Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 34

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sleep and circadian rhythms during pregnancy, social disadvantage, and alterations in brain development in neonates

Hoyniak, Caroline P., Whalen, Diana J., Luby, Joan L., Barch, Deanna M., Miller, J. Philip, Zhao, Peinan, Triplett, Regina L., Ju, Yo‐El, Smyser, Christopher D., Warner, Barbara, Rogers, Cynthia E., Herzog, Erik D., England, Sarah K.·2024·Developmental Science

Abstract

Pregnant women in poverty may be especially likely to experience sleep and circadian rhythm disturbances, which may have downstream effects on fetal neurodevelopment. However, the associations between sleep and circadian rhythm disturbances, social disadvantage during pregnancy, and neonatal brain structure remains poorly understood. The current study explored the association between maternal sleep and circadian rhythm disturbances during pregnancy and neonatal brain outcomes, examining sleep and circadian rhythm disturbances as a mediator of the effect of social disadvantage during pregnancy on infant structural brain outcomes. The study included 148 mother‐infant dyads, recruited during early pregnancy, who had both actigraphy and neuroimaging data. Mothers’ sleep was assessed throughout their pregnancy using actigraphy, and neonates underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging in the first weeks of life. Neonatal structural brain outcomes included cortical gray matter, subcortical gray matter, and white matter volumes along with a measure of the total surface area of the cortex. Neonates of mothers who experienced greater inter‐daily deviations in sleep duration had smaller total cortical gray and white matter volumes and reduced cortical surface areas. Neonates of mothers who had higher levels of circadian misalignment and later sleep timing during pregnancy showed smaller subcortical gray matter volumes. Inter‐daily deviations in sleep duration during pregnancy mediated the association between maternal social disadvantage and neonatal structural brain outcomes. Findings highlight the importance of regularity and rhythmicity in sleep schedules during pregnancy and bring to light the role of chronodisruption as a potential mechanism underlying the deleterious neurodevelopmental effects of prenatal adversity. Research Highlights: Social disadvantage was associated with sleep and circadian rhythm disturbances during pregnancy, including later sleep schedules, increased variability in sleep duration, circadian misalignment, and a higher proportion of the sleep period spent awake. Maternal sleep and circadian rhythm disturbances during pregnancy were associated with decreased brain volume and reduced cortical surface area in neonates. Maternal inter‐daily deviations in sleep duration during pregnancy mediated the association between social disadvantage and neonatal brain volume and cortical surface area.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/desc.13456

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. 10.1038/s41598-020-61326-2 · DOI
  2. 10.1017/s2040174421000581 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.068 · DOI
  4. 10.1257/jep.25.3.153 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2016.05.005 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/s41386-019-0476-7 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1111/jsr.12564 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2018.06.007 · DOI
  9. 10.1136/bmj.311.6998.171 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1542/neo.20-12-e686 · DOI
  11. 10.3389/fendo.2020.00198 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/desc.12344 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.chest.2020.09.249 · DOI
  14. 10.1177/0748730419835360 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.sleh.2019.03.005 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/cdep.12382 · DOI
  17. 10.1152/ajpregu.1988.255.3.R439 · DOI
  18. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.112001.112349 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2019.100040 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1093/sleep/zsab103 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/srep38601 · DOI
  22. 10.1073/pnas.1617698114 · DOI
  23. Hayes A. F., 2013, Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression‐based approach
  24. 10.1007/s40471-018-0139-y · DOI
  25. 10.2147/NSS.S226291 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Knickmeyer R. C., 2016, Impact of demographic and obstetric factors on infant brain volumes: A population neuroscience study, Cerebral Cortex, 27, 5616
  27. 10.1016/j.jand.2018.05.021 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Kushida C., 2013, Encyclopedia of sleep, 407
  29. 10.1038/s41598-020-64160-8 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/s41372-023-01643-2 · DOI
  31. 10.1177/0748730417728671 · DOI
  32. 10.1210/en.2016-1282 · DOI
  33. 10.1017/S0954579412000764 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/s41598-020-67852-3 · DOI
  35. 10.1111/1552-6909.12295 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1111/jsr.13135 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.019 · DOI
  38. 10.1126/science.2845576 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.08.001 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.2174/1381612822666151214104624 · DOI
  41. 10.1111/jcpp.12877 · DOI
  42. 10.1111/j.1479-8425.2011.00511.x · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.11.040 · DOI
  44. 10.1371/journal.pone.0272155 · DOI
  45. 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000770 · DOI
  46. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.7045 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1152/ajpregu.00248.2017 · DOI
  48. 10.1371/journal.pone.0018504 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1016/j.sleep.2022.04.002 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Hoyniak, C. P., Whalen, D. J., Luby, J. L., Barch, D. M., Miller, J. P., Zhao, P., Triplett, R. L., Ju, Y., Smyser, C. D., Warner, B., Rogers, C. E., Herzog, E. D., & England, S. K.
Venue
Developmental Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-10-30
Volume
27
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 1363-755X
  • 1467-7687
Cited by
34
References
8
Language
en
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23 MH118426, K23 MH127305, L30 MH108015, R01 MH11388, T32MH100019)
  • March of Dimes Foundation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.