Cited by 26Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and Education

Evaluating the impact of self‐monitoring of blood glucose frequencies on glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes who do not use insulin: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Open access
Xu, Yingqi, Tan, David Hsien Yung, Lee, Joyce Yu‐Chia·2019·International Journal of Clinical Practice

Abstract

AIMS: International diabetes guidelines have not established the frequencies of self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who do not use insulin. The present study aimed to assess the impact of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) frequencies on the glucose control and other outcomes in non-insulin-treated patients with T2D. METHODS: A literature search was performed in four databases. Randomised controlled trials with ≥6-month follow-up duration that compared the impact of different frequencies of SMBG on glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) were included. Studies with abstract only or reported effects of SMBG as a secondary outcome were excluded. RESULTS: Of the 1557 studies identified, 12 RCTs with a total of 3350 patients were analysed. Overall, performing SMBG for 8 to 14 times per week was correlated with a better HbA1c control at 6 months (MD -0.46%, 95% CI -0.54 to -0.39) and 12 months (MD -0.20%, 95% CI -0.29 to -0.11). However, up to seven measurements of SMBG per week did not significantly affect glycaemic control. In addition, performing SMBG between 8 and 14 times per week was also associated with improved BMI (MD -0.46, 95% CI -0.84 to -0.08). When the results of SMBG were applied to adjust diabetes medication, a significant reduction in HbA1c levels was observed in the intervention arm compared to the control arm. CONCLUSIONS: Eight to 14 measurements of SMBG per week were associated with an improved glycaemic control and a reduced BMI in patients with T2D not using insulin.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ijcp.13357

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The reduction in glycated haemoglobin from blood glucose monitoring in non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes is particularly seen if monitoring is frequent (between 8 and 14 times per week).

    “and is frequent (between 8 and 14 times per week).7”

    From Blood glucose monitoring devices: current considerations (2023) · cites this paper as [7]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, Y., Tan, D. H. Y., & Lee, J. Y.
Affiliations
  • Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore
  • NHG Polyclinics (SG)
Venue
International Journal of Clinical Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-05-22
Volume
73
Issue
7
Pages
e13357-e13357
ISSN
  • 1368-5031 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-1241
OpenAlex
W2943231054
Cited by
26
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
self-monitoring of blood glucose, type 2 diabetes, non-insulin-treated patients, HbA1c, glycemic control, body mass index, medication adjustment, diabetes self-management
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Insulin, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review