Cited by 87Pharmacology and Obesity TreatmentBariatric Surgery and OutcomesObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Feasibility and indicative results from a 12-month low-energy liquid diet treatment and maintenance programme for severe obesity

Open access
Lean, Michael, Brosnahan, Naomi, McLoone, Philip, McCombie, Louise, Higgs, Anna Bell, Ross, Hazel, Mackenzie, Mhairi, Grieve, Eleanor +5 more·2013·British Journal of General Practice

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no established primary care solution for the rapidly increasing numbers of severely obese people with body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m(2). AIM: This programme aimed to generate weight losses of ≥15 kg at 12 months, within routine primary care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Feasibility study in primary care. METHOD: Patients with a BMI ≥40 kg/m(2) commenced a micronutrient-replete 810-833 kcal/day low-energy liquid diet (LELD), delivered in primary care, for a planned 12 weeks or 20 kg weight loss (whichever was the sooner), with structured food reintroduction and then weight-loss maintenance, with optional orlistat to 12 months. RESULT: Of 91 patients (74 females) entering the programme (baseline: weight 131 kg, BMI 48 kg/m(2), age 46 years), 58/91(64%) completed the LELD stage, with a mean duration of 14.4 weeks (standard deviation [SD] = 6.0 weeks), and a mean weight loss of 16.9 kg (SD = 6.0 kg). Four patients commenced weight-loss maintenance omitting the food-reintroduction stage. Of the remaining 54, 37(68%) started and completed food reintroduction over a mean duration of 9.3 weeks (SD = 5.7 weeks), with a further mean weight loss of 2.1 kg (SD = 3.7 kg), before starting a long-term low-fat-diet weight-loss maintenance plan. A total of 44/91 (48%) received orlistat at some stage. At 12 months, weight was recorded for 68/91 (75%) patients, with a mean loss of 12.4 kg (SD = 11.4 kg). Of these, 30 (33% of all 91 patients starting the programme) had a documented maintained weight loss of ≥15 kg at 12 months, six (7%) had a 10-15 kg loss, and 11 (12%) had a 5-10 kg loss. The indicative cost of providing this entire programme for wider implementation would be £861 per patient entered, or £2611 per documented 15 kg loss achieved. CONCLUSION: A care package within routine primary care for severe obesity, including LELD, food reintroduction, and weight-loss maintenance, was well accepted and achieved a 12-month-maintained weight loss of ≥15 kg for one-third of all patients entering the programme.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3399/bjgp13x663073

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For participants who ceased to engage and did not attend their 12 month trial appointment, data from GP records within a window of plus or minus 3 months of the scheduled follow-up date were used if available, as pre-specified in the protocol.

    “For participants who ceased to engage and did not attend their 12 month trial appointment, data from GP records (within a window of plus or minus 3 months of the scheduled follow-up date) were used if available, as pre-specified in the protocol.11”

    From Primary care-led weight management for remission of type 2 diabetes (DiRECT): an open-label, cluster-randomised trial (2018) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Outcome evaluations for analysis section says 12-month weights were taken within ±90 days of 365 days from baseline, and that weights for patients lost to follow-up were obtained opportunistically from health-professional measurements outside the study. It does not specify GP records, a missed trial appointment, or that this approach was pre-specified in a protocol. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [23]23. Lau S, Caterson ID. Meal replacement products and very low calorie diets in adult obesity. Bull R Coll Pathol 2011; 155: 172-174.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lean, M., Brosnahan, N., McLoone, P., McCombie, L., Higgs, A. B., Ross, H., Mackenzie, M., Grieve, E., Finer, N., Reckless, J., Haslam, D., Sloan, B., & Morrison, D.
Affiliations
Royal United Hospital (GB)
Venue
British Journal of General Practice
Published
2013-02
Volume
63
Issue
607
Pages
e115-e124
ISSN
  • 0960-1643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-5242
OpenAlex
W2160489098
Cited by
87
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4
FWCI
5.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of General Practice (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
obesity, weight loss, weight loss maintenance, food reintroduction, orlistat, feasibility, cost analysis
MeSH terms
Orlistat, Adult, Diet, Reducing, Feasibility Studies, Feeding Behavior, Feeding Methods, Female, Humans, Lactones, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Morbid, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Weight Loss, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Micronutrients, Anti-Obesity Agents, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review