differences, but state that mechanisms and possible confounders remain unknown.

Key findings

  • Around full moon, children were 5.0 and 3.2 min/day less physically active and slept 2.4 and 4.1 min/night longer compared with half moon and new moon, respectively (all P ≤ 0.02).
  • HOMAIR was 0.03 and 0.05 higher, and mean arterial blood pressure was 0.6 and 0.8 mmHg higher, around full moon compared with half moon and new moon (all P ≤ 0.02); insulin, glucose, and diastolic blood pressure were also higher at full moon (all P ≤ 0.04).
  • Ghrelin was 29 pg/mL lower and leptin was 1.2 pg/mL higher at full moon compared with half moon (both P < 0.001).
  • No lunar-phase differences were found for sedentary time, light physical activity, CRP, IL-6, adiponectin, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, or resting heart rate (all P > 0.15). Correlations were reported between moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and sleep duration (r = −0.12, P = 0.01), moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and HOMAIR (r = −0.25, P < 0.001), and sleep duration and HOMAIR (r = −0.16, P < 0.001).

Methods

  • Retrospective analysis of 795 children aged 8–11 years from nine Danish municipal schools in the OPUS school meal study, using data from three measurement periods and 13,464 daytime activity observations, 13,762 sleep observations, and 2,005–2,148 cardiometabolic observations across nine lunar cycles.
  • Children wore hip-mounted ActiGraph accelerometers for seven consecutive days and eight nights; sleep duration was estimated from parent/child bedtime logs plus the Sadeh algorithm, and cardiometabolic markers included fasting glucose, insulin, HOMAIR, blood pressure, ghrelin, leptin, CRP, IL-6, adiponectin, and blood lipids.
  • An available-case linear mixed model with school, class, and subject as random effects and weekday, month, age, gender, Tanner stage, number of parents born in Denmark, and parental education as fixed effects compared full moon ±4 d with half moon ±5–9 d and new moon ±10–14 d.

Limitations

  • The paper states that it lacks understanding of potential mechanisms linking childhood behaviour and the lunar cycle, and of confounders that could explain the associations.
  • The authors state that the sleep-duration differences were small and of questionable biological relevance, that accelerometers cannot detect sleep stages, and that fixed weekday wake times for school may have limited the ability to detect sleep effects.
  • The paper notes that P-values were not adjusted for multiple testing, though it indicates which significant associations vanished after Bonferroni adjustment; it is also an observational study, so causality cannot be inferred, and findings are from Danish children aged 8–11 years, which may limit generalizability.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cob.12092

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 16 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Sleep duration was 4.1 min per night longer at full moon compared with new moon.

    “As shown in Table 2, accelerometer-determined moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was 5.0 and 3.2 min per day lower (both P < 0.001) and sleep duration was 2.4 and 4.1 min per night longer (all P ≤ 0.02) at full moon compared with half moon and new moon, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was negatively correlated with sleep duration (r = −0.12, P = 0.01).

    “we tested and found a negative correlation between moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and sleep duration (r = −0.12, P = 0.01)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Mean arterial blood pressure was 0.6 mmHg higher at full moon compared with half moon.

    “had 0.03 and 0.05 higher homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance and 0.6 and 0.8 mmHg higher mean arterial blood pressure compared with days around half moon and new moon, respectively (all P ≤ 0.02).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Leptin was 1.2 pg/mL higher at full moon compared with half moon.

    “Furthermore, leptin was 1.2 pg mL−1 higher and ghrelin 29 pg mL−1 lower at full moon compared with half moon (both P < 0.001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    HOMAIR was 0.05 higher at full moon compared with new moon.

    “had 0.03 and 0.05 higher homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance and 0.6 and 0.8 mmHg higher mean arterial blood pressure compared with days around half moon and new moon, respectively (all P ≤ 0.02).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims. 6
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 7
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Mean arterial blood pressure was 0.8 mmHg higher at full moon compared with new moon.

    “had 0.03 and 0.05 higher homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance and 0.6 and 0.8 mmHg higher mean arterial blood pressure compared with days around half moon and new moon, respectively (all P ≤ 0.02).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    No differences according to lunar phase were found for time spent sedentary, light physical activity, CRP, IL-6, adiponectin, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides or resting heart rate.

    “No differences according to lunar phase were found for time spent sedentary, light physical activity, CRP, IL-6, adiponectin, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides or resting heart rate (all P > 0.15).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Bonferroni adjustment resulted in non-significant differences in insulin and glucose between full moon and half moon; all other significant associations remained.

    “Bonferroni adjustment resulted in non-significant differences in insulin (P = 0.08) and glucose (P = 0.06) between full moon and half moon; however, all other significant associations remained.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    This is the first study to demonstrate that variations in sleep duration and daytime physical activity are associated with the lunar circle and that a number of cardiometabolic risk markers fluctuated in accordance with this.

    “This is the first study to demonstrate that variations in sleep duration as well as in daytime physical activity are associated with the lunar circle (∼29.5 d) and, furthermore, that a number of cardiometabolic risk markers fluctuated in accordance with this.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Presented P-values were not adjusted for multiple testing.

    “Presented P-values were not adjusted for multiple testing but significant associations vanishing after Bonferroni adjustment were indicated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Sleep duration was negatively affected around full moon in two small samples of adults.

    “It has, however, recently been reported that sleep duration was negatively affected around full moon in two small samples of adults 4,5.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [4] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [5] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Children were less physically active during full moon and this coincided with biologically meaningful differences in several cardiometabolic risk factors, including lower insulin sensitivity and higher blood pressure, while blood lipid profile, adiponectin and markers of inflammation were not affected.

    “However, we found that children were also less physically active during this period and furthermore that this coincided with biologically meaningful differences in several cardiometabolic risk factors, including lower insulin sensitivity and higher blood pressure, while the blood lipid profile, adiponectin and markers of inflammation were not affected.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Daytime activity was only considered valid if monitor wear time was at least 10 h per day.

    “Daytime activity was only considered valid if monitor wear time was at least 10 h per day.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Physical activity has the potential to improve glucose regulation.

    “physical activity has the potential to improve glucose regulation 7”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The school meal intervention did not affect physical activity, sedentary time and sleep duration.

    “As the school meal intervention did not affect physical activity, sedentary time and sleep duration 9”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The classifications of lunar phases used are identical to those used in recently published papers.

    “These classifications of lunar phases are identical to what have been used in recently published papers 4,5,19 using information from a full moon calendar 20.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [4] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [5] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [19] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [20]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Changes from summer to winter time and from winter to summer time were excluded from data analysis.

    “Changes from summer to winter time (clock set back by 1 h) and from winter to summer time were excluded from data analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The linear mixed model approach removes differences between children before estimates are calculated.

    “Finally, the linear mixed model approach removes differences between children before estimates are calculated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Gravitational forces cannot explain our findings because large differences in behaviour and metabolic risk markers were found between full moon ±4 d and ±10-14 d from full moon, periods that both coincide with spring tides.

    “However, as we find large differences in behaviour and metabolic risk markers between full moon ±4 d and ±10–14 d from full moon, periods that both coincide with spring tides, these gravitational forces cannot explain our findings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
14 of 14

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Zeitlhofer J, 2004, Is there a lunar effect on subjective and objective ratings of sleep quality?, J Sleep Res, 13, 822

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sjödin, A., Hjorth, M. F., Damsgaard, C. T., Ritz, C., Astrup, A., & Michaelsen, K. F.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Hjorth, M. F.
Venue
Clinical Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-03-23
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
60-66
ISSN
  • 1758-8103 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-8111
OpenAlex
W1761589617
Cited by
39
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3
FWCI
2.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Obesity (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Nordea-fonden (02-2010-478 0389)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
lunar cycle, full moon, physical activity, sleep duration, cardiometabolic risk factors, insulin resistance, ghrelin, leptin, blood pressure, children, accelerometer-measured activity, appetite-regulating hormones
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Blood Pressure, Child, Female, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Lipids, Male, Motor Activity, Periodicity, Retrospective Studies, Sleep, Moon, Leptin, Ghrelin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review