Cited by 96Food composition and propertiesDiet, Metabolism, and DiseaseDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Glycaemic responses to glucose and rice in people of Chinese and European ethnicity

Kataoka, M., Venn, B. J., Williams, S. M., Te Morenga, L. A., Heemels, I. M., Mann, J. I.·2013·Diabetic Medicine

Abstract

Aims Diabetes rates are especially high in China. Risk of Type 2 diabetes increases with high intakes of white rice, a staple food of Chinese people. Ethnic differences in postprandial glycaemia have been reported. We compared glycaemic responses to glucose and five rice varieties in people of European and Chinese ethnicity and examined possible determinants of ethnic differences in postprandial glycaemia. Methods Self-identified Chinese (n = 32) and European (n = 31) healthy volunteers attended on eight occasions for studies following ingestion of glucose and jasmine, basmati, brown, Doongara(®) and parboiled rice. In addition to measuring glycaemic response, we investigated physical activity levels, extent of chewing of rice and salivary α-amylase activity to determine whether these measures explained any differences in postprandial glycaemia. Results Glycaemic response, measured by incremental area under the glucose curve, was over 60% greater for the five rice varieties (P Conclusions Glycaemic responses following ingestion of glucose and several rice varieties are appreciably greater in Chinese compared with Europeans, suggesting the need to review recommendations regarding dietary carbohydrate amongst rice-eating populations at high risk of diabetes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dme.12080

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kataoka, M., Venn, B. J., Williams, S. M., Te Morenga, L. A., Heemels, I. M., & Mann, J. I.
Affiliations
  • Riddet Institute (NZ)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • Department of Human Nutrition University of Otago Dunedin New Zealand
Corresponding author
Mann, J. I.
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-02-20
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
e101-7
ISSN
  • 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5491
OpenAlex
W2058460408
Cited by
96
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2
FWCI
6.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Riddet Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
postprandial glycaemia, rice, white rice, glucose, glycemic index, ethnic differences, Chinese ethnicity, type 2 diabetes risk, rice varieties, basmati rice, parboiled rice, brown rice, jasmine rice, salivary amylase, mastication, physical activity, dietary carbohydrates
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Blood Glucose, China, Female, Glucose, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New Zealand, Oryza, Sweetening Agents, Age Distribution, Postprandial Period, Area Under Curve, Glycemic Index, White People, Asian People, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review