Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 223 of the 223 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diagnosis and treatment of community‐acquired pneumonia in adults: 2016 clinical practice guidelines by the Chinese Thoracic Society, Chinese Medical Association

Open access
Cao, Bin, Huang, Yi, She, Dan‐Yang, Cheng, Qi‐Jian, Fan, Hong, Tian, Xin‐Lun, Xu, Jin‐Fu, Zhang, Jing, Chen, Yu, Shen, Ning, Wang, Hui, Jiang, Mei, Zhang, Xiang‐Yan, Shi, Yi, He, Bei, He, Li‐Xian, Liu, You‐Ning, Qu, Jie‐Ming·2018·The Clinical Respiratory Journal

Abstract

Community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adults is an infectious disease with high morbidity in China and the rest of the world. With the changing pattern in the etiological profile of CAP and advances in medical techniques in diagnosis and treatment over time, Chinese Thoracic Society of Chinese Medical Association updated its CAP guideline in 2016 to address the standard management of CAP in Chinese adults. Extensive and comprehensive literature search was made to collect the data and evidence for experts to review and evaluate the level of evidence. Corresponding recommendations are provided appropriately based on the level of evidence. This updated guideline covers comprehensive topics on CAP, including aetiology, antimicrobial resistance profile, diagnosis, empirical and targeted treatments, adjunctive and supportive therapies, as well as prophylaxis. The recommendations may help clinicians manage CAP patients more effectively and efficiently. CAP in pediatric patients and immunocompromised adults is beyond the scope of this guideline. This guideline is only applicable for the immunocompetent CAP patients aged 18 years and older. The recommendations on selection of antimicrobial agents and the dosing regimens are not mandatory. The clinicians are recommended to prescribe and adjust antimicrobial therapies primarily based on their local etiological profile and results of susceptibility testing, with reference to this guideline.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/crj.12674

Cites

223 of 223 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 223 references

Cited by

See all 300

Metadata

Authors
Cao, B., Huang, Y., She, D., Cheng, Q., Fan, H., Tian, X., Xu, J., Zhang, J., Chen, Y., Shen, N., Wang, H., Jiang, M., Zhang, X., Shi, Y., He, B., He, L., Liu, Y., & Qu, J.
Venue
The Clinical Respiratory Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-09-26
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
1320-1360
ISSN
  • 1752-6981 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-699X
OpenAlex
W2741591398
Cited by
300
References
223
FWCI
10.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnosis and treatment of community‐acquired pneumonia in adults: 2016 clinical practice guidelines by the Chinese Thoracic Society, Chinese Medical Association. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/crj.12674
The paper
Cao, B., Huang, Y., She, D., Cheng, Q., Fan, H., Tian, X., Xu, J., Zhang, J., Chen, Y., Shen, N., Wang, H., Jiang, M., Zhang, X., Shi, Y., He, B., He, L., Liu, Y., & Qu, J. (2018). Diagnosis and treatment of community‐acquired pneumonia in adults: 2016 clinical practice guidelines by the Chinese Thoracic Society, Chinese Medical Association. The Clinical Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.12674

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.