Cited by 488Digital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Treatment and AccessImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Evidence on Digital Mental Health Interventions for Adolescents and Young People: Systematic Overview

Open access
Lehtimaki, Susanna, Martic, Jana, Wahl, Brian, Foster, Katherine T, Schwalbe, Nina·2021·JMIR Mental Health

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An estimated 1 in 5 adolescents experience a mental health disorder each year; yet because of barriers to accessing and seeking care, most remain undiagnosed and untreated. Furthermore, the early emergence of psychopathology contributes to a lifelong course of challenges across a broad set of functional domains, so addressing this early in the life course is essential. With increasing digital connectivity, including in low- and middle-income countries, digital health technologies are considered promising for addressing mental health among adolescents and young people. In recent years, a growing number of digital health interventions, including more than 2 million web-based mental health apps, have been developed to address a range of mental health issues. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to synthesize the current evidence on digital health interventions targeting adolescents and young people with mental health conditions, aged between 10-24 years, with a focus on effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and generalizability to low-resource settings (eg, low- and middle-income countries). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Cochrane databases between January 2010 and June 2020 for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on digital mental health interventions targeting adolescents and young people aged between 10-24 years. Two authors independently screened the studies, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the reviews. RESULTS: In this systematic overview, we included 18 systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We found evidence on the effectiveness of computerized cognitive behavioral therapy on anxiety and depression, whereas the effectiveness of other digital mental health interventions remains inconclusive. Interventions with an in-person element with a professional, peer, or parent were associated with greater effectiveness, adherence, and lower dropout than fully automatized or self-administered interventions. Despite the proposed utility of digital interventions for increasing accessibility of treatment across settings, no study has reported sample-specific metrics of social context (eg, socioeconomic background) or focused on low-resource settings. CONCLUSIONS: Although digital interventions for mental health can be effective for both supplementing and supplanting traditional mental health treatment, only a small proportion of existing digital platforms are evidence based. Furthermore, their cost-effectiveness and effectiveness, including in low- and middle-income countries, have been understudied. Widespread adoption and scale-up of digital mental health interventions, especially in settings with limited resources for health, will require more rigorous and consistent demonstrations of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness vis-à-vis the type of service provided, target population, and the current standard of care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/25847

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [30]Grist R Porter J Stallard P Mental Health Mobile Apps for Preadolescents and Adolescents: A Systematic Review J Med Internet Res 2017 5 25 19 5 e176 10.2196/jmir.7332 28546138 28546138 PMC5465380 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [45]WHO WHO Guideline: Recommendations on Digital Interventions for Health System Strengthening 2019 Geneva WHO 31162915
  3. [46]Giovanelli A Ozer EM Dahl RE Leveraging Technology to Improve Health in Adolescence: A Developmental Science Perspective J Adolesc Health 2020 8 67 2S S7 S13 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.02.020 32718517 32718517 PMC8765767 · DOI
  4. [52]Viswanathan M Kennedy S McKeeman J Christian R Treatment of Depression in Children and Adolescents. A Systematic Review. AHRQ Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. Report No.EHC005-EF 2020 Rockville, MD Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 32298061
  5. [53]Treatment of Anxiety Disorders. A Systematic Review. SBU Yellow Report No. 171/1+2 2005 Stockholm Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment 28876726

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lehtimaki, S., Martic, J., Wahl, B., Foster, K. T., & Schwalbe, N.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • United Nations University-International Institute for Global Health (MY)
Corresponding author
Schwalbe, Nina
Venue
JMIR Mental Health
Published
2021-04-29
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
e25847
ISSN
2368-7959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3134071992
Cited by
488
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 120 · 2025: 136 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 82 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 5
FWCI
9.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Fondation Botnar
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
digital mental health interventions, adolescents, youth, computerized cognitive behavioral therapy, anxiety, depression, low- and middle-income countries, cost-effectiveness, treatment accessibility, intervention adherence, dropout

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review