Cited by 5Food composition and propertiesSeed and Plant BiochemistryCeliac Disease Research and Management

Development of a Yeast-free Bread Using Legume and Nut Flours in a Gluten-free Flour: Techno-functional Characteristics and Sensory Evaluation

Open access
Tuna, Ayca, Ortiz‐Solà, Jordi, López‐Mas, Laura, Baser, Filiz, Kallas, Zein, Aguiló‐Aguayo, Ingrid, Gulec, Sukru, Ozen, Banu +1 more·2024·International Journal of Food Science & Technology

Abstract

Summary This study aimed to investigate the effect of combined use of legume and nut flours on physical, nutritional and sensory properties of yeast‐free bread by substituting gluten‐free flour with hazelnut and white bean flours. Yeast‐free bread containing a mixture of 30% hazelnut and white bean flours was found to have the lowest hardness (9.04 N) and the largest specific volume (1.51 mL g−1) compared to the reference gluten‐free bread (18 N and 1.43 mL g−1) using a mixture design. Hazelnut and bean flours improved the in vitro starch digestion, reducing rapidly digestible starch by 29% and increasing resistant starch compared to the reference bread. Free choice profiling sensory analysis revealed that the developed breads containing nuts and legumes differed from the standard gluten‐free formulation and a commercial product available on the market. The combined use of bean and hazelnut flours was demonstrated as functional ingredients for enhancement of nutritional, sensory and textural aspects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ijfs.17153

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies combining rice flour with legume flours, such as chickpea flour, have demonstrated improved emulsifying properties and enhanced dough development.

    “Studies combining rice flour with legume flours, such as chickpea flour, have demonstrated improved emulsifying properties and enhanced dough development [44,106,112,113].”

    From Valorization of Microalgae as Multifunctional Protein Sources in Plant-Based Systems: Structural, Functional, and Processing Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Introduction (p. 1) reports that a rice–bean flour blend improved dough consistency, and the Flours section (p. 5) finds that white bean flour had the highest emulsifying activity among the flours tested. The paper does not test chickpea flour or show that combining rice and legume flours improved the blend’s emulsifying properties. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For composite flours that include bean flour, recent research has shown their use in products such as bread, biscuits, cakes, muffins, snacks, and noodles.

    “For composite flours that include bean flour, recent research has shown their use in products such as bread [42,44,103,104], biscuits [105], cakes [106], muffins [41,43], snacks [107], and noodles [108].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. P ´ arraga, A.R., Villegas, B. & T ´ arrega, M.A. (2022). Perfil de Libre Elecci ´ on y Perfil Flash. In: An ´ alisis sensorial de alimentos y respuesta del consumidor (edited by F.J.P. Elortondo & M.D. Salvador). Pp. 299 -312. Zaragoza, Spain: Acribia.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tuna, A., Ortiz‐Solà, J., López‐Mas, L., Baser, F., Kallas, Z., Aguiló‐Aguayo, I., Gulec, S., Ozen, B., & Tokatli, F.
Affiliations
  • Izmir Institute of Technology (TR)
  • IRTA, Postharvest Programme, Edifici Fruitcentre Parc Agrobiotech25003 Lleida Catalonia Spain
  • Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (ES)
  • Department of Food Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology Izmir Turkey
Venue
International Journal of Food Science & Technology
Published
2024-04-22
Volume
59
Issue
6
Pages
3999-4010
ISSN
  • 0950-5423 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2621
OpenAlex
W4395009606
Cited by
5
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Food Science & Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • IRTA (Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentaries) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • IYTE GCRIS Database (Izmir Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Public Risk Management Association (2023)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Seed and Plant Biochemistry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
Keywords
gluten-free bread, hazelnut flour, legume flour, nut flour, bread texture, specific volume, in vitro starch digestion, resistant starch, rapidly digestible starch, sensory evaluation, functional food ingredients

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review