The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Institutional life within an entrepreneurial region
Open accessAbstract
Institutions are often regarded as static and unchanging, portrayed as constraints on innovation, entrepreneurship, and regional economic change. We propose an alternative perspective in order to understand how entrepreneurs experience and engage with institutions in ways that shape and help advance their collective interests. Motivated by our own research on regional entrepreneurial development, we theorize institutions as lived and interpreted experiences. We present institutional change as a creative and experimental response to emergent or competing logics. This conception of institutions has implications for how we theorize about economic transformation, recognizing that processes of institutional change are set in motion by endogenous attempts by economic actors to make sense of and act upon contradictory aspects of their varied institutional lives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Institutions are perceived differently by ecosystem actors and are constantly co- created through the interaction of these actors”
From Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program (2022) · cites this paper as Lowe, N. J., & Feldman, M. P. (2017)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Institutions are perceived differently by ecosystem actors and are constantly co- created through the interaction of these actors”
From Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program (2022) · cites this paper as Lowe and Feldman (2017)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- Amin A., 1995, Managing cities: The new urban context, 91
- Auerswald P., 2015, The Oxford handbook of local competitiveness, 54
- 10.1177/0309132513507823 · DOI
- 10.1177/0170840699205004 · DOI
- 10.2139/ssrn.2580336 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11186-009-9095-3 · DOI
- Braczyk H. J., 1998, Regional innovation systems: The role of governances in a globalized world, 414
- Chang H. J., 2003, Globalization, economic development and the role of the state
- Chang H. J., 2005, Reimagining Growth, 99
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207183.003.0001 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-50007-7_10 · DOI
- Feldman M. P., 2015, Handbook of manufacturing industries in the world economy, 451
- 10.1162/INOV_a_00063 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.015 · DOI
- 10.1080/0034340052000320888 · DOI
- Friedland R., 1991, The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, 232
- 10.1093/jeg/3.1.75 · DOI
- 10.1111/gec3.12158 · DOI
- 10.1080/00213624.2007.11507019 · DOI
- Lester R. K., 2009, Innovation—The missing dimension
- 10.1068/a40111 · DOI
- Lowe N. J. andFeldman M. P.(2015)Breaking the waves: Innovating at the intersections of local economic development planning. AAG. Chicago Illinois April 2015. Conference Paper.
- 10.1080/00343400701875179 · DOI
- 10.7135/UPO9781843318903 · DOI
- 10.1177/0042098015586547 · DOI
- 10.1504/IJESB.2009.022805 · DOI
- Martin R., 2000, A companion to economic geography, 77
- Mason C., 2014, Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship
- 10.1177/000312240006500601 · DOI
- 10.1080/08985626.2016.1186749 · DOI · Paper page
- Mukherjee S., 2016, The gene: An intimate history
- Nelson R. R., 1995, Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change, Journal of Economic Literature, 33, 48
- 10.1017/CBO9780511808678 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00343404.2012.748978 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2006.tb00286.x · DOI
- Sabel C. F., 1996, Organisation for economic co‐operation and development, 23
- Sine W. D., 2010, Institutions and entrepreneurship, Research in the Sociology of Work, 21, 1, 10.1108/S0277-2833(2010)0000021005 · DOI
- Spigel B., 2015, The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems
- 10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484 · DOI · Paper page
- Stark D., 2011, The sense of dissonance: Accounts of worth in economic life, 10.2307/j.ctt7pg4h · DOI
- Storper M., 1997, The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy
- 10.1177/0170840606068343 · DOI
- Weick K. E., 1995, Sensemaking in organizations
- Zoller T., 2010, Unpublished PhD dissertation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program
Wurth, B., Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2022) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258721998948 · Cited by 789
“Actors within an ecosystem might have varying motivations, even to the point of conflicting agendas ( Feldman & Lowe, 2018) and might perceive institutions and, by extension, interventions, differently ( Lowe & Feldman, 2017).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Lowe, N. J., & Feldman, M. P.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lowe, Nichola J.
- Venue
- Geography Compass
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1749-8198 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2602849470
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 7.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- cdr.lib.unc.edu
- Locations
- Geography Compass (publishedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
- UNC Libraries
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Social Sciences › Development › Regional Development and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
- Keywords
- institutions, institutional change, entrepreneurship, economic transformation, endogenous change, competing logics, innovation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
