Cited by 84Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDigital Mental Health InterventionsStudent Stress and Coping

App-based mindfulness meditation for psychological distress and adjustment to college in incoming university students: a pragmatic, randomised, waitlist-controlled trial

Flett, Jayde A. M., Conner, Tamlin S., Riordan, Benjamin C., Patterson, Tess, Hayne, Harlene·2020·Psychology & Health

Abstract

Objective and Design: In a pragmatic, randomised, waitlist-controlled trial we tracked 250 first-year university students who were randomly assigned to 3 months of a mindfulness meditation app (Headspace) to use at their discretion in either semester 1 (intervention, n = 124) or semester 2 (waitlist, n = 126). Main Outcome Measures: Students reported their distress, college adjustment, resilience, self-efficacy, and mindfulness, at 3 timepoints: the beginning of semester 1, the beginning of semester 2, and the end of the academic year. With participants’ permission, the university provided academic achievement data and Headspace provided app use data. Results: Evidence for improvements in distress at the beginning of semester 2 was weak (intervention vs. waitlist) and app use was low (M = 7.91, SD = 15.16 sessions). Nevertheless, intervention participants who used the app more frequently reported improvements in psychological distress (−5 points, R2 change = .12) and college adjustment (+10 points, R2 change = .09) when compared to non-users. App initiation and persistence beyond the first week was higher when the app was provided in semester 1 than semester 2 (66.1% vs. 44.4%; 46.0% vs. 32.5%). Conclusion: Headspace use was associated with small improvements in distress and college adjustment in first-year university students. Intervening at the beginning of the academic year may encourage uptake.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08870446.2019.1711089

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flett, J. A. M., Conner, T. S., Riordan, B. C., Patterson, T., & Hayne, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • North-West University (ZA)
Corresponding author
Flett, Jayde A. M.
Venue
Psychology & Health
Published
2020-02-12
Volume
35
Issue
9
Pages
1049-1074
ISSN
  • 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8321
OpenAlex
W3005590806
Cited by
84
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 4
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
mindfulness meditation, Headspace app, mobile health, psychological distress, college adjustment, first-year students, resilience, self-efficacy, intervention uptake, intervention persistence, academic performance
MeSH terms
Emotional Adjustment, Psychological Distress, Adolescent, Female, Humans, Male, New Zealand, Psychotherapy, Students, Universities, Waiting Lists, Treatment Outcome, Meditation, Young Adult, Mobile Applications, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review