Cited by 1,301Immunotherapy and Immune ResponsesImmune Response and InflammationT-cell and B-cell Immunology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 203 of the 203 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Human dendritic cell subsets: an update

Open access
Collin, Matthew, Bigley, Venetia·2018·Immunology

Abstract

Dendritic cells (DC) are a class of bone-marrow-derived cells arising from lympho-myeloid haematopoiesis that form an essential interface between the innate sensing of pathogens and the activation of adaptive immunity. This task requires a wide range of mechanisms and responses, which are divided between three major DC subsets: plasmacytoid DC (pDC), myeloid/conventional DC1 (cDC1) and myeloid/conventional DC2 (cDC2). Each DC subset develops under the control of a specific repertoire of transcription factors involving differential levels of IRF8 and IRF4 in collaboration with PU.1, ID2, E2-2, ZEB2, KLF4, IKZF1 and BATF3. DC haematopoiesis is conserved between mammalian species and is distinct from monocyte development. Although monocytes can differentiate into DC, especially during inflammation, most quiescent tissues contain significant resident populations of DC lineage cells. An extended range of surface markers facilitates the identification of specific DC subsets although it remains difficult to dissociate cDC2 from monocyte-derived DC in some settings. Recent studies based on an increasing level of resolution of phenotype and gene expression have identified pre-DC in human blood and heterogeneity among cDC2. These advances facilitate the integration of mouse and human immunology, support efforts to unravel human DC function in vivo and continue to present new translational opportunities to medicine.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/imm.12888

Cites

203 of 203 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Ontological overview and functional specialization of human dendritic cells (DC). (a) DC are often depicted as a single ‘all purpose’ cell in diagrams of T‐cell differentiation but each subset is specialized to make specific responses to pathogen or danger signals. Depending on the context, many different responses may be observed and selected principal functions of human plasmacytoid DC (pDC), conventional DC1 (cDC1) and cDC2 are depicted. (b) Ontological basis of DC, monocyte and macrophage classification. Haematopoietic stem cells (HSC) give rise to DC and monocyte‐derived cells by distinct routes marked by differences in the relative expression of interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF8) and IRF4 as shown in schematic bivariate plots beneath. Monocytes are IRF4/8 low but can be induced to differentiate into monocyte‐derived DC (mo‐DC). Monocyte‐derived macrophages are also ontologically distinct from many populations of long‐lived resident macrophages derived from early myeloid progenitors (EMP).
Figure 1 Ontological overview and functional specialization of human dendritic cells (DC). (a) DC are often depicted as a single ‘all purpose’ cell in diagrams of T‐cell differentiation but each subset is specialized to make specific responses to pathogen or danger signals. Depending on the context, many different responses may be observed and selected principal functions of human plasmacytoid DC (pDC), conventional DC1 (cDC1) and cDC2 are depicted. (b) Ontological basis of DC, monocyte and macrophage classification. Haematopoietic stem cells (HSC) give rise to DC and monocyte‐derived cells by distinct routes marked by differences in the relative expression of interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF8) and IRF4 as shown in schematic bivariate plots beneath. Monocytes are IRF4/8 low but can be induced to differentiate into monocyte‐derived DC (mo‐DC). Monocyte‐derived macrophages are also ontologically distinct from many populations of long‐lived resident macrophages derived from early myeloid progenitors (EMP).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Classical and revised models of human haematopoiesis. (a) In classical models of haematopoiesis, cell potential partitions by successive bifurcations descending from the apex where common lymphoid and common myeloid progenitors (CLP; CMP) arise from the haematopietic stem cell (HSC). Each progenitor population has homogeneous differentiation potential such that every cell has an equal probability of two mutually exclusive fates. Hence, dendritic cells (DC) were proposed to arise in the sequence: CMPs, granulocyte–macrophage DC progenitor (GMDP), macrophage DC progenitor (MDP), common DC progenitor (CDP) with a final pre‐DC stage leading to conventional DC1 (cDC1) and cDC2. Each population is given a uniform colour to indicate homogeneous potential. (b) Experimental data support several revisions to the classical model. First lineage is primed in early progenitors so that most populations contain only cells with a single potential. Second, lymphoid and myeloid potential run together originating as the lymphoid primed multi‐potent progenitor (LMPP) that separates from megakaryocyte and erythroid potential (MkE) at the apex. Hence the gates defined by CD38 (blue borders) and CD45RA (red borders) contain phenotypically related cells but with restricted potentials, indicated by bands of colour each corresponding to a discrete lineage.
Figure 2 Classical and revised models of human haematopoiesis. (a) In classical models of haematopoiesis, cell potential partitions by successive bifurcations descending from the apex where common lymphoid and common myeloid progenitors (CLP; CMP) arise from the haematopietic stem cell (HSC). Each progenitor population has homogeneous differentiation potential such that every cell has an equal probability of two mutually exclusive fates. Hence, dendritic cells (DC) were proposed to arise in the sequence: CMPs, granulocyte–macrophage DC progenitor (GMDP), macrophage DC progenitor (MDP), common DC progenitor (CDP) with a final pre‐DC stage leading to conventional DC1 (cDC1) and cDC2. Each population is given a uniform colour to indicate homogeneous potential. (b) Experimental data support several revisions to the classical model. First lineage is primed in early progenitors so that most populations contain only cells with a single potential. Second, lymphoid and myeloid potential run together originating as the lymphoid primed multi‐potent progenitor (LMPP) that separates from megakaryocyte and erythroid potential (MkE) at the apex. Hence the gates defined by CD38 (blue borders) and CD45RA (red borders) contain phenotypically related cells but with restricted potentials, indicated by bands of colour each corresponding to a discrete lineage.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Segregation of human dendritic cell (DC) potential in late precursor compartments. The CD34+ CD38+ CD45RA+ human granulocyte–macrophage DC progenitor (GMDP) contains only a minority of progenitor cells with bi‐ or tri‐potential indicated in yellow and red, respectively in the diagrams of cell potential of several hundred individual progenitors differentiated in vitro (schematic redrawn from data of Lee et al.32). A small minority of progenitors in the GMDP qualify as MDP [except without plasmacytoid DC (pDC) potential] or common DC progenitor (CDP; all three DC potentials). The CD123+ fraction of GMDP has been described as a CDP; although it does not contain monocyte potential, trilineage common DC progenitors are not found in this gate. In the blood, a CD34+ CD123− precursor fraction is found to contain conventional DC1 (cDC1) and cDC2 potential9 together with a CD34– CD123+ AXL+ SIGLEC6+ pre‐DC with mainly cDC2 potential.9, 10 Traces of cDC1 potential are also found in CD123+ cells. It is not known how the CD34+ CD123− blood precursor relates to GMDP, if it is a physiological route of cDC differentiation, or whether this occurs via AXL+ precursors. Broken lines indicate unconfirmed relationships.
Figure 3 Segregation of human dendritic cell (DC) potential in late precursor compartments. The CD34+ CD38+ CD45RA+ human granulocyte–macrophage DC progenitor (GMDP) contains only a minority of progenitor cells with bi‐ or tri‐potential indicated in yellow and red, respectively in the diagrams of cell potential of several hundred individual progenitors differentiated in vitro (schematic redrawn from data of Lee et al.32). A small minority of progenitors in the GMDP qualify as MDP [except without plasmacytoid DC (pDC) potential] or common DC progenitor (CDP; all three DC potentials). The CD123+ fraction of GMDP has been described as a CDP; although it does not contain monocyte potential, trilineage common DC progenitors are not found in this gate. In the blood, a CD34+ CD123− precursor fraction is found to contain conventional DC1 (cDC1) and cDC2 potential9 together with a CD34– CD123+ AXL+ SIGLEC6+ pre‐DC with mainly cDC2 potential.9, 10 Traces of cDC1 potential are also found in CD123+ cells. It is not known how the CD34+ CD123− blood precursor relates to GMDP, if it is a physiological route of cDC differentiation, or whether this occurs via AXL+ precursors. Broken lines indicate unconfirmed relationships.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Features of the principal human dendritic cell (DC) subsets. Diagrams of the main surface markers, pathogen sensors and responses of (a) plasmacytoid DC (pDC); (b) conventional DC1 (cDC1) and (c) cDC2. Data are principally drawn from observations on freshly isolated blood DC and do not capture the full range of responses possible following inflammatory activation.
Figure 4 Features of the principal human dendritic cell (DC) subsets. Diagrams of the main surface markers, pathogen sensors and responses of (a) plasmacytoid DC (pDC); (b) conventional DC1 (cDC1) and (c) cDC2. Data are principally drawn from observations on freshly isolated blood DC and do not capture the full range of responses possible following inflammatory activation.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 203 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 998

Metadata

Authors
Collin, M., & Bigley, V.
Affiliations
Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Collin, Matthew
Venue
Immunology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-02-27
Volume
154
Issue
1
Pages
3-20
ISSN
  • 0019-2805 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2567
OpenAlex
W2781617771
Cited by
1,301
References
203
Citations by year
2026: 69 · 2025: 169 · 2024: 167 · 2023: 191 · 2022: 237 · 2021: 198 · 2020: 155 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 27
FWCI
11.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Immunology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK (C30484/A21025)
  • Wellcome Trust (101155/Z/13/Z)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
dendritic cells, dendritic cell subsets, plasmacytoid dendritic cells, myeloid dendritic cells, DC1, DC2, transcription factors, IRF8, IRF4, PU.1, monocyte-derived dendritic cells, cell surface markers, innate immunity, adaptive immunity
MeSH terms
Kruppel-Like Factor 4, Cell Communication, Cell Differentiation, Dendritic Cells, Humans, Immunity, Phenotype, Signal Transduction, Biomarkers, Immunophenotyping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review