Pilot study of acceptance and commitment therapy for irritable bowel syndrome: A preliminary analysis of treatment outcomes and processes of change.
Open accessAbstract
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and proposed processes of change of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) in improving the outcomes of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Methods: A total of 56 consecutive patients recruited from a specialist clinic were included in the study and completed an ACT treatment protocol (one‐day group workshop plus self‐help manual). Assessments of process (acceptance of IBS) and outcome variables (symptom severity, avoidance behaviours, quality of life, and gastrointestinal anxiety) were carried at four time points (assessment, pre‐treatment, post‐treatment, and follow‐up). Results: A significant increase in the acceptance of IBS and improvement in all outcome variables was observed from pre‐ to post‐treatment and follow‐up (effect sizes medium to large). Improvements in all outcomes were associated with increases in acceptance of IBS. Changes in acceptance of IBS from pre‐ to post‐treatment were a significant predictor of improvements in outcomes from pre‐treatment to follow‐up. Conclusions: Results support the efficacy of a brief ACT protocol in improving IBS outcomes and maintaining therapy effects at six‐month follow‐up. Preliminary support for the treatment process proposed was also found.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
7 of 38 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
CBT effects wane at 6 months follow-up.
“and its effects to wane at 6 months follow-up (Kennedy et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Kennedy et al., 2006 source
- Premisecitation
Cognitive change was not associated with significant changes in IBS outcomes in one study.
“One study as also found that cognitive change (a key component of CBT) was not associated with any significant changes in IBS outcomes (Lackner et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Lackner et al., 2007 source
The Methods (Assessment; page unavailable) list psychological distress and IBS outcomes, but not a measure of cognitive change over treatment. The Results (Structural Equation Analysis; page unavailable) address whether distress explains improvement, not whether cognitive change is significantly associated with IBS outcomes. The Discussion describes that question as largely uncharted; the claimed finding is not reported in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Self-help psychological interventions are a cost-effective way to provide patients with skills to manage their condition.
“Self-Help interventions such as psychological self-management are a cost-effective way to provide patients with the skills to manage their condition (Dorn, 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Dorn, 2010 source
The Background says self-management interventions aim to develop patients’ knowledge and skills, and the Discussion reports benefits for patients with IBS. The Discussion does not establish that psychological self-help interventions are cost-effective; it describes even minimal-contact CBT as resource-intensive and potentially challenging for practices. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
Increases in IBS acceptance were associated with improvements in all outcomes.
“Improvements in all outcomes were associated with increases in acceptance of IBS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Symptom severity's significant contribution to explained variance in all outcomes became non-significant once IBS acceptance was entered in the model.
“It is interesting to note that although on its own symptom severity made a significant contribution to the explained variance of all outcomes, this became non-significant (p>.05 for all β) once IBS acceptance was entered in the model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
In the hierarchical regression, changes in symptom severity from before to after treatment accounted for an average of 16% of explained variance across all outcomes.
“When changes in symptom severity from pre-to post-treatment were entered as a second step, these accounted for an average of 16% of explained variance across all outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At 6-month follow-up, 35% (n=20) of patients moved to a lower symptom severity category.
“Also, 35% (n=20) of patients had moved to a lower categorization of their symptom severity (e.g. from severe to moderate).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
IBS acceptance contributed an average of 14.3% of the variance in all outcome measures after controlling for change in symptom severity.
“IBS acceptance contributed with an average 14.3% of the variance in all outcome measures, even after controlling for the change in symptom severity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In 56 IBS patients from a specialist clinic, a brief ACT intervention (one-day group workshop plus self-help manual) led to a statistically significant rise in IBS acceptance from before treatment to after treatment.
“A significant increase in the acceptance of IBS and improvement in all outcome variables was observed from pre-to post-treatment and follow-up (effect sizes medium to large).”
- Also stated in: § Impact of treatment · plain
“IBS acceptance significantly increased, t(55)=5.09,p<.001, although the effect size was only small to moderate (d=.32).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Impact of treatment · plain
- Findingown data
From before treatment to 6-month follow-up, every outcome variable improved significantly.
“The same pattern of improvement in all outcome variables was observed for the period between pre-treatment and follow-up (all t(55)>3.66,all p≤.001), with a small to moderate effect size for the use of avoidant behaviours (d=.39); a moderate effect size for symptom severity(d=.47)and IBS impact on quality of life (d=.55);and a large effect size for GSA (d=1.10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Changes in IBS acceptance from before to after treatment significantly predicted improvements in outcomes from before treatment to follow-up.
“Changes in acceptance of IBS from pre-to post-treatment were a significant predictor of improvements in outcomes from pre-treatment to follow-up.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At 6-month follow-up, 11 patients (19.6%) no longer met Rome III criteria for IBS.
“At 6 month follow-up, 11 patients (19.6%) no longer met the criteria for IBS as assessed by the ROME III criteria IBS module.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The same ACT intervention was followed by significant improvement in every outcome variable from before treatment to after treatment.
“Between pre-and post-treatment, there was a significant improvement in all outcomes, all t(55) > 3.13, all p<.01, with a small to moderate reduction in use of avoidant behaviours (d=.32), a moderate reduction in symptom severity (d=.41) and in IBS impact on quality of life (d=.41),and a large reduction in GSA (d=.76).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When IBS acceptance was included, symptom severity changes no longer significantly explained variance in outcome changes.
“this became non-significant (p>.05 for all β) once IBS acceptance was entered in the model.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“In fact, changes in symptom severity lost their significance in explaining variance in the changes in outcomes when IBS acceptance was accounted for.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingown data
IBS acceptance was the sole variable making a unique significant contribution to explaining outcome changes.
“Therefore IBS acceptance was the only variable to make a unique significant contribution in accounting for changes in the outcome variables.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Pre- to post-treatment changes in IBS acceptance significantly predicted all pre-treatment to follow-up outcome changes, even after controlling for possible symptom severity fluctuations.
“This study shows that changes in IBS acceptance from pre-to post-treatment were a significant predictor of all outcomes changes from pre-treatment to follow-up even when possible fluctuations in symptom severity were accounted for.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No significant changes occurred in any outcome during the baseline period.
“During the baseline period, no significant changes were detected in any of the outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
At post-treatment, 82.2% (n=46) of patients reported using the self-help manual.
“At post-treatment 82.2% (n=46) of patients reported to have used the manual.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The statistical prediction of later outcome changes by earlier acceptance changes reflects the proposed treatment process rather than an artifact.
- Study design and conductcitation
A gastroenterology consultant confirmed IBS diagnosis using clinical interview and Rome III criteria.
“A gastroenterology consultant (Author4) confirmed IBS diagnosis using both clinical interview and the Rome III criteria (Longstreth et al., 2006) as suggested by the British Society of Gastroenterology (Spiller et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Study design and conductown data
At 6-month follow-up, 70% (n=40) of patients were still using the manual regularly.
“At 6 month follow-up 70% (n=40) of patients were still making regular use of the manual.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The statistical prediction of later outcome changes by earlier acceptance changes reflects the proposed treatment process rather than an artifact.
- Premisecitation
CBT has not been shown to be more effective than placebo for IBS.
“it has been shown not to be more effective than placebo (Blanchard et al., 2007)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Blanchard et al., 2007 source
- Study design and conductown data
Completers and noncompleters did not differ on any demographic variable.
“No differences were found (all p<.05) for any of the demographic variables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The findings give preliminary support for the proposed treatment process.
“Preliminary support for the treatment process proposed was also found.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The statistical prediction of later outcome changes by earlier acceptance changes reflects the proposed treatment process rather than an artifact.
- Premisecitation
Increasing acceptance significantly improves outcomes in chronic pain and diabetes.
“Several studies have shown that increasing acceptance significantly improves outcomes in health conditions such as chronic pain (McCracken, Vowles, & Eccleston, 2005) or diabetes (Gregg, Callaghan, Hayes, & Glenn-Lawson, 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Study design and conductown data
No significant changes occurred during the baseline period (assessment to pre-treatment) for any outcome or process measure.
“There were no significant changes in the baseline period, all t(55)<1.61,all p>.05.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
Those prior IBS studies did not assess whether outcome improvements were associated with changes in acceptance or mindfulness.
“However these studies did not assess whether the improvements in outcomes were associated with changes in processes such as acceptance or mindfulness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The current design and analyses cannot provide robust proof that changes in acceptance cause changes in outcomes.
“Finally, it should be noted that although the pilot data presented here suggests that changes in acceptance are potentially related to changes in outcomes the current design and analyses cannot provide a robust proof of this mechanism of action.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The large GSA effect suggests that helping patients adopt a more accepting stance toward GSA may be a key treatment component.
“The large effect size of the treatment on GSA seems to suggest that re-framing the relation patients have with their GSA, by having a more accepting stance, might be one of the key aspects of treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
ACT could be integrated into clinical practice as a quick, low-cost alternative psychological treatment for many patients in tertiary services.
“This study has shown that ACT has the potential to be integrated in clinical practice as an alternative form of psychological treatment that can be delivered quickly and with low costs to large number of patients attending tertiary services.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Only one of the six proposed ACT processes, acceptance, was assessed.
“A third limitation would be that only one of the six proposed ACT processes (Acceptance) was assessed in this study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
ACT has been shown to be effectively delivered in self-help formats.
“ACT has been shown to be effectively delivered in self-help formats in several studies (e.g.Gregg et al., 2007;Lillis, Hayes, Bunting, & Masuda, 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Study design and conductnone given
The study did not comprehensively assess treatment fidelity.
“Further limitations include the lack of a more comprehensive assessment of treatment fidelity”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The lack of a formal control group is a limitation.
“The second limitation pertains to the absence of a formal control group condition”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Earlier ACT-consistent intervention studies had not examined processes of change.
“Although the efficacy of ACT consistent interventions has already been reported in previous studies (Ljótsson, Andréewitch, et al., 2010;Ljótsson, Falk, et al., 2010), these did not address the issues of process of change.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ljótsson, Andréewitch, et al., 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Ljótsson, Falk, et al., 2010 source
- Interpretationown data
The study adds support to the literature showing ACT interventions work through their hypothesised processes in health contexts.
“This study further supports the growing literature of the efficacy of ACT interventions through their hypothesized processes in health contexts (Gregg et al., 2007;McCracken & Gutiérrez-Martínez, 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data
The findings suggest that the hypothesised treatment process-targeting acceptance to improve outcomes-is valid.
“Taken together, these results seem to suggest that the hypothesised treatment process, in which targeting acceptance will lead to improvements in outcomes, is valid.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 35
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 17
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe IBSSSS has satisfactory reliability and is sensitive to change.
“This scale has been shown to have satisfactory reliability and to be sensitive to change (Gonsalkorale, Miller, Afzal, & Whorwell, 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Gonsalkorale, Miller, Afzal, & Whorwell, 2003 source
The IBS symptoms section reports significant changes in overall IBS questionnaire scores after hypnotherapy, which supports the scale detecting change in this cohort. The Discussion’s statement about reliability concerns the separate subjective assessment questionnaire (SAQ), not the IBS severity scale. The paper does not establish satisfactory reliability for the IBSSSS. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGSA is a key feature in IBS symptom maintenance, and higher GSA is related to higher symptom severity and lower quality of life.
“GSA is a key feature in IBS symptom maintenance, by acting as an endogenous stressor, and higher levels of GSA have consistently been shown to be related to higher symptom severity and lower quality of life (Jerndal et al., 2010;Labus et al., 2004Labus et al., , 2007)).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Jerndal et al., 2010 source
- cites Labus et al., 2004 source
The Validity section reports that higher GSA, measured by the VSI, was associated with greater IBS symptom severity. The Introduction describes GSA as a possible endogenous stressor and a possible contributor to impaired quality of life, but the Proposed use section says its role in symptom maintenance had not been directly tested. This study does not establish a direct association between higher GSA scores and lower quality of life. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Labus et al., 2007 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSymptom reduction is not a central ACT target, yet ACT studies commonly report such reductions.
“Although symptom reduction is not a key target in ACT, it is not uncommon for ACT studies to report these reductions (Hayes, Luoma, Bond, Masuda, & Lillis, 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Hayes, Luoma, Bond, Masuda, & Lillis, 2006 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEvidence for psychological IBS interventions is growing, but economic costs have led to self-management approaches being proposed as viable alternatives.
“Empirical support for psychological interventions for IBS is growing (Zijdenbos, Wit, Heijden, Rubin, & Quartero, 2009), however, due to economic costs self-management approaches are being put forward as viable alternatives (Dorn, 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Zijdenbos, Wit, Heijden, Rubin, & Quartero, 2009 source
- cites Dorn, 2010 source
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that self-management interventions can benefit patients with IBS, sometimes more than psychological interventions. It does not propose them as viable alternatives because of the economic cost of psychological treatment; instead, it questions whether many self-management interventions are feasible in routine practice. The Background’s cost figure concerns IBS overall, not psychological treatment. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost background variables had no significant contribution to explained variance of any outcome, except education accounted for some variance in GSA change, which became non-significant when accounting for IBS acceptance.
“As shown in Table 3 most background variables had no significant contribution to the explained variance of any of the outcomes, except for education accounting some variance in the change score of GSA (however this became non-significant when accounting for IBS acceptance).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAdding changes in acceptance as a final step significantly increased total variance explained, with an average total of 32% (range 17% for quality of life to 40% for avoidant behaviours).
“Adding the changes in the process measure of acceptance as a final step resulted in a significant (all p<.05) increment of the total variance explained by the equations with an average total of 32% (range 17% IBS impact on quality of life to 40% on use of avoidant behaviours).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMore frequent workbook use was significantly associated with greater reductions in GSA (r=.31, p=.03), but not with other outcome or process variables.
“Higher frequency of use of the workbook was significantly associated with greater reductions in GSA (r=.31; p=.03), but not with the remaining outcome or process variables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The statistical prediction of later outcome changes by earlier acceptance changes reflects the proposed treatment process rather than an artifact.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFrom before treatment to 6-month follow-up, IBS acceptance rose significantly, with a moderate effect size.
“There was also a significant increase in IBS acceptance, t(55)=6.38,p<.001 with a moderate effect size (d=.50).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOutcome effect sizes were small to medium at post-treatment and rose to medium at follow-up.
“Effect-sizes were between small to medium at post-treatment but increased to medium at follow-up.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSome improvements were clinically significant: nearly 20% of patients no longer met diagnostic criteria at follow-up, and 35% improved their symptom severity classification.
“Finally it is also important to highlight that improvements were also clinically significant in some cases, with almost 20% of patients not meeting criteria for diagnosis at follow-up and 35% of patients improving their symptom severity classification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIBS acceptance, the intervention's main target, had a small effect size initially and a medium effect size at 6 months.
“Regarding IBS acceptance which was the main target of the intervention, this initially had a small effect size change however 6 months after treatment it had increased to a medium level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt post-treatment and 6-month follow-up, significant improvements appeared in symptom severity, IBS quality-of-life impact, avoidant behaviours, and gastrointestinal-specific anxiety.
“Significant improvements in symptom severity, IBS impact on quality of life, use of avoidant behaviours and GSA were observed immediately at post-treatment and at 6 month follow-up.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGastrointestinal-specific anxiety showed a very large effect size immediately after treatment, which grew further at follow-up.
“The exception was GSA, for which a very large effect-size was immediately observed after treatment and that increased even further at follow-up.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPatients maintained their initial post-treatment gains and continued improving at 6-month follow-up.
“Also important to note is patients held their initial posttreatment effects and continued to improve at 6 month follow-up.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationACT proposes that unwillingness to contact aversive experiences leads to excessive control attempts and behavioural patterns away from valued activities.
“ACT proposes that an unwillingness to contact aversive physical, cognitive and emotional experiences (also called experiential avoidance) leads to excessive attempts to try and control, change or eliminate these experiences, promoting therefore behavioural patterns that lead people away from valued activities (Hayes, Strosahl & Wilson, 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hayes, Strosahl & Wilson, 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationCBT is presented as the best evidence-based psychological treatment for IBS.
“Although cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) has been presented as the best evidence-based psychological treatment (Zijdenbos, Wit, Heijden, Rubin, & Quartero, 2009)for IBS”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zijdenbos, Wit, Heijden, Rubin, & Quartero, 2009 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe IBS36 has high internal consistency (α=0.95), high test-retest reliability, and is responsive to change.
“The scale has a high internal consistency (α = 0.95), high test-retest reliability and is responsive to change (Groll et al., 2002)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Groll et al., 2002 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe local ethics committee approved the study protocol and patients gave written informed consent.
“The local ethics committee approved the study protocol and patients gave written informed consent prior to enrolment (approval number 08/S1103/67).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataCompleters and noncompleters differed only marginally on GSA, with noncompleters reporting higher GSA.
“Regarding the process and outcome variables there was only a marginally significant difference for GSA (t=2.05,p=0.46) with noncompleters reporting higher GSA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe IBS-BRQ has good internal consistency (α=.86) and validity.
“This scale has a good internal consistency (α=.86) and validity (Reme, Darnley, Kennedy, & Chalder, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reme, Darnley, Kennedy, & Chalder, 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationFerreira et al. (2011) propose that moving away from valued activities enhances suffering in IBS.
“Ferreira et al. (2011) propose that it is the movement away from activities that are important in one's life that enhances experiences of suffering in IBS as the patient becomes stuck in a set rigid behavioural patterns that allow for less diversity of experiences, therefore curtailing the possibility of experiencing events that would be likely to enhance Quality of Life or even the symptoms them”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ferreira et al. (2011)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe VSI has good internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.93) and validity.
“The scale has good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.93) and validity (Labus et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Labus et al., 2007 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe findings support the efficacy of a brief ACT protocol for improving IBS outcomes and for maintaining effects at 6-month follow-up.
“Results support the efficacy of a brief ACT protocol in improving IBS outcomes and maintaining therapy effects at 6 month follow-up.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Improvements in IBS outcomes from before treatment to after treatment and follow-up are attributable to the ACT intervention rather than to spontaneous symptom fluctuation, regression to the mean, or other non-treatment factors.
- Rests on an assumption: The 6-month follow-up period is sufficient to demonstrate maintenance of therapy effects.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenTreatment fidelity was maintained by using a session protocol and producing a self-help manual.
“Treatment fidelity was maintained by using a session protocol and producing a self-help manual.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe IBSAAQ has good reliability (α=.89) and good validity.
“This scale has shown to have good reliability (α = .89)and good validity ( Ferreira, Eugenicos, Morris, & Gillanders, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ferreira, Eugenicos, Morris, & Gillanders, 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningA baseline period similar in length to the intervention could serve as an adequate control, since post-treatment changes are unlikely to result from time passage or coincidental events in a population without prior standard care benefit.
“however using a baseline period similar to the intervention length could be seen as an adequate control as it is unlikely that changes post-treatment could be accounted by passage of time or coincidental events at the time of treatment in a population that had not benefitted from previous standard care approaches.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPrior chronic pain research has shown similar increases in acceptance over time.
“Similar increases in acceptance over time have been previously observed in chronic pain (McCracken & Gutiérrez-Martínez, 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McCracken & Gutiérrez-Martínez, 2011 source
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningTwo of the study authors delivered all interventions, raising potential bias in delivery and assessment.
“or the fact that two of the study authors conducted all the interventions.Therefore, potential issues of bias in the delivery and assessment of the intervention should be accounted for in future studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenImplementing this intervention may require relatively low human and economic investment.
“Given that implementing this intervention will potentially involve a relatively low level of human and economic investment, it is suggested that it could be made available as part of the standard treatment for these patients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe rise in IBS acceptance over time fits ACT's proposition that acceptance is trainable and can increase with continued practice.
“This seems to be in line with ACT's proposal that acceptance is defined as a behaviour that is passable of being trained, therefore passable to grow with continuous use (Hayes et al., 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hayes et al., 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningACT may be indicated for patients whose improvements have plateaued or who did not improve with symptom-focused treatment.
“Alternatively this study suggests that ACT might be indicated for cases in which improvements either plateaued or were not obtained via the normal symptom focused approach.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe study's self-selected sample-46% of those approached agreed, mostly female and higher educated-limits generalisation to the full IBS population.
“Some limitations include the fact that the study used a self-selected sample (only 46% of patients approached agreed to participate in the study) that was predominantly female and had attended higher education, therefore curtailing any generalization of the results to the whole population of IBS patients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningACT interventions are thought to reduce symptom reporting by disrupting the aversive experience-control behaviour-immediate relief cycle through acceptance, thereby lowering the functional importance of aversive symptoms.
“So it is thought that some of the aversive features of the symptoms might be removed by lowering their functional importance, therefore resulting in a lower reporting of symptoms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAvoidant coping in IBS is associated with poorer quality of life, high anxiety and depression, and predicts psychotherapeutic treatment success.
“Recent studies have shown the use of avoidant coping in IBS to be associated with poorer quality of life, high levels of anxiety and depression (Rutter & Rutter, 2007) and to be a good predictor of psychotherapeutic treatment success (Reme, Kennedy, Jones, Darnley, & Chalder, 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Rutter & Rutter, 2007 source
- cites Reme, Kennedy, Jones, Darnley, & Chalder, 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe sampling method may be a strength because it was naturalistic and allowed comprehensive assessment using gold standard criteria.
“However this sampling method could be seen as a strength as it was done in a naturalistic context and allowed for a comprehensive assessment using gold standard criteria (Spiller et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Spiller et al., 2007 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe IBSAAQ measure includes elements of IBS willingness and engagement with important life activities.
“Although, as reported by Ferreira et al. (2012), the measure used (IBSAAQ) encompasses elements of IBS willingness and engagement with important life activities”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ferreira et al. (2012)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe data support the intervention's effectiveness and suggest it operated through the theoretically hypothesised processes.
“Regarding clinical applications, data seems to support the effectiveness of this intervention, but also suggested that it worked through the theoretically hypothesized processes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSymptom reduction need not always be the target for IBS interventions; targeting patients' relationship with their symptoms can effectively change physical and psychological outcomes.
“This study also implies that symptom reduction might not always have to be the target of interventions with IBS populations and that targeting the relation patients have with their symptoms can be an effective way to produce changes in both physical and psychological outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThis maintenance and further improvement is consistent with Ljótsson and colleagues' 3-month follow-up findings and with ACT behavioural principles.
“This is consistent with the findings of Ljótsson and colleagues (2010) at 3 month follow-up and with the behavioural tenets of ACT, in which it is reasonable to expect that a continuous engagement with accepting and valued behavioural patterns will lead to better outcomes therefore sustaining the effects of treatment by the positive consequences of these new behavioural patterns.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ljótsson and colleagues (2010)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe trial's results align with two recent ACT-informed IBS studies and strengthen the evidence base for psychological IBS treatments.
“These results support the findings of two recent studies evaluating the efficacy of ACT informed interventions in improving IBS outcomes (Ljótsson, Andréewitch, et al., 2010;Ljótsson, Falk, et al., 2010) and also add to the evidence base of psychological approaches for IBS (Zijdenbos et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
The paper relies on this without support.
Improvements in IBS outcomes from before treatment to after treatment and follow-up are attributable to the ACT intervention rather than to spontaneous symptom fluctuation, regression to the mean, or other non-treatment factors.
“Results support the efficacy of a brief ACT protocol in improving IBS outcomes and maintaining therapy effects at 6 month follow-up.”
“These results suggest that treatment had an impact on all outcome and process variables, and that the magnitude of impact increases through time.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 6-month follow-up period is sufficient to demonstrate maintenance of therapy effects.
“Results support the efficacy of a brief ACT protocol in improving IBS outcomes and maintaining therapy effects at 6 month follow-up.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The statistical prediction of later outcome changes by earlier acceptance changes reflects the proposed treatment process rather than an artifact.
“Preliminary support for the treatment process proposed was also found.”
“Changes in acceptance of IBS from pre-to post-treatment were a significant predictor of improvements in outcomes from pre-treatment to follow-up.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Third-wave cognitive and behavioural therapies have been suggested as particularly pertinent in populations with illness.
“Third-wave cognitive and behavioural therapies (CBT) (e.g., Mindfulness-Based Interventions, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy [ACT], and Compassion Focused Therapy [CFT]). have been suggested as particularly pertinent in populations with illness (Graham et al., 2016; Ferreira et al., 2018; Trindade et al., 2018).”
From Randomized controlled trial of an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and compassion-based group intervention for persons with inflammatory bowel disease: the LIFEwithIBD intervention (2024) · cites this paper as Ferreira et al., 2018
The Introduction suggests ACT for irritable bowel syndrome, and the Treatment section describes similar ACT protocols in chronic pain and diabetes. This supports the point for ACT in some illness populations, but the paper does not make the broader claim about third-wave therapies as a group, including Compassion Focused Therapy. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredACT effectively reduces IBS symptoms.
“Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is another treatment derived from CBT that effectively reduces IBS symptoms [31, 32].”
From Comparing the effectiveness of transdiagnostic treatment with acceptance and commitment therapy on emotional disorders, rumination, and life satisfaction in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: a randomized clinical trial (2024) · cites this paper as [32]
The Discussion (page not available in our copy) reports significant improvements in IBS symptom severity after ACT, sustained at six-month follow-up. But this was a pilot study without a formal control group, and the authors caution against generalizing from its self-selected sample; it does not establish the unqualified claim that ACT effectively reduces IBS symptoms. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredA 1-day ACT intervention can be useful to increase acceptance of IBS.
“Even so, a 1-day ACT intervention can be useful to increase acceptance of IBS [91,92].”
From Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy in central pain sensitization syndromes: A systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [91]
The Discussion reports increased IBS acceptance after treatment, with the effect growing by six months. However, the Treatment section describes a one-day ACT group session followed by two months of self-help manual use and two support calls. The study therefore supports the usefulness of the combined protocol, not the one-day session alone. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredGrowing evidence supports the effectiveness of ACT for anxiety, depression, stress, chronic pain, irritable bowel syndrome, and smoking cessation.
“Growing evidence has supported the effectiveness of ACT for myriad psychological and health conditions including anxiety, depression, stress, chronic pain, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and smoking cessation [25,26,27,28,29,30].”
There is controversy regarding the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of ACT in reducing severity of IBS symptoms, improving quality of life, and changing value-related behaviors.
“In general, there is controversy regarding the effectiveness [91,92], or ineffectiveness [111], of ACT in reducing the severity of IBS symptoms, and regarding its capacity to improve the quality of life of IBS patients, and change value-related behaviors [91,92].”
From Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy in central pain sensitization syndromes: A systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [91]
ACT has shown promising results in adults with various FSS.
“and in adults with various FSS [28–31].”
From Feasibility of group-based acceptance and commitment therapy for adolescents (AHEAD) with multiple functional somatic syndromes: A pilot study (2020) · cites this paper as [31]
The findings are in accordance with previously reported positive impact of psychological treatment on symptom load and functioning in children and adolescents with FSS and of ACT-based interventions in adults with FSS.
“The findings are in accordance with the previously reported positive impact of psychological treatment on symptom load and functioning in children and adolescents with FSS [24–26, 28] and of ACT-based interventions in adults with FSS [29–31].”
From Feasibility of group-based acceptance and commitment therapy for adolescents (AHEAD) with multiple functional somatic syndromes: A pilot study (2020) · cites this paper as [31]
Participants in that study continued to improve in all outcomes at 6-month follow-up with small to large effect sizes.
“Participants continued to improve in all outcomes at 6-month follow-up with small to large effect sizes (avoidant behaviour, d = .39; symptom severity, d = .47; IBS impact on quality of life, d = .55; GI-specific anxiety, d = 1.10).”
From Preliminary investigation of the associations between psychological flexibility, symptoms and daily functioning in people with chronic abdominal pain (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
One uncontrolled study of ACT for IBS showed participants significantly improved in all outcomes at post-treatment, including reduced avoidance behaviour (d=.32), symptom severity (d=.41), IBS impact on quality of life (d=.41) and GI-specific anxiety (d=.76).
“One uncontrolled study of ACT for IBS included a 1-day workshop and a self-help manual.29 The results showed that participants significantly improved in all outcomes investigated at post-treatment, including reduced avoidance behaviour (d = .32), symptom severity (d = .41), IBS impact on quality of life (d = .41) and GI-specific anxiety (d = .76).”
From Preliminary investigation of the associations between psychological flexibility, symptoms and daily functioning in people with chronic abdominal pain (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
IBS acceptance improved significantly at post-treatment (d=.32) and continued at follow-up (d=.50).
“IBS acceptance, a specific form of a key component of the PF model, also improved significantly at post-treatment (d = .32), and the improvement continued at follow-up (d = .50).”
From Preliminary investigation of the associations between psychological flexibility, symptoms and daily functioning in people with chronic abdominal pain (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
These findings are in line with evidence from previous studies supporting the associations between PF processes and aspects of daily functioning in GI conditions.
“On the positive side, these findings are in line with evidence from previous studies supporting the associations between PF processes and aspects of daily functioning in GI conditions.”
From Preliminary investigation of the associations between psychological flexibility, symptoms and daily functioning in people with chronic abdominal pain (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
Previous studies of ACT for IBS showed significant improvement in acceptance after the treatment, maintained at follow-up.
“Previous studies of ACT for IBS29,30 showed significant improvement in acceptance after the treatment, maintained at follow-up.”
From Preliminary investigation of the associations between psychological flexibility, symptoms and daily functioning in people with chronic abdominal pain (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Consistentt(55) = 5.09reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(55)=5.09,p < .001”
- Consistentt(55) = 6.38reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(55)=6.38,p < .001”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.
Cites
Using Self-Report Assessment Methods to Explore Facets of Mindfulness
Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191105283504 · Cited by 7,511 · see citing works
Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes
Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006 · Cited by 6,587 · see citing works
Longstreth, G. F., Thompson, W. G., Chey, W. D., Houghton, L. A., Mearin, F., & Spiller, R. C. (2006) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.061 · Cited by 4,856 · see citing works
FRANCIS, C. Y., MORRIS, J., & WHORWELL, P. J. (1997) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2036.1997.142318000.x · Cited by 1,708 · see citing works
The development and initial validation of the cognitive fusion questionnaire
Gillanders, D. T., Bolderston, H., Bond, F. W., Dempster, M., Flaxman, P. E., Campbell, L., Kerr, S., Tansey, L., Noel, P., Ferenbach, C., et al. (2014) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2013.09.001 · Cited by 837 · see citing works
Self-citationGuidelines on the irritable bowel syndrome: mechanisms and practical management
Spiller, R., Aziz, Q., Creed, F., Emmanuel, A., Houghton, L., Hungin, P., Jones, R., Kumar, D., Rubin, G., Trudgill, N., et al. (2007) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2007.119446 · Cited by 818 · see citing works
Psychosocial Aspects of the Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders
Levy, R. L., Olden, K. W., Naliboff, B. D., Bradley, L. A., Francisconi, C., Drossman, D. A., & Creed, F. (2006) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.057 · Cited by 776 · see citing works
Gregg, J. A., Callaghan, G. M., Hayes, S. C., & Glenn-Lawson, J. L. (2007) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.75.2.336 · Cited by 695 · cited 3× · see citing works
“ACT has been shown to be effectively delivered in self-help formats in several studies (e.g., Gregg et al., 2007; Lillis, Hayes, Bunting, & Masuda, 2009).”
MethodResultLabus, J. S., Bolus, R., Chang, L., Wiklund, I., Naesdal, J., Mayer, E. A., & Naliboff, B. D. (2004) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02007.x · Cited by 475 · see citing works
McCracken, L. M., Vowles, K. E., & Eccleston, C. (2005) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2004.10.003 · Cited by 466 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The treatment philosophy and methods were congruent with similar successful ACT protocols previously used in chronic illness settings such as chronic pain (McCracken et al., 2005) and diabetes (Gregg et al.”
MethodLillis, J., Hayes, S. C., Bunting, K., & Masuda, A. (2009) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-009-9083-x · Cited by 459 · see citing works
McCracken, L. M., & Gutiérrez-Martínez, O. (2011) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2011.02.004 · Cited by 283 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Similar increases in acceptance over time have been previously observed in chronic pain (McCracken & Gutiérrez-Martínez, 2011).”
ResultLong term benefits of hypnotherapy for irritable bowel syndrome
Gonsalkorale, W. M., Miller, V, Afzal, A., & Whorwell, P. J. (2003) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.52.11.1623 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Ljótsson, B., Falk, L., Vesterlund, A. W., Hedman, E., Lindfors, P., Rück, C., Hursti, T., Andréewitch, S., Jansson, L., Lindefors, N., et al. (2010) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2010.03.003 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Labus, J. S., Mayer, E. A., Chang, L., Bolus, R., & Naliboff, B. D. (2007) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0b013e31802e2f24 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Frank, L. B., Kleinman, L., Rentz, A. M., Ciesla, G. N., Kim, J. J., & Zacker, C. (2002) · Clinical Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0149-2918(02)85143-8 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Halder, S. L. S., Locke, G. R., Talley, N. J., Fett, S. L., Zinsmeister, A. R., & Melton, L. J. (2004) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.0269-2813.2004.01807.x · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Jerndal, P., Ringström, G., Agerforz, P., Karpefors, M., Akkermans, L. M., Bayati, A., & Simrén, M. (2010) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2982.2010.01493.x · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Psychological treatments for the management of irritable bowel syndrome
Zijdenbos, I. L., de Wit, N. J., van der Heijden, G. J., Rubin, G., & Quartero, A. O. (2009) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006442.pub2 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Lackner, J. M., Jaccard, J., Krasner, S. S., Katz, L. A., Gudleski, G. D., & Blanchard, E. B. (2007) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.05.014 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Corney, R. H., & Stanton, R. (1990) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(90)90022-v · Cited by 166 · see citing works
A Focus Group Assessment of Patient Perspectives on Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Illness Severity
Drossman, D. A., Chang, L., Wanta, S. E., Blackman, C., Norton, W. F., & Norton, N. J. (2009) · Digestive Diseases and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s10620-009-0792-6 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
A controlled evaluation of group cognitive therapy in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome
Blanchard, E. B., Lackner, J. M., Sanders, K., Krasner, S., Keefer, L., Payne, A., Gudleski, G. D., Katz, L., Rowell, D., Sykes, M., et al. (2007) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2006.07.003 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
The IBS-36: a new quality of life measure for irritable bowel syndrome
Groll, D., Vanner, S. J., Depew, W. T., DaCosta, L. R., Simon, J. B., Groll, A., Roblin, N., & Paterson, W. G. (2002) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05616.x · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Kennedy, T., Chalder, T., McCrone, P., Darnley, S., Knapp, M., Jones, R., & Wessely, S. (2006) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta10190 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Exposure and mindfulness based therapy for irritable bowel syndrome - An open pilot study
Ljótsson, B., Andréewitch, S., Hedman, E., Rück, C., Andersson, G., & Lindefors, N. (2010) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.01.001 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
The development of the irritable bowel syndrome-behavioral responses questionnaire
Reme, S. E., Darnley, S., Kennedy, T., & Chalder, T. (2010) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.01.025 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Mind/Body Psychological Treatments for Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Naliboff, B. D., Fresé, M. P., & Rapgay, L. (2007) · Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1093/ecam/nem046 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Rutter, C. L., & Rutter, D. R. (2007) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105307071748 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Schneider, M. A., & Fletcher, P. C. (2008) · International Journal of Nursing Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1440-172x.2008.00677.x · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Patients’ experiences of living with irritable bowel syndrome
Rønnevig, M., Vandvik, P. O., & Bergbom, I. (2009) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05030.x · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Ferreira, N. B., Eugenicos, M. P., Morris, P. G., & Gillanders, D. T. (2013) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-012-0299-z · Cited by 33 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Although, as reported by Ferreira et al. (2012), the measure used (IBSAAQ) encompasses elements of IBS willingness and engagement with important life activities future studies could investigate the role of processes such as present moment awareness (using a mindfulness scale like the Five Facet…”
MethodSelf-citationReme, S. E., Kennedy, T., Jones, R., Darnley, S., & Chalder, T. (2010) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.01.003 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Systematic review: self‐management support interventions for irritable bowel syndrome
Dorn, S. D. (2010) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04374.x · Cited by 29 · see citing works
The role of gender and biological sex in irritable bowel syndrome
Frissora, C. L., & Koch, K. L. (2005) · Current Gastroenterology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11894-005-0017-x · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Using acceptance and commitment therapy in irritable bowel syndrome
Bravo Ferreira, N., Eugenicos, M., Graham Morris, P., & Gillanders, D. (2011) · Gastrointestinal Nursing · doi:10.12968/gasn.2011.9.9.28 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences
- Ferreira N., 2012, Better living with IBS
- Hayes S. C., 1999, Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behaviour change
- Zijdenbos I. L., 2009, Cochrane Library, 1, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An overview of and recommendations for more accessible digital mental health services
Lattie, E. G., Stiles-Shields, C., & Graham, A. K. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-021-00003-1 · Cited by 446 · see citing works
Behavioural medicine and gastrointestinal disorders: the promise of positive psychology
Keefer, L. (2018) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-018-0001-1 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Dochat, C., Wooldridge, J. S., Herbert, M. S., Lee, M. W., & Afari, N. (2021) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2021.03.003 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
“, 2018), and one included a self-guided bibliotherapy component (Ferreira et al., 2018).”
BackgroundTrindade, I. A., Melchior, C., Törnblom, H., & Simrén, M. (2022) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110809 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Galvez-Sánchez, C. M., Montoro, C. I., Moreno-Padilla, M., Reyes del Paso, G. A., & de la Coba, P. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm10122706 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“Psychological factors like pain acceptance in FMS and IBS patients [91,97,105], psychological flexibility in FMS and IBS patients [91,95,100], optimism about the illness in IBS patients [106,107], self-efficacy in FMS and IBS patients [100,108] and adherence to values in IBS patients [91,106] have been suggested to me…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCassar, G. E., Knowles, S., Youssef, G. J., Moulding, R., Uiterwijk, D., Waters, L., & Austin, D. W. (2018) · Psychology, Health & Medicine · doi:10.1080/13548506.2018.1476722 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
“sistent with previous research in IBS (Ferreira et al., 2017) and chronic pain (Ruiz, 2010).”
BackgroundResultBlakey, S. M., Halverson, T. F., Evans, M. K., Patel, T. A., Hair, L. P., Meyer, E. C., DeBeer, B. B., Beckham, J. C., Pugh, M. J., Calhoun, P. S., et al. (2021) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.07.033 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Adults living with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS): A qualitative systematic review
Shorey, S., Demutska, A., Chan, V., & Siah, K. T. H. (2020) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110289 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Kallesøe, K. H., Schröder, A., Wicksell, R. K., Preuss, T., Jensen, J. S., & Rask, C. U. (2020) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-020-02862-z · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Möller, S. P., Apputhurai, P., Tye–Din, J. A., & Knowles, S. R. (2021) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110652 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Lavelle, J., Storan, D., Eswara Murthy, V., De Dominicis, N., Mulcahy, H. E., & McHugh, L. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm11102757 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
An implementation trial of ACT-based bibliotherapy for irritable bowel syndrome
Gillanders, D., Ferreira, N. B., Angioni, E., Carvalho, S. A., & Eugenicos, M. P. (2017) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.04.006 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationGuadagnoli, L., Heathcote, L., Oudenhove, L. V., Elsenbruch, S., & Keefer, L. (2025) · The Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(25)00205-5 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Behavioral Strategies for Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Jagielski, C. H., & Riehl, M. E. (2021) · Gastroenterology Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.gtc.2021.03.006 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Ito, M., & Muto, T. (2020) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.11.009 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Ferreira, C., Pereira, J., Skvarc, D., Oliveira, S., Galhardo, A., Ferreira, N. B., Lucena-Santos, P., Carvalho, S. A., Matos-Pina, I., Rocha, B. S., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1367913 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationYu, L., Inspector, Y., & McCracken, L. M. (2021) · British Journal of Pain · doi:10.1177/2049463720926559 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Moderating effect of IBS acceptance on psychosocial mediators of Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Bowers, H., Gillanders, D. T., & Ferreira, N. B. (2020) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.02.004 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationShahkaram, H., Yaztappeh, J. S., Sadeghi, A., Kianimoghadam, A. S., Soltanabadi, S., Bakhtiari, M., & Arani, A. M. (2024) · BMC Gastroenterology · doi:10.1186/s12876-024-03142-w · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Pashing, S., & Sedgh, A. K. (2019) · فصلنامه علوم پزشکی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد پزشکی تهران · doi:10.29252/iau.29.2.181 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Innovations in the Psychological Care of Pediatric Disorders of Gut–Brain Interaction
Essner, B. S., & Boyle, S. L. (2023) · Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1037/cpp0000508 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“The fi eld ’ s understanding of DGBIs has rapidly evolved since the late 1980s, when Aldo Torsoli, MD, Professor of Gastroenterology at the University of Rome, led a working team that created consensus-based criteria for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).”
InfluentialRoss, E. J., Shanahan, M. L., Guadagnoli, L. A., Jimenez, D. E., & Cassisi, J. E. (2024) · Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being · doi:10.1111/aphw.12601 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Adamowicz, J. L., Sirotiak, Z., & Thomas, E. B. K. (2023) · Psychology Health & Medicine · doi:10.1080/13548506.2023.2216940 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Previous work in this area has often relied on unidimensional measures of psychological in flexibility (Ferreira et al., 2018; Jacobsen et al., 2017; Kanstrup et al., 2016; Leonidou et al., 2019; Masuda & Tully, 2012) or acceptance (Gauntlett-Gilbert et al., 2013; Luciano et al., 2014; Wetherell et…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSugaya, N., Tomita, Y., Funaba, M., Iida, H., Shirotsuki, K., Gardner, F. C., Odawara, T., Ando, T., & Inamori, M. (2022) · BioPsychoSocial Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13030-022-00244-3 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Karimian, Z., Haghayegh, S. A., Emami, M. H., & Raisi, M. (2021) · Journal of Research in Behavioural Sciences · doi:10.52547/rbs.19.3.477 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Eisele, M., Yousuf, M., Haskey, N., D’Silva, A., Nasser, Y., Franco, L., & Raman, M. (2025) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/nmo.70179 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Ryan, A., Ferreira, N. B., Moffat, H., Eugenicos, M. P., Howson, W., Casburn-Jones, A., Moroni, F., Stevens, P., Wolters, M. K., & Gillanders, D. T. (2025) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2025.100887 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationSeaman, A., & Ferreira, N. B. (2024) · Gastrointestinal Disorders · doi:10.3390/gidisord6010014 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“It is, however, encouraging that as a process variable, GSA seems to have a similar role in the development of problems with QoL as observed in IBS populations [35]; it can be specifically targeted through several types of psychological interventions (e.g., [36]).”
BackgroundSelf-citationCzuber‐Dochan, W., Watson, N., Mawdsley, J. E. D., Kent, A. J., Duff, A., Moulton, C. D., & Norton, C. S. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2406230/v1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
ezzati, Z., Shahabizadeh, F., Soleimannejad, K., & Nasri, M. (2021) · The Journal Of Psychological Science · doi:10.52547/jps.20.104.1403 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Manesh, F., Aghalar, S., Khorami, N., & Hafezi, F. (2020) · International Archives of Health Sciences · doi:10.4103/iahs.iahs_80_19 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Yu, L., Kioskli, K., Sibelli, A., & McCracken, L. M. (2026) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1002/ejp.70378
“Additionally, several studies have shown the improvements in PF processes following Acceptance and Committed Therapy (ACT; Hayes et al. 2011) for fibromyalgia (Gendreau et al. 2024; Luciano et al. 2014; Simister et al. 2018; Wicksell et al. 2013) and ACT for IBS (Ferreira et al. 2018).”
InfluentialSelinheimo, S., Vuokko, A., Lappalainen, P., Keinonen, K., Tolvanen, A. J., Lappalainen, R. I., Sainio, M., & Paunio, T. (2026) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12529-026-10477-z
Trindade, I. A., Pereira, A., Veloso, B., Gils, T. V., & Nybacka, S. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.02.23.26346871
Sirotiak, Z., Adamowicz, J. L., & Thomas, E. B. K. (2024) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-024-06794-9
“…reductions in mental health symptoms, including distress, anxiety, and depression, as well as improvements in fatigue and quality of life measures have been reported with ACT in these popu - lations (Ferreira et al., 2018; McCracken & Gutiérrez-Mar - tínez, 2011 ; Wicksell et al., 2013 ).”
InfluentialShakernejad, S., Khalatbari, J., & Alilou, M. M. (2021) · Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery · doi:10.32598/jhnm.31.4.2166
“The results show the effect of this method on the symptoms of IBS and cognitive avoidance, and the findings of the present study are consistent with this finding [20].”
Resultshakernezhad, S., Khalatbari, J., & Aliloo, M. M. (2021) · Depiction of Health · doi:10.34172/doh.2021.16
نصیری, ص., Ghorbani, M., & Adibi, P. (2018) · revista
- Authors
- Ferreira, N. B., Gillanders, D., Morris, P. G., & Eugenicos, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Ferreira, Nuno B.
- Venue
- Clinical Psychologist
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-07-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 241-250
- ISSN
- 1328-4207 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-9552
- OpenAlex
- W2602782306
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 4.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Clinical Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) (SFRH/BD/35966/2007)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- acceptance and commitment therapy, irritable bowel syndrome, acceptance of illness, avoidance behavior, quality of life, symptom severity, treatment process, self-help books, maintenance of treatment effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-30.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-30.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review