Cited by 23Disability Education and EmploymentSchizophrenia research and treatmentPsychiatric care and mental health services

Improving vocational outcomes of service users in an E arly I ntervention in P sychosis service

Open access
Dudley, Robert, Nicholson, Marsha, Stott, Pauline, Spoors, George·2014·Early Intervention in Psychiatry

Abstract

Aim: People with psychotic symptoms have poor social and occupational functioning. The aim of this research was to improve the engagement in meaningful education, training or employment for young people with psychosis. This was undertaken by introducing a vocational specialist into the early intervention service to implement the individual placement and support ( IPS ) model. Methods: Two early intervention services provided information about the vocational status of their service users 6 and 1 months prior to the introduction of the vocational specialist into one of the services. Data were collected again 12 months following the intervention and then 6 months following the end of the intervention. Results: Unemployment was high in both services during the baseline period (approximately 75% in both), but in the service receiving the intervention this reduced to 62% whereas it remained high in the service that did not introduce the vocational specialist. Following the withdrawal of the vocational specialist the improvement was lost. Conclusions: To enable people in first‐episode services to live meaningful and valued lives occupational functioning needs to be considered a key performance indicator. Services can improve outcome by implementing and maintaining the IPS model.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/eip.12043

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 10 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dudley, R., Nicholson, M., Stott, P., & Spoors, G.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Department for Work and Pensions (GB)
  • Mental Health Care Sunderland UK
Corresponding author
Dudley, Robert
Venue
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-03-14
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
98-102
ISSN
  • 1751-7885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7893
OpenAlex
W2140435730
Cited by
23
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Early Intervention in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
early intervention in psychosis, Individual Placement and Support, vocational rehabilitation, employment effects, unemployment, first-episode psychosis, young people with psychosis, occupational functioning, service user engagement
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Educational Status, Employment, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Psychotic Disorders, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Young Adult, Early Medical Intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review