The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Partnering with teens with past suicide-related crises: development, application and refinement of safety procedures for co-design
Abstract
Background: Growing interest in participatory co‐design approaches for digital mental health interventions necessitates attention to the development of safety protocols for safely partnering with individuals with suicide‐related risk. Historically, adolescents with suicidal thoughts and behaviours (STB) have been excluded from such approaches, discounting the importance of youth voice. Methods: This case study provides an overview of the development and use of safety protocols for participatory co‐design with adolescents with histories of suicide‐related crises who identify as ethnic‐racial minoritised or lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning (LGBTQ+). We also explored teen co‐designer perspectives on the safety protocols employed, using applied thematic analysis to identify themes informing co‐design safety for adolescents with suicide‐related risk. Results: No safety issues emerged during co‐design sessions, with the majority of adolescent distress levels remaining the same before and after meetings. Adolescent co‐designers endorsed many components of the safety protocol, with recommendations for improvements mainly addressing the need to adapt the protocol based on the unique needs of each teen. Conclusion: Future work can draw from lessons learned in this case study to enact participatory co‐design approaches that acknowledge and leverage the strengths and resilience of young people with STB. Patient and Public Contribution: Adolescents with histories of suicide‐related crises who identify as ethnic‐racial minoritised or lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning (LGBTQ+) were involved as partners in this study, which followed principles of participatory co‐design to improve a virtual reality intervention to enhance suicide prevention for hospitalised youth.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Marraccini et al. (2026) found that adolescents themselves were thoughtful and capable participants in designing the safeguards that would govern their VR experiences.
“finding that structured safety protocols could be implemented without compromising the young people's engagement or sense of agency, and that adolescents themselves were thoughtful and capable participants in designing the safeguards that would govern their VR experiences.”
From Artificial intelligence and immersive technologies for LGBTQ+ youth: a narrative review (2026) · cites this paper as Marraccini et al. (2026)
Several reviewed studies showed that young people, including LGBTQ+ youth, can be meaningfully involved in designing the tools intended to serve them.
“Several studies reviewed here, including those by Liem et al. (2026), Marraccini et al. (2026), and Solyst et al. (2023), showed that young people, LGBTQ+ youth among them, can be meaningfully involved in designing the tools intended to serve them.”
From Artificial intelligence and immersive technologies for LGBTQ+ youth: a narrative review (2026) · cites this paper as Marraccini et al. (2026)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lehtimaki, S., Martic, J., Wahl, B., Foster, K. T., & Schwalbe, N. (2021) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/25847 · Cited by 488
Mohr, D. C., Lyon, A. R., Lattie, E. G., Reddy, M., & Schueller, S. M. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.7725 · Cited by 432
Garrido, S., Millington, C., Cheers, D., Boydell, K., Schubert, E., Meade, T., & Nguyen, Q. V. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00759 · Cited by 400
Hetrick, S. E., Robinson, J., Burge, E., Blandon, R., Mobilio, B., Rice, S. M., Simmons, M. B., Alvarez-Jimenez, M., Goodrich, S., & Davey, C. G. (2018) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/mental.9041 · Cited by 151
Pediatric Mental Health Hospitalizations at Acute Care Hospitals in the US, 2009-2019
Arakelyan, M., Freyleue, S., Avula, D., McLaren, J. L., O’Malley, A. J., & Leyenaar, J. K. (2023) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2023.1992 · Cited by 127 · cited 1×
“Approximately 20% of adolescents report seriously considering a suicide attempt, and 9% report having attempted suicide (CDC, 2024), with the number of paediatric hospitalisations for suicidal behaviours increasing by 31% over the past 10 years [12].”
Subjective Units of Distress Scale
Wolpe, J. (2018) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t05183-000 · Cited by 82
Robinson, J., Bailey, E., Hetrick, S., Paix, S., O'Donnell, M., Cox, G., Ftanou, M., & Skehan, J. (2017) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/mental.7847 · Cited by 76
Porche, M. V., Folk, J. B., Tolou-Shams, M., & Fortuna, L. R. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.867460 · Cited by 45
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00481 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/hex.13299 · DOI
- 10.1111/jcpp.13258 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/hex.13650 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076885 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcv2.12295 · DOI
- 10.1111/eip.13069 · DOI
- 10.2196/17520 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10597-022-00937-7 · DOI
- 10.2196/13873 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s12888-015-0429-6 · DOI
- 10.1176/appi.ps.55.8.901 · DOI
- 10.1027/0227-5910.30.1.13 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s12888-023-04973-9 · DOI
- M.Webb C.Cooper H.Hemming et al.2023.Guidelines for Involving Young People With Lived and Living Experience of Suicide in Suicide Research. · DOI
- 10.2196/14191 · DOI
- 10.2196/45234 · DOI
- M.Marraccini L.Delgaty T.Middleton et al. “Practice Experiences for School Reintegration (PrESR): A Pilot Multiphase Optimization Trial of a Virtual Reality Intervention for Adolescents Hospitalized for Suicide‐Related Thoughts and Behaviors ”Evidence‐Based Practice in Child and Adolescent Mental Health ahead of print (2025). · DOI
- Guest G., 2011, Applied Thematic Analysis
- 10.1007/s10802-025-01299-w · DOI
- 10.1080/08039488.2019.1697747 · DOI
- 10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00170-6 · DOI
- 10.1111/hex.13597 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12961-019-0432-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2196/31367 · DOI
- 10.1177/0095798417691381 · DOI
- 10.1037/ort0000425 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jsp.2021.11.006 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial intelligence and immersive technologies for LGBTQ+ youth: a narrative review
Shekarchi, R., Eleuteri, S., Saladino, V., Calaresi, D., Giordano, F., & Prunas, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.2002054
Metadata
- Authors
- Marraccini, M. E., Middleton, T. J., Delgaty, L. E., & Iz, C. E.
- Affiliations
- School of Education University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA
- Venue
- Health Expectations
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2026-02
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1369-6513
- 1369-7625
- PMC
- PMC12885166
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 8
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review