Cited by 19Digital Mental Health InterventionsDiabetes Management and EducationMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Exploring the views of adolescents with type 1 diabetes on digital mental health interventions: What functionality and content do they want?

Boggiss, Anna L., Consedine, Nathan S., Schache, Kiralee R., Wallace‐Boyd, Kate, Cao, Nicholas, Hofman, Paul L., Serlachius, Anna S.·2021·Diabetic Medicine

Abstract

Background Adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) experience higher rates of psychological disorders compared with their healthy peers. As poor psychological health has been associated with suboptimal glycaemic control and more frequent complications, there is an urgent need to develop more 'clinically usable' interventions. Digital mental health interventions offer unique advantages compared with in-person interventions; however, what adolescents with T1D want in terms of content and functionality is poorly understood. Accordingly, the current study conducted focus groups to examine the views of adolescents with T1D regarding digital mental health interventions. Methods Four focus groups were conducted, including 16 adolescents with T1D, ranging from 13 to 17 years in age (69% female). Transcripts were analysed using directed content analysis to examine (1) 'what adolescents dislike about existing digital mental health interventions?' and (2) 'what adolescents want in future digital mental health interventions?'. Results Findings provide a preliminary understanding of what adolescents dislike and also the type of content and functional features, which may be important to include in digital mental health programs for this population, such as a peer support feature (reported by 16 of 16), emotion and diabetes check-in feature (11 of 16) and diabetes-relevant content (12 of 16). Conclusions Early data suggest that digital mental health interventions should include a significant…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dme.14591

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boggiss, A. L., Consedine, N. S., Schache, K. R., Wallace‐Boyd, K., Cao, N., Hofman, P. L., & Serlachius, A. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • Tamaki Health Auckland New Zealand
Corresponding author
Boggiss, Anna L.
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-05-14
Volume
38
Issue
11
Pages
e14591-e14591
ISSN
  • 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5491
OpenAlex
W3158235687
Cited by
19
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, adolescents, digital mental health interventions, user preferences, peer support, diabetes self-management, mental health, intervention design
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Child, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Feasibility Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Peer Group, Time Factors, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review