Cited by 49Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Psychosocial Interventions for Food Addiction: A Systematic Review

Cassin, Stephanie E., Sijercic, Iris, Montemarano, Vanessa·2020·Current Addiction Reports

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40429-020-00295-y

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cassin, S. E., Sijercic, I., & Montemarano, V.
Affiliations
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Corresponding author
Cassin, Stephanie E.
Venue
Current Addiction Reports
Published
2020-01-17
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
9-19
ISSN
2196-2952 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3000352544
Cited by
48
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Addiction Reports (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
food addiction, psychosocial interventions, eating disorders, comorbidities, treatment efficacy, clinical guidelines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review