Cited by 48Dermatology and Skin DiseasesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsContact Dermatitis and Allergies

Coping as mediator of the relationship between stress and itch in patients with atopic dermatitis: a regression and mediation analysis

Open access
Schut, Christina, Weik, Ulrike, Tews, Natalia, Gieler, Uwe, Deinzer, Renate, Kupfer, Jörg·2015·Experimental Dermatology

Abstract

Even though it has been shown that stress and itch are associated in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), it remains unclear whether this relationship occurs due to certain coping strategies being activated under stress. Therefore, this study investigates the role of coping as possible mediating factor between stress and itch in 31 patients with AD. Coping and itch were assessed by self-reported measures, while stress was measured both by a validated questionnaire and by a physiological stress marker, the postawakening cortisol. Using a regression and a mediation analysis, this study showed a relationship between perceived stress and itch (corrected R2 = 0.21), which was fully mediated by negative itch-related cognitions. 62.3% of the variance of itch intensity could be explained by negative itch-related cognitions. This finding helps to explain the positive effects of cognitive restructuring in the treatment of chronic itch.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/exd.12578

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schut, C., Weik, U., Tews, N., Gieler, U., Deinzer, R., & Kupfer, J.
Affiliations
  • Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
  • Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Schut, Christina
Venue
Experimental Dermatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-11-18
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
148-150
ISSN
  • 0906-6705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0625
OpenAlex
W2049489020
Cited by
48
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5
FWCI
4.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Experimental Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
Keywords
atopic dermatitis, pruritus, stress, coping, perceived stress, chronic pruritus, cognitive restructuring, mediation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Cognition, Dermatitis, Atopic, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Perception, Pruritus, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Saliva, Stress, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review