Cited by 407Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementCancer survivorship and care

Part II: Predictors of Depression after Stroke and Impact of Depression on Stroke Outcome: An Updated Systematic Review of Observational Studies

Kutlubaev, Mansur A., Hackett, Maree L.·2014·International Journal of Stroke

Abstract

Background We previously published a systematic review in 2005 on factors associated with the development of depression in people with stroke. Aim To update and expand that review to include published data on the impact of depression on stroke outcome. Methods We included all published observational studies (to May 31, 2013) with prospective consecutive recruitment of people with a clinical diagnosis of stroke where an attempt was made to assess the variables associated with, or predictive of, the development of depression. Results We included data from 23 studies including 18,374 people. Depression after stroke was associated with prestroke depression, more severe neurological deficit and physical disability in the acute phase, and later after stroke. No consistent relationship between depression and demographic parameters or stroke features was identified. The review of the impact of depression on stroke outcome included data from 14 cohorts, including 4498 people, and found that depression was negatively associated with functional outcome in stroke survivors. Conclusions Early identification of patients at high risk of depression after stroke, those with a history of depression and physical disability after stroke, would enable the early implementation of effective management and prevention strategies for depression. The reciprocal relationship between depression and physical disability highlights the need for interventions that reduce disability after stroke, which may in…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ijs.12356

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kutlubaev, M. A., & Hackett, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Republican Clinical Hospital named after G.G. Kuvatova (RU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Hackett, Maree L.
Venue
International Journal of Stroke
Published
2014-08-26
Volume
9
Issue
8
Pages
1026-1036
ISSN
  • 1747-4930 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-4949
OpenAlex
W1976232783
Cited by
407
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 13
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CLOK (University of Central Lancashire) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) (632925)
  • National Heart Foundation Future Leader Fellowship (100034)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
post-stroke depression, stroke, risk factors for depression, physical disability, neurological deficit, functional outcome, stroke survivors
MeSH terms
Depression, Humans, Predictive Value of Tests, Stroke, Observational Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review