Cited by 40Nutritional Studies and DietDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Long-term changes in dietary and food intake behaviour in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study

Open access
Jaacks, L. M., Ma, Y., Davis, N., Delahanty, L. M., Mayer‐Davis, E. J., Franks, P. W., Brown‐Friday, J., Isonaga, M. +4 more·2014·Diabetic Medicine

Abstract

AIMS: To compare change in dietary intake, with an emphasis on food groups and food intake behaviour, over time across treatment arms in a diabetes prevention trial and to assess the differences in dietary intake among demographic groups within treatment arms. METHODS: Data are from the Diabetes Prevention Program and Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. Participants were randomized to a lifestyle intervention (n = 1079), metformin (n = 1073) or placebo (n = 1082) for an average of 3 years, after which the initial results regarding the benefits of the lifestyle intervention were released and all participants were offered a modified lifestyle intervention. Dietary intake was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire at baseline and at 1, 5, 6 and 9 years after randomization. RESULTS: Compared with the metformin and placebo arms, participants in the lifestyle arm maintained a lower total fat and saturated fat and a higher fibre intake up to 9 years after randomization and lower intakes of red meat and sweets were maintained for up to 5 years. Younger participants had higher intakes of poultry and lower intakes of fruits compared with their older counterparts, particularly in the lifestyle arm. Black participants tended to have lower dairy and higher poultry intakes compared with white and Hispanic participants. In the lifestyle arm, men tended to have higher grain, fruit and fish intakes than women. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in nutrient intake among participants in the lifestyle intervention were maintained for up to 9 years. Younger participants reported more unhealthy diets over time and thus may benefit from additional support to achieve and maintain dietary goals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dme.12500

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Diet differences across intervention groups were negligible 9 years after randomization, so diet was not included in the model.

    “Although diet was assessed by food frequency questionnaire intermittently throughout DPP and DPPOS, there were negligible differences across intervention groups 9 years after randomization and, therefore, was not included in the model (15).”

    From The impact of physical activity on the prevention of type 2 diabetes: Evidence and lessons learned from the Diabetes Prevention Program, a long-standing clinical trial incorporating subjective and objective activity measures (2021) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Results (page not provided) report that lifestyle participants had lower total and saturated fat intake and higher fiber intake than the other groups up to nine years after randomization, contrary to the claim that dietary differences were negligible. The Methods (page not provided) describe models used to analyze dietary intake; the paper does not give the claimed rationale for excluding diet from the citing authors’ model. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jaacks, L. M., Ma, Y., Davis, N., Delahanty, L. M., Mayer‐Davis, E. J., Franks, P. W., Brown‐Friday, J., Isonaga, M., Kriska, A. M., Venditti, E. M., Wylie‐Rosett, J., & the Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx NY
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ma, Y.
  • Wylie‐Rosett, J.
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-07-05
Volume
31
Issue
12
Pages
1631-1642
ISSN
  • 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5491
OpenAlex
W2103694763
Cited by
40
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001073)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U01DK048489, P30DK017047)
  • NIH Clinical Center
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
dietary intake, type 2 diabetes prevention, lifestyle intervention, metformin, Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study, saturated fat intake, dietary fiber, red meat consumption, fruit consumption, age differences in diet, sex differences in diet, long-term dietary change
MeSH terms
Adult, Energy Intake, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Reducing, Dietary Fats, Dietary Fiber, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Fruit, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Metformin, Middle Aged, Vegetables, Diet, Fat-Restricted, Risk Reduction Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review