Cited by 11Nursing education and managementHealthcare Education and Workforce IssuesNursing Roles and Practices

Newly graduated nurses’ perceptions of work environment: a cross-sectional study in China.

Ma, Weiguang, Jiang, Yishan, Liang, Tao, Zhang, Huan, Ma, Fang·2021·International Journal of Nursing Practice

Abstract

AIM: To assess the attitudes of newly graduated nurses in China toward their work environment and identify the factors affecting their perception. BACKGROUND: Newly graduated nurses are the primary supply to cover the nursing shortage, but their stressful transition into clinical work has contributed to high turnover for decades. Although serving as a source of stress, the work environment can also be a source of support for new nurses. METHODS: A total of 2361 new nurses at 31 tertiary hospitals in 20 provinces were surveyed from June to November 2018, using the Chinese version of the Practice Environment Scale-Nursing Work Index. Basic information and their perception about work environment were collected. RESULTS: New nurses rated their work environment with an overall score of 84.67 (12.85). Multiple linear regression identified that education level, monthly income, hospital type and location, participation (or not) in standardized training programmes and having (or not) a mentor/preceptor were factors significantly associated with their perception of the work environment. CONCLUSION: The perception of newly graduated nurses in China was mainly positive overall. Nursing managers may take full advantage of factors affecting the perception of work environment to support newly graduated nurses better, to help their retention and transition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ijn.12929

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ma, W., Jiang, Y., Liang, T., Zhang, H., & Ma, F.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Ma, Weiguang
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-04-10
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
e12929-e12929
ISSN
  • 1322-7114 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-172X
OpenAlex
W3145343363
Cited by
11
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (71704189)
  • Peking Union Medical College (2017330010)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
Keywords
new nurses, work environment perception, nursing work environment, nurse turnover, nurse retention, mentoring, preceptorship, educational attainment, monthly income, hospital type
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Nurse Administrators, Nurses, Personnel Turnover, Surveys and Questionnaires, Workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review