CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 111

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Defining and Evaluating the Umbrella Species Concept for Conserving and Restoring Landscape Connectivity

BRECKHEIMER, IAN, HADDAD, NICK M., MORRIS, WILLIAM F., TRAINOR, ANNE M., FIELDS, WILLIAM R., JOBE, R. TODD, HUDGENS, BRIAN R., MOODY, AARON, WALTERS, JEFFREY R.·2014·Conservation Biology
DOI 10.1111/cobi.12362
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Conserving or restoring landscape connectivity between patches of breeding habitat is a common strategy to protect threatened species from habitat fragmentation. By managing connectivity for some species, usually charismatic vertebrates, it is often assumed that these species will serve as conservation umbrellas for other species. We tested this assumption by developing a quantitative method to measure overlap in dispersal habitat of 3 threatened species—a bird (the umbrella), a butterfly, and a frog—inhabiting the same fragmented landscape. Dispersal habitat was determined with Circuitscape, which was parameterized with movement data collected for each species. Despite differences in natural history and breeding habitat, we found substantial overlap in the spatial distributions of areas important for dispersal of this suite of taxa. However, the intuitive umbrella species (the bird) did not have the highest overlap with other species in terms of the areas that supported connectivity. Nevertheless, we contend that when there are no irreconcilable differences between the dispersal habitats of species that cohabitate on the landscape, managing for umbrella species can help conserve or restore connectivity simultaneously for multiple threatened species with different habitat requirements. Definición y Evaluación del Concepto de Especie Paraguas para Conservar y Restaurar la Conectividad de Paisajes

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cobi.12362

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies have shown that corridors designed for wide-ranging umbrella species enhance connectivity for less vagile organisms with similar habitat requirements.

    “Several studies (e.g., Epps et al. 2011; Breckheimer et al. 2014) have shown that corridors designed for wide-ranging umbrella species enhance connectivity for less vagile organisms with similar habitat requirements, and Brodie et al. (2015) showed that multi-species corridors tailored to ecologically similar species (e.g., carnivores and herbivores) can be highly effective for all species.”

    From Circuit‐theory applications to connectivity science and conservation (2019) · cites this paper as Breckheimer et al. 2014

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00242-6 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1073/pnas.100126797 · DOI
  3. Beane J. C., 2010, Amphibians and reptiles of the Carolinas and Virginia
  4. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00942.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1890/08-1898.1 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Burnham K. P., 2002, Model selection and multi‐model inference: a practical information‐theoretic approach
  7. Caro T. M., 2010, Conservation by proxy: indicator, umbrella, keystone, flagship, and other surrogate species
  8. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00674.x · DOI · Paper page
  9. Conner R. N., 2001, The Red‐cockaded Woodpecker, surviving in a fire‐maintained ecosystem
  10. 10.1017/CBO9780511754821 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.02.011 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1007/s10531-013-0541-1 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1126/science.1130098 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00263.x · DOI
  15. Fields W. R.2012.Ecology and conservation of rare amphibians. PhD Thesis North Carolina State University.
  16. 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0569:ANMFSO]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01450.x · DOI
  18. 10.1126/science.281.5385.2045 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0609:CUBDT]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  20. 10.1890/03-5327 · DOI
  21. Hilty J. A., 2006, Corridor ecology: the science and practice of linking landscapes for biodiversity conservation
  22. 10.1890/11-1048.1 · DOI
  23. 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.980208.x · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.08.030 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/BF00379695 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1093/beheco/arq158 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/jwmg.330 · DOI
  28. 10.1890/09-0614.1 · DOI
  29. 10.1674/0003-0031(2008)159[298:DPSAHU]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  30. 10.1371/journal.pone.0052604 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1007/s10841-011-9413-8 · DOI
  32. 10.2307/3802123 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00450.x · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.10.007 · DOI
  35. 10.1676/0043-5643(2002)114[0235:RCWFBI]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.03.001 · DOI
  37. Turchin P., 1998, Quantitative analysis of movement: measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants
  38. 10.1007/s10980-013-9861-5 · DOI
  39. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2003, Recovery plan for the Red‐cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis): second revision, 296
  40. 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.014 · DOI
  41. 10.2307/3802938 · DOI
  42. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00250.x · DOI
  43. 10.2307/1313420 · DOI
  44. Zeller K. A., 2014, Sensitivity of landscape resistance estimates based on point selection functions to scale and behavioral state: pumas as a case study, Landscape Ecology, 2014, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
BRECKHEIMER, I., HADDAD, N. M., MORRIS, W. F., TRAINOR, A. M., FIELDS, W. R., JOBE, R. T., HUDGENS, B. R., MOODY, A., & WALTERS, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Department of Biology University of Washington Box 351800 Seattle WA 98195 U.S.A.
  • Department of Biological Science North Carolina State University Box 7617 Raleigh NC 27695 U.S.A.
  • Department of Biology Duke University 125 Science Drive Durham NC 27708 U.S.A.
  • Yale University, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies 370 Prospect Street New Haven CT 06511 U.S.A.
  • USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center SO Conte Anadromous Fish Research Lab 1 Migratory Way Turner Falls MA 01376 U.S.A.
  • Signal Innovations Group, Inc 4721 Emperor Boulevard, Suite 330 Durham NC 27703 U.S.A.
  • Institute for Wildlife Studies P.O. Box 1104 Arcata CA 95518 U.S.A.
  • Department of Geography, Box 3220 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NC 27599 U.S.A.
  • Department of Biological Sciences Virginia Tech 1405 Perry Street, Box 0406 Blacksburg VA 24061 U.S.A.
Venue
Conservation Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-08-12
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
1584-1593
ISSN
  • 0888-8892
  • 1523-1739
DOI
10.1111/cobi.12362
Cited by
111
References
2
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Funders
Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (RC-1471)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review