Cited by 98Schizophrenia research and treatmentDisability Education and EmploymentPsychiatric care and mental health services

What are the benefits of evidence-based supported employment for patients with first-episode psychosis?

Open access
Rinaldi, Miles, Mcneil, Karen, Firn, Mike, Koletsi, Marsha, Perkins, Rachel, Singh, Swaran P.·2004·Psychiatric Bulletin

Abstract

Aims and Method: To examine the effectiveness of integrating evidence-based supported employment into an early intervention service for young people with first-episode psychosis. Demographic, clinical and vocational data were collected over a 12-month period to evaluate the effect on vocational outcomes at 6 months and 12 months of the employment of a vocational specialist, and to assess model fidelity. Results: Following vocational profiling and input from the vocational specialist and the team, there were significant increases in the proportion of clients engaged in work or educational activity over the first 6 months of the intervention, and in a subsample over a second 6-month period. The evidence-based Supported Employment Fidelity Scale was used to measure the degree of implementation, which scored 71, signifying ‘good implementation’. Clinical Implications: The results suggest that implementing evidence-based supported employment within an early intervention service increases employment and education opportunities for patients within the service.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/pb.28.8.281

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This research rarely reports high implementation fidelity.

    “Moreover, this research rarely reports high implementation fidelity [8,29,40].”

    From A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity (2007) · cites this paper as [40]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 18 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rinaldi, M., Mcneil, K., Firn, M., Koletsi, M., Perkins, R., & Singh, S. P.
Affiliations
  • Springfield University Hospital (GB)
  • St George's, University of London (GB)
  • Mental Health Services (DK)
  • South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust (GB)
Venue
Psychiatric Bulletin
Published
2004-08
Volume
28
Issue
8
Pages
281-284
ISSN
  • 0955-6036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1473
OpenAlex
W2162028657
Cited by
98
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Psychiatric Bulletin (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
supported employment, first-episode psychosis, early intervention, vocational rehabilitation, model fidelity, employment effects, academic engagement, young people with psychosis, implementation fidelity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review