Cited by 12Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health servicesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

A longitudinal study of headspace youth oriented mental health service satisfaction, service utilization and clinical characteristics

Open access
Ishay, Gili Hoter, Zisman‐Ilani, Yaara, Roe, David·2023·Early Intervention in Psychiatry

Abstract

Aim: This study examined satisfaction with accessibility, staff attitudes, personal outcomes service components of youth‐oriented mental health service, Headspace, and those components' associations with psychological distress and functional status at intake, service utilization patterns and demographic characteristics at middle and end of treatment. Methods: Data were collected between March 2016 and June 2018 from 112 participants (12–25 years) who consented and completed at least seven sessions at the Headspace youth integrated‐care centre in Israel using the centre's registries and the Youth Service Satisfaction Scale. Results: Headspace participants attended an average of 12 sessions (SD = 3.12), they waited up to 2 weeks for their first intake (n = 57; 73%), after which most were offered a psychotherapy session (n = 80, 71%) within 2 months. Participants' satisfaction with Headspace was above the mid‐point for all service aspects. The overall effect for time was not significant, F(1) = 1.14, p > .05. However, a significant increase in satisfaction with personal outcomes was found between the middle and the end of treatment, F(2,4) = 3.11, p < .05 compared to all other aspects. The length of waiting time, level of distress, number of sessions attended by parents and age were correlated with satisfaction. Correlations were found with waiting time, distress level, number of sessions attended by parents and age. Conclusions: High levels of satisfaction with Headspace service aspects strengthens the evidence for areas of importance in designing youth mental health services: youth‐friendly staff, general environment, accessibility and outcomes achievement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/eip.13347

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In headspace Israel, the service has increased the accessibility and familiarity of mental health services available to young people and has high satisfaction.

    “the service has increased the accessibility and familiarity of mental health services available to young people and has high satisfaction”

    From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024) · cites this paper as [314]

    Section 3.4 reports high satisfaction with Headspace Israel, including satisfaction with the centre’s accessibility. The Methods section measures accessibility through waiting times, but the paper does not show that the service increased access to mental health services or young people’s familiarity with them. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In headspace Israel, 66% present with high or very high severity of distress.

    “66% present with high or very high severity of distress”

    From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024) · cites this paper as [314]

    Section 2.2.1 says the study measured psychological distress among Headspace clients in Israel, and Table 1 reports a mean K10 score of 28.11. Neither gives the proportion presenting with high or very high distress; searches for “66%” and “very high severity” found no such figure in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ishay, G. H., Zisman‐Ilani, Y., & Roe, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Haifa (IL)
  • Temple University (US)
Corresponding author
Ishay, Gili Hoter
Venue
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-08-18
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
404-411
ISSN
  • 1751-7885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7893
OpenAlex
W4293790297
Cited by
12
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Early Intervention in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TUScholarShare (Temple University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Insurance Institute of Israel
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
child and adolescent mental health services, headspace, service satisfaction, service utilization, waiting time, psychological distress, functional status, psychotherapy, integrated care, service design, adolescents and young adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Mental Health Services, Personal Satisfaction, Psychotherapy, Adolescent Health Services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review