Cited by 60Diet and metabolism studiesDietary Effects on HealthBariatric Surgery and Outcomes

Efficacy and acceptability of very low energy diets in overweight and obese people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review with meta‐analyses

Open access
Rehackova, L., Arnott, B., Araujo‐Soares, V., Adamson, A. A., Taylor, R., Sniehotta, F. F.·2016·Diabetic Medicine

Abstract

Aims: To explore the efficacy and acceptability of very low energy diets in overweight or obese adults with Type 2 diabetes. Methods: Controlled trials and qualitative studies of individuals with Type 2 diabetes that compared very low energy diets with standard care, minimal interventions, other weight loss interventions, less intensive very low energy diet interventions and very low energy diets with additional components were eligible for inclusion. Meta‐analyses of changes in weight, blood glucose levels and attrition rates were performed. Acceptability of very low energy diets was assessed by attrition rates, number and severity of side effects, and by qualitative evaluations of the interventions. Results: Four randomized, five non‐randomized controlled trials and no qualitative studies (21 references, 9 studies, 346 participants) were identified. Meta‐analyses showed that very low energy diets induced greater weight losses than minimal interventions, standard care or low energy diets at 3 and 6 months. No conclusive evidence for differences in outcomes between very low energy diets and Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass surgery was found. Greater differences in energy prescription between intervention and comparator arms were associated with greater differences in weight loss and fasting blood glucose levels at 3 months. Attrition rates did not differ between the very low energy diets and the comparator arms at any measurement point. Conclusions: Very low energy diets are effective in substantial weight loss among people with Type 2 diabetes. Levels of adherence to very low energy diets in controlled studies appear to be high, although details about behaviour support provided are usually poorly described.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dme.13005

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rehackova, L., Arnott, B., Araujo‐Soares, V., Adamson, A. A., Taylor, R., & Sniehotta, F. F.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Institute of Health and Society Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne UK
Corresponding author
Sniehotta, F. F.
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-12-12
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
580-591
ISSN
  • 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5491
OpenAlex
W1905573047
Cited by
60
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • Newcastle University
  • British Heart Foundation
  • Cancer Research UK
  • Economic and Social Research Council
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Institute for Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Keywords
very low calorie diet, type 2 diabetes, obesity, overweight, weight loss, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, fasting blood glucose, attrition rates, dietary adherence, adverse effects, behavioral support
MeSH terms
Energy Intake, Combined Modality Therapy, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Diabetic, Diet, Reducing, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Middle Aged, Obesity, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Compliance, Patient Dropouts, Weight Loss, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Overweight, Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review