Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 555

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multimodel ensembles of wheat growth: many models are better than one

Open access
Martre, Pierre, Wallach, Daniel, Asseng, Senthold, Ewert, Frank, Jones, James W., Rötter, Reimund P., Boote, Kenneth J., Ruane, Alex C., Thorburn, Peter J., Cammarano, Davide, Hatfield, Jerry L., Rosenzweig, Cynthia, Aggarwal, Pramod K., Angulo, Carlos, Basso, Bruno, Bertuzzi, Patrick, Biernath, Christian, Brisson, Nadine, Challinor, Andrew J., Doltra, Jordi, Gayler, Sebastian, Goldberg, Richie, Grant, Robert F., Heng, Lee, Hooker, Josh, Hunt, Leslie A., Ingwersen, Joachim, Izaurralde, Roberto C., Kersebaum, Kurt Christian, Müller, Christoph, Kumar, Soora Naresh, Nendel, Claas, O'leary, Garry, Olesen, Jørgen E., Osborne, Tom M., Palosuo, Taru, Priesack, Eckart, Ripoche, Dominique, Semenov, Mikhail A., Shcherbak, Iurii, Steduto, Pasquale, Stöckle, Claudio O., Stratonovitch, Pierre, Streck, Thilo, Supit, Iwan, Tao, Fulu, Travasso, Maria, Waha, Katharina, White, Jeffrey W., Wolf, Joost·2015·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Crop models of crop growth are increasingly used to quantify the impact of global changes due to climate or crop management. Therefore, accuracy of simulation results is a major concern. Studies with ensembles of crop models can give valuable information about model accuracy and uncertainty, but such studies are difficult to organize and have only recently begun. We report on the largest ensemble study to date, of 27 wheat models tested in four contrasting locations for their accuracy in simulating multiple crop growth and yield variables. The relative error averaged over models was 24–38% for the different end‐of‐season variables including grain yield (GY) and grain protein concentration (GPC). There was little relation between error of a model for GY or GPC and error for in‐season variables. Thus, most models did not arrive at accurate simulations of GY and GPC by accurately simulating preceding growth dynamics. Ensemble simulations, taking either the mean (e‐mean) or median (e‐median) of simulated values, gave better estimates than any individual model when all variables were considered. Compared to individual models, e‐median ranked first in simulating measured GY and third in GPC. The error of e‐mean and e‐median declined with an increasing number of ensemble members, with little decrease beyond 10 models. We conclude that multimodel ensembles can be used to create new estimators with improved accuracy and consistency in simulating growth dynamics. We argue that these results are applicable to other crop species, and hypothesize that they apply more generally to ecological system models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/gcb.12768

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 82 references

Cited by

See all 555

Metadata

Authors
Martre, P., Wallach, D., Asseng, S., Ewert, F., Jones, J. W., Rötter, R. P., Boote, K. J., Ruane, A. C., Thorburn, P. J., Cammarano, D., Hatfield, J. L., Rosenzweig, C., Aggarwal, P. K., Angulo, C., Basso, B., Bertuzzi, P., Biernath, C., Brisson, N., Challinor, A. J., Doltra, J., Gayler, S., Goldberg, R., Grant, R. F., Heng, L., Hooker, J., Hunt, L. A., Ingwersen, J., Izaurralde, R. C., Kersebaum, K. C., Müller, C., Kumar, S. N., Nendel, C., O'leary, G., Olesen, J. E., Osborne, T. M., Palosuo, T., Priesack, E., Ripoche, D., Semenov, M. A., Shcherbak, I., Steduto, P., Stöckle, C. O., Stratonovitch, P., Streck, T., Supit, I., Tao, F., Travasso, M., Waha, K., White, J. W., & Wolf, J.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-12-03
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
911-925
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2153328324
Cited by
555
References
82
FWCI
42.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multimodel ensembles of wheat growth: many models are better than one. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/gcb.12768
The paper
Martre, P., Wallach, D., Asseng, S., Ewert, F., Jones, J. W., Rötter, R. P., Boote, K. J., Ruane, A. C., Thorburn, P. J., Cammarano, D., Hatfield, J. L., Rosenzweig, C., Aggarwal, P. K., Angulo, C., Basso, B., Bertuzzi, P., Biernath, C., Brisson, N., Challinor, A. J., . . . Wolf, J. (2015). Multimodel ensembles of wheat growth: many models are better than one. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12768

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.