Cited by 51Regulation of Appetite and ObesityDiabetes Treatment and ManagementPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Tirzepatide suppresses palatable food intake by selectively reducing preference for fat in rodents

Open access
Geisler, Caroline E., Antonellis, Meghan P., Trumbauer, Wolfgang, Martin, Jennifer A., Coskun, Tamer, Samms, Ricardo J., Hayes, Matthew R.·2023·Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the role of glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) agonists alone or combined with glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor (GLP‐1R) agonists to regulate palatable food intake and the role of specific macronutrients in these preferences. Methods: To understand this regulation, we treated mice and rats on several choice diet paradigms of chow and a palatable food option with individual or dual GIPR and GLP‐1R agonists. Results: In mice, the dual agonist tirzepatide suppressed total caloric intake, while promoting the intake of chow over a high fat/sucrose diet. Surprisingly, GIPR agonism alone did not alter food choice. The food intake shift observed with tirzepatide in wild‐type mice was completely absent in GLP‐1R knockout mice, suggesting that GIPR signalling does not regulate food preference. Tirzepatide also selectively suppressed the intake of palatable food but not chow in a rat two‐diet choice model. This suppression was specific to lipids, as GLP‐1R agonist and dual agonist treatment in rats on a choice paradigm assessing individual palatable macronutrients robustly inhibited the intake of Crisco (lipid) without decreasing the intake of a sucrose (carbohydrate) solution. Conclusions: Decreasing preference for high‐caloric, high‐fat foods is a powerful action of GLP‐1R and dual GIPR/GLP‐1R agonist therapeutics, which may contribute to the weight loss success of these drugs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dom.14843

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bariatric surgery still stands as the benchmark for weight loss, triggering weight reduction of approximately 25-30% within a 1-2 year period.

    “In conclusion, bariatric surgery still stands as the benchmark for weight loss, triggering weight reduction of ~25-30% within a 1-2 year period175.”

    From Transforming obesity: The advancement of multi-receptor drugs (2024) · cites this paper as [175]

    The Results describe tirzepatide-related weight loss in mice and rats over days or weeks, not outcomes after bariatric surgery. Searches for bariatric surgery, a 25–30% reduction, and a 1–2-year period found no passage in our copy addressing the claim. Page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The ability of these medications to selectively reduce the intake of high-fat, high-sugar palatable foods makes them strategic in nutritional re-education.

    “The ability of these medications to selectively reduce the intake of high-fat, high-sugar palatable foods [60,61,75] makes them strategic in nutritional re-education.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geisler, C. E., Antonellis, M. P., Trumbauer, W., Martin, J. A., Coskun, T., Samms, R. J., & Hayes, M. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • Diabetes, Obesity and Complications, Lilly Research Laboratories Eli Lilly and Company Indianapolis Indiana
Corresponding author
Hayes, Matthew R.
Venue
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-09-12
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
56-67
ISSN
  • 1462-8902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-1326
OpenAlex
W4292509485
Cited by
51
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK021397)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
tirzepatide, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor, GLP-1 receptor, GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist, palatable food intake, food preferences, fat preference, high-fat sucrose diet, macronutrient intake, energy intake, weight loss
MeSH terms
Animals, Eating, Rodentia, Weight Loss, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review