The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Applying network theory to prioritize multispecies habitat networks that are robust to climate and land‐use change
Abstract
Designing connected landscapes is among the most widespread strategies for achieving biodiversity conservation targets. The challenge lies in simultaneously satisfying the connectivity needs of multiple species at multiple spatial scales under uncertain climate and land‐use change. To evaluate the contribution of remnant habitat fragments to the connectivity of regional habitat networks, we developed a method to integrate uncertainty in climate and land‐use change projections with the latest developments in network‐connectivity research and spatial, multipurpose conservation prioritization. We used land‐use change simulations to explore robustness of species’ habitat networks to alternative development scenarios. We applied our method to 14 vertebrate focal species of periurban Montreal, Canada. Accounting for connectivity in spatial prioritization strongly modified conservation priorities and the modified priorities were robust to uncertain climate change. Setting conservation priorities based on habitat quality and connectivity maintained a large proportion of the region's connectivity, despite anticipated habitat loss due to climate and land‐use change. The application of connectivity criteria alongside habitat‐quality criteria for protected‐area design was efficient with respect to the amount of area that needs protection and did not necessarily amplify trade‐offs among conservation criteria. Our approach and results are being applied in and around Montreal and are well suited to the design of ecological networks and green infrastructure for the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services in other regions, in particular regions around large cities, where connectivity is critically low.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The three studies created composite maps by summing the single-species results or by calculating the mean score for each patch of habitat.
“The three studies have created composite maps by summing the single-species results or by calculating the mean score for each patch of habitat.”
From Omnidirectional and omnifunctional connectivity analyses with a diverse species pool (2020) · cites this paper as Albert et al., 2017
Assessing connectivity across multiple types of habitats requires merging the results of several species-level connectivity analyses to account for the variety of ways in which different species react to different types of landscape elements.
“it requires to merge the results of several species-level connectivity analyses, to account for the variety of ways in which different species react to different types of landscape elements”
From Omnidirectional and omnifunctional connectivity analyses with a diverse species pool (2020) · cites this paper as Albert et al., 2017
To evaluate landscape connectivity for entire communities, a territory's features should be analysed according to the needs of a diverse number of terrestrial and aquatic species.
“it has been suggested to analyse a territory's features according to the needs of a diverse number of terrestrial and aquatic species”
From Omnidirectional and omnifunctional connectivity analyses with a diverse species pool (2020) · cites this paper as Albert et al., 2017
These eco-profiles were designed through dimensionality reduction based on species connectivity and habitat needs, either using clustering or multivariate analysis.
“These eco-profiles were designed through dimensionality reduction based on species connectivity and habitat needs, either using clustering or multivariate analysis.”
From Omnidirectional and omnifunctional connectivity analyses with a diverse species pool (2020) · cites this paper as Albert et al., 2017
Albert et al. (2017) and Sahraoui et al. (2017) selected 14 and 16 eco-profiles respectively, each composed of one or more species, to represent a broader range of dispersal behaviours and habitat requirements.
“Albert et al. (2017) and Sahraoui et al. (2017) selected 14 and 16 eco-profiles respectively, each composed of one or more species, in order to represent a broader range of dispersal behaviours and habitat requirements.”
From Omnidirectional and omnifunctional connectivity analyses with a diverse species pool (2020) · cites this paper as Albert et al., 2017
These studies have demonstrated that it is possible to create connectivity analyses for a large number of species, which may be ecologically more relevant.
“These studies have demonstrated that it is possible to create connectivity analyses for a large number of species, which may be ecologically more relevant.”
From Omnidirectional and omnifunctional connectivity analyses with a diverse species pool (2020) · cites this paper as Albert et al., 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems
Haddad, N. M., Brudvig, L. A., Clobert, J., Davies, K. F., Gonzalez, A., Holt, R. D., Lovejoy, T. E., Sexton, J. O., Austin, M. P., Collins, C. D., et al. (2015) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500052 · Cited by 4,773
Self-citationPelletier, D., Clark, M., Anderson, M. G., Rayfield, B., Wulder, M. A., & Cardille, J. A. (2014) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084135 · Cited by 158
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00242-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3545823 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10980-007-9108-4 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01716.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/d2111181 · DOI
- 10.1111/2041-210X.12162 · DOI
- 10.1111/cobi.12667 · DOI
- 10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0529:ACGTCM]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01753.x · DOI
- Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), 2010, COP‐10 decision X/2
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0086487 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511754821 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.10.023 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00334-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1023/B:BIOC.0000004319.91643.9e · DOI
- 10.1111/2041-210X.12614 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0705527105 · DOI
- 10.1038/nclimate2105 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050157 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1005846910199 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0053315 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.05.001 · DOI
- 10.1111/ecog.01507 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.016 · DOI
- 10.1111/mec.12847 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0059640 · DOI
- 10.1111/ddi.12162 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01558.x · DOI
- 10.5751/ES-07927-200415 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2005.3164 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01562.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00956.x · DOI
- R Development Core Team, 2012, R Foundation for Statistical Computing
- 10.1111/2041-210X.12470 · DOI
- 10.1111/1365-2664.12179 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.06.011 · DOI
- 10.3375/043.035.0120 · DOI
- 10.1111/gcb.13272 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10980-009-9355-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.01.002 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Omnidirectional and omnifunctional connectivity analyses with a diverse species pool
Tessier, D. L., Maranger, R., & Poisot, T. (2020) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.02.03.932095 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Albert, C. H., Rayfield, B., Dumitru, M., & Gonzalez, A.
- Affiliations
- Aix Marseille Univ Univ Avignon CNRS, IRD, IMBE, Case 421 Av Escadrille Normandie Niémen 13 397 Marseille cedex 20 France
- Department of Biology McGill University Stewart Biology Building 1205 Docteur Penfield Montreal QC H3A 1B1 Canada
- ORCID
- Albert, Cécile H.
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-07-31
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1383-1396
- ISSN
- 0888-8892
- 1523-1739
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
