Cited by 25Diabetes Treatment and ManagementMetabolism, Diabetes, and CancerBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments

Comparative safety of pioglitazone versus clinically meaningful treatment alternatives concerning the risk of bladder cancer in older US adults with type 2 diabetes

Open access
Garry, Elizabeth M., Buse, John B., Lund, Jennifer L., Pate, Virginia, Stürmer, Til·2018·Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism

Abstract

Aims: To compare bladder cancer incidence between patients initiating pioglitazone treatment and patients initiating treatment with dipeptidyl‐peptidase‐4 inhibitors [DPP‐4s] or sulfonylureas. Methods: We identified M edicare beneficiaries aged >65 years who initiated treatment with pioglitazone ( N = 38 700), DPP‐4s ( N = 82 552) or sulfonylureas ( N = 126 104) between 2007 and 2014 after at least 6 months without prescriptions for these drug classes. Patients were followed from second prescription until bladder cancer outcome (2 claims within 60 days) using a 6‐month induction/latency period, censoring for treatment change, death or end of 2014. We used propensity score‐weighted C ox proportional‐hazards models to obtain adjusted hazard ratios (a HR ) and their 95% confidence intervals. Results: Overall mean age of participants was 75 years and 41% were men. Over a median of 1.2 treatment years, 727 beneficiaries developed bladder cancer. Pioglitazone initiators had an increased incidence of bladder cancer (308 vs 204 [DPP‐4s] or 231 [sulfonylureas] per 100 000 person‐years; aHR, 1.57 [1.23‐2.00] vs DPP‐4s and 1.32 [1.02‐1.70] vs sulfonylureas). The increased risk emerged within the first 2 years of treatment (aHR, 1.63 [1.22‐2.17] vs DPP‐4s and 1.32 [0.98‐1.78] vs sulfonylureas). If treatment was discontinued within the first 2 years, the risk after 2 years post initiation was attenuated (aHR, 0.89 [0.61‐1.28]) compared with patients treated for more than 2 years (aHR, 1.45 [0.93‐2.26]) both vs DPP‐4s. Findings were consistent across secondary and sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: Pioglitazone was associated with an elevated risk of bladder cancer compared with DPP‐4s and sulfonylureas. The elevated risk emerged within the first 2 years of treatment and was attenuated after discontinuing. Pioglitazone's relative effectiveness should be weighed against a small absolute increase in risk of bladder cancer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dom.13049

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A decreased risk of colorectal adenomas and colorectal carcinoma is a consistent finding with metformin, with potential survival benefit for colorectal carcinoma.

    “A decreased risk of colorectal adenomas and colorectal carcinoma is a consistent finding with a potential for a survival benefit for colorectal carcinoma.1784–1790”

    From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [1786]

    The Discussion addresses bladder-cancer risk associated with pioglitazone, and the Methods mention metformin only in relation to cohort selection. Searches for colorectal adenomas, colorectal cancer, and survival benefit found no passage addressing the claim. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [5]Federal Drug Administration. Actos (pioglitazone): Ongoing Safety Review - Potential Increased Risk of Bladder Cancer. MedWatch Safety Alerts for Human Medical Products: 2011 Safety Alerts for Human Medical Products. 2011.
  2. [6]Federal Drug Administration,,. FDA Drug Safety Communication: Updated FDA review concludes that use of type 2 diabetes medicine pioglitazone may be linked to an increased risk of bladder cancer. 12/12/2016 2016.
  3. [25]American Cancer Society. Bladder Cancer: Detailed Guide. Last Medical Review: 2/26/2014 2014.
  4. [30]Gokhale M, Buse JB, Mack C, Stürmer T. Calendar Time as an Instrumental Variable in Assessing the Risk of Heart Failure with Antihyperglycemic Drugs [abstract]. In: Abstracts of the 32nd International Conference on Pharmacoepidemiology & Therapeutic Risk Management, The Convention Centre Dublin, Dublin, Ireland August 25–28, 2016. Abstract nr 712016;No Suppl 3: 3– 679. doi: 610.1002/pds.4070. Located at: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garry, E. M., Buse, J. B., Lund, J. L., Pate, V., & Stürmer, T.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Department of Epidemiology University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina
Corresponding author
Garry, Elizabeth M.
Venue
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-08-08
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
129-140
ISSN
  • 1462-8902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-1326
OpenAlex
W2728654432
Cited by
25
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • Pharmacoepidemiology Gillings Innovation Lab (PEGIL) (200811.0010)
  • Center for Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Epidemiology
  • University ofNorth Carolina (UNC) Gillings School of Global Public Health
  • CER Strategic Initiative of UNC's Clinical and Translational Science Award (UL1TR001111)
  • Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services
  • UNC School of Medicine
  • National Institute on Aging (RO1 AG023178)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Keywords
pioglitazone, bladder cancer, type 2 diabetes, older adults, DPP-4 inhibitors, sulfonylureas, drug safety, cancer risk, treatment discontinuation, thiazolidinediones, antidiabetic drugs, Medicare beneficiaries, propensity score matching, hazard ratio, drug-induced cancer risk, drug repurposing
MeSH terms
Pioglitazone, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Medicare, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Drug Prescriptions, Risk, Sulfonylurea Compounds, United States, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Proportional Hazards Models, Thiazolidinediones, Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors, Electronic Health Records, Pharmacovigilance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review