Applying index of circulating anticoagulant to mixing tests with lupus anticoagulant screen and confirm reagents can distinguish with high specificity between lupus anticoagulants and direct factor Xa inhibitors
Abstract
Background Lupus anticoagulants (LA) are detected by prolongation of clotting times for dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) screening tests. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) can interfere with both screening and confirmatory tests. The present study aimed to investigate the influence of direct factor Xa inhibitors (DiXaIs) on screen, confirm and mixing tests and establish a method for differentiation from other sample types. Materials and methods A total of 257 samples including nonanticoagulated LA positive, LA positive with DiXaIs, factor deficiency, FVIII inhibitors, warfarin and non-APS DiXaIs were tested. APTT reagents Cephen LS/Cephen and dRVVT reagents LA1/LA2 were used, respectively, to screen/confirm the study group. Index of circulating anticoagulant (ICA) was calculated from clotting times based on the following formula as ICA screening and ICA confirmation. ICA= (1:1 Mix sample - Normal pooled plasma) / Screen patient x 100. An ICA matrix was established which suggested the presence of a DiXaI when both ICA screening and confirmation were above the cut-off. When only ICA screening is elevated, LA is suspected. Results Sensitivity and specificity of the ICA matrix were 52.2% and 92.8% for DiXaIs and 38.1% and 96.7% for LA in APTT, and 61.2% and 92.9% for DiXaIs and 22.2% and 88.4% for LA in dRVVT, respectively. Conclusion The ICA matrix achieved high specificity with a lower apparent sensitivity for DiXaI sam…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A recent study revealed that using ICA for interpreting the mixing tests of LA screening and confirming reagents greatly improved the capacity to distinguish between samples containing LA and direct FXa inhibitors with high specificity.
“A recent study revealed that using ICA for interpreting the mixing tests of LA screening and confirming reagents greatly improved the capacity to distinguish between samples containing LA and direct FXa inhibitors with high specificity [28].”
From Comparison of different algorithms for lupus anticoagulant detection: a single-center experience (2024) · cites this paper as [28]
Cites
Pathogenesis of antiphospholipid syndrome: understanding the antibodies
Meroni, P. L., Borghi, M. O., Raschi, E., & Tedesco, F. (2011) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2011.52 · Cited by 620 · see citing works
Devreese, K. M. J., de Groot, P. G., de Laat, B., Erkan, D., Favaloro, E. J., Mackie, I., Martinuzzo, M., Ortel, T. L., Pengo, V., Rand, J. H., et al. (2020) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/jth.15047 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
Tripodi, A., Cohen, H., & Devreese, K. M. J. (2020) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/jth.14846 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Moore, G. W., Culhane, A. P., Daw, C. R., Noronha, C. P., & Kumano, O. (2016) · Thrombosis Research · doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2016.01.019 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Kumano, O., & Moore, G. W. (2018) · Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1002/rth2.12069 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationKumano, O., & Moore, G. W. (2019) · Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1002/rth2.12245 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Comparison of different algorithms for lupus anticoagulant detection: a single-center experience
Apipongrat, D., Lamool, R., Arnutti, P., Ruangpratheep, C., & Chantkran, W. (2024) · Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102333 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kumano, O., Amiral, J., Dunois, C., Peyrafitte, M., & Moore, G. W.
- Affiliations
- Sysmex (Japan) (JP)
- Research Department Hyphen BioMed Neuville sur Oise France
- St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Kumano, Osamu
- Venue
- International Journal of Laboratory Hematology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-05-11
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 771-778
- ISSN
- 1751-5521 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-553X
- OpenAlex
- W3162755412
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Laboratory Hematology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Keywords
- lupus anticoagulant, direct factor Xa inhibitors, mixing test, dilute Russell's viper venom time, activated partial thromboplastin time, anticoagulant interference, differential diagnosis, antiphospholipid syndrome, factor deficiency, factor VIII inhibitors, warfarin
- MeSH terms
- Blood Coagulation, Blood Coagulation Tests, Humans, Partial Thromboplastin Time, Prothrombin Time, Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor, Factor Xa Inhibitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review