Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Partnering with teens with past suicide-related crises: development, application and refinement of safety procedures for co-design

Marraccini, Marisa E., Middleton, Telieha J., Delgaty, Lauren E., Iz, Ceren E.·2026·Health Expectations

Abstract

Background: Growing interest in participatory co‐design approaches for digital mental health interventions necessitates attention to the development of safety protocols for safely partnering with individuals with suicide‐related risk. Historically, adolescents with suicidal thoughts and behaviours (STB) have been excluded from such approaches, discounting the importance of youth voice. Methods: This case study provides an overview of the development and use of safety protocols for participatory co‐design with adolescents with histories of suicide‐related crises who identify as ethnic‐racial minoritised or lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning (LGBTQ+). We also explored teen co‐designer perspectives on the safety protocols employed, using applied thematic analysis to identify themes informing co‐design safety for adolescents with suicide‐related risk. Results: No safety issues emerged during co‐design sessions, with the majority of adolescent distress levels remaining the same before and after meetings. Adolescent co‐designers endorsed many components of the safety protocol, with recommendations for improvements mainly addressing the need to adapt the protocol based on the unique needs of each teen. Conclusion: Future work can draw from lessons learned in this case study to enact participatory co‐design approaches that acknowledge and leverage the strengths and resilience of young people with STB. Patient and Public Contribution: Adolescents with histories of suicide‐related crises who identify as ethnic‐racial minoritised or lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning (LGBTQ+) were involved as partners in this study, which followed principles of participatory co‐design to improve a virtual reality intervention to enhance suicide prevention for hospitalised youth.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/hex.70520

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Marraccini et al. (2026) found that adolescents themselves were thoughtful and capable participants in designing the safeguards that would govern their VR experiences.

    “finding that structured safety protocols could be implemented without compromising the young people's engagement or sense of agency, and that adolescents themselves were thoughtful and capable participants in designing the safeguards that would govern their VR experiences.”

    From Artificial intelligence and immersive technologies for LGBTQ+ youth: a narrative review (2026) · cites this paper as Marraccini et al. (2026)

  • Several reviewed studies showed that young people, including LGBTQ+ youth, can be meaningfully involved in designing the tools intended to serve them.

    “Several studies reviewed here, including those by Liem et al. (2026), Marraccini et al. (2026), and Solyst et al. (2023), showed that young people, LGBTQ+ youth among them, can be meaningfully involved in designing the tools intended to serve them.”

    From Artificial intelligence and immersive technologies for LGBTQ+ youth: a narrative review (2026) · cites this paper as Marraccini et al. (2026)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00481 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1111/hex.13299 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/jcpp.13258 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1111/hex.13650 · DOI
  5. 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076885 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/jcv2.12295 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/eip.13069 · DOI
  8. 10.2196/17520 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s10597-022-00937-7 · DOI
  10. 10.2196/13873 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1186/s12888-015-0429-6 · DOI
  12. 10.1176/appi.ps.55.8.901 · DOI
  13. 10.1027/0227-5910.30.1.13 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1186/s12888-023-04973-9 · DOI
  15. M.Webb C.Cooper H.Hemming et al.2023.Guidelines for Involving Young People With Lived and Living Experience of Suicide in Suicide Research. · DOI
  16. 10.2196/14191 · DOI
  17. 10.2196/45234 · DOI
  18. M.Marraccini L.Delgaty T.Middleton et al. “Practice Experiences for School Reintegration (PrESR): A Pilot Multiphase Optimization Trial of a Virtual Reality Intervention for Adolescents Hospitalized for Suicide‐Related Thoughts and Behaviors ”Evidence‐Based Practice in Child and Adolescent Mental Health ahead of print (2025). · DOI
  19. Guest G., 2011, Applied Thematic Analysis
  20. 10.1007/s10802-025-01299-w · DOI
  21. 10.1080/08039488.2019.1697747 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00170-6 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/hex.13597 · DOI
  24. 10.1186/s12961-019-0432-3 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.2196/31367 · DOI
  26. 10.1177/0095798417691381 · DOI
  27. 10.1037/ort0000425 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.jsp.2021.11.006 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Marraccini, M. E., Middleton, T. J., Delgaty, L. E., & Iz, C. E.
Affiliations
School of Education University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA
Venue
Health Expectations
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2026-02
Volume
29
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1369-6513
  • 1369-7625
Cited by
3
References
8
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review