Cited by 55Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer StudiesOptical Coherence Tomography ApplicationsSkin Protection and Aging

Imaging actinic keratosis by high‐definition optical coherence tomography. Histomorphologic correlation: a pilot study

Boone, Marc A. L. M., Norrenberg, Sarah, Jemec, Gregor B. E., Del Marmol, Veronique·2013·Experimental Dermatology

Abstract

With the continued development of non‐invasive therapies for actinic keratosis such as PDT and immune therapies, the non‐invasive diagnosis and monitoring become increasingly relevant. High‐definition optical coherence tomography is a high‐resolution imaging tool, with micrometre resolution in both transversal and axial directions, enable to visualize individual cells up to a depth of around 570 μm filling the imaging gap between conventional optical coherence tomography and reflectance confocal microscopy. We sought to determine the feasibility of detecting and grading of actinic keratosis by this technique using criteria defined for reflectance confocal microscopy compared to histology. In this pilot study, skin lesions of 17 patients with a histologically proven actinic keratosis were imaged by high‐definition optical coherence tomography just before excision and images analysed qualitatively. The surrounding normal looking skin has been used as control group. In lesional skin, dyskeratotic and atypical keratinocytes could be noticed with this new technique. An atypical honeycomb pattern in variable degree or a disarranged epidermal pattern could be observed. A good correlation between the dimension of atypia and/or disarrangement of the spinous–granular layer on en face images and the histopathological grading could be demonstrated. Relevant cross‐sectional imaging criteria could be defined for the different histopathological variants of actinic keratoses. The surrounding skin displayed features of photodamage. Using features already suggested by reflectance confocal microscopy, the study implies that high‐definition optical coherence tomography facilitates in vivo diagnosis of actinic keratosis and allows the grading of different actinic keratosis lesions for increased clinical utility.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/exd.12074

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boone, M. A. L. M., Norrenberg, S., Jemec, G. B. E., & Del Marmol, V.
Affiliations
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Dermatology Department Hôpital Erasme Université Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium
Corresponding author
Boone, Marc A. L. M.
Venue
Experimental Dermatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01-10
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
93-97
ISSN
  • 0906-6705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0625
OpenAlex
W1984611953
Cited by
55
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3
FWCI
5.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Optical Coherence Tomography Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
Keywords
actinic keratosis, high-definition optical coherence tomography, non-invasive diagnosis, histopathological grading, photodamage, in vivo skin imaging, reflectance confocal microscopy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Precancerous Conditions, Skin, Reproducibility of Results, Microscopy, Confocal, Tomography, Optical Coherence, Keratosis, Actinic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review