Cited by 71Epilepsy research and treatmentChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeHealth Education and Validation

Validation of the Peds QL Epilepsy Module: A pediatric epilepsy‐specific health‐related quality of life measure

Open access
Modi, Avani C., Junger, Katherine F., Mara, Constance A., Kellermann, Tanja, Barrett, Lauren, Wagner, Janelle, Mucci, Grace A., Bailey, Laurie +10 more·2017·Epilepsia

Abstract

Summary: Objective: To validate a brief and reliable epilepsy‐specific, health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) measure in children with various seizure types, treatments, and demographic characteristics. Methods: This national validation study was conducted across five epilepsy centers in the United States. Youth 5–18 years and caregivers of youth 2–18 years diagnosed with epilepsy completed the Peds QL Epilepsy Module and additional questionnaires to establish reliability and validity of the epilepsy‐specific HRQOL instrument. Demographic and medical data were collected through chart reviews. Factor analysis was conducted, and internal consistency (Cronbach's alphas), test–retest reliability, and construct validity were assessed. Results: Questionnaires were analyzed from 430 children with epilepsy (M age = 9.9 years; range 2–18 years; 46% female; 62% white: non‐Hispanic; 76% monotherapy, 54% active seizures) and their caregivers. The final Peds QL Epilepsy Module is a 29‐item measure with five subscales (i.e., Impact, Cognitive, Sleep, Executive Functioning, and Mood/Behavior) with parallel child and caregiver reports. Internal consistency coefficients ranged from 0.70–0.94. Construct validity and convergence was demonstrated in several ways, including strong relationships with seizure outcomes, antiepileptic drug (AED) side effects, and well‐established measures of executive, cognitive, and emotional/behavioral functioning. Significance: The Peds QL Epilepsy Module is a reliable measure of HRQOL with strong evidence of its validity across the epilepsy spectrum in both clinical and research settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/epi.13875

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Epilepsy-specific HRQoL measures are more salient to specific aspects of epilepsy and its treatments and thus constitute a particularly sensitive and responsive patient-reported outcome for people with epilepsy.

    “Epilepsy-specific HRQoL measures are more salient to specific aspects of epilepsy and its treatments and thus constitute a particularly sensitive and responsive patient-reported outcome for PWE. 9,10”

    From Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of psychological treatments for people with epilepsy on health-related quality of life (2018) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Abstract (page not provided) describes HRQoL as a patient-reported outcome and says an epilepsy-specific measure can assess the impact of epilepsy and its treatments on children’s daily functioning. The Discussion (page not provided) reports that the PedsQL Epilepsy Module distinguishes clinically meaningful groups. The paper validates a pediatric measure, however; it does not establish that epilepsy-specific measures generally are particularly responsive to change for all people with epilepsy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Varni JW, Limbers CA, Sorensen LG, et al. PedsQL Cognitive Func- tioning Scale in pediatric liver transplant recipients: feasibility, relia- bility, and validity. Qual Life Res 2011;20:913-921.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Modi, A. C., Junger, K. F., Mara, C. A., Kellermann, T., Barrett, L., Wagner, J., Mucci, G. A., Bailey, L., Almane, D., Guilfoyle, S. M., Urso, L., Hater, B., Hustzi, H., Smith, G., Herrmann, B., Perry, M. S., Zupanc, M., & Varni, J. W.
Affiliations
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • Children's Hospital of Orange County (US)
  • Cook Children's Health Care System (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Modi, Avani C.
Venue
Epilepsia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-09-13
Volume
58
Issue
11
Pages
1920-1930
ISSN
  • 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1167
OpenAlex
W2755028539
Cited by
71
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2
FWCI
5.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epilepsia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
pediatric epilepsy, health-related quality of life, children and adolescents, caregivers, antiepileptic drug adverse effects, executive function, sleep, cognitive function, mood and behavior, seizure outcome
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Epilepsy, Female, Humans, Male, Pediatrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review