The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre clinical trial examining healing rates, safety and cost to closure of an acellular reticular allogenic human dermis versus standard of care in the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers
Abstract
Acellular dermal matrices can successfully heal wounds. This study's goal was to compare clinical outcomes of a novel, open‐structure human reticular acellular dermis matrix ( HR‐ADM ) to facilitate wound closure in non‐healing diabetic foot ulcers ( DFUs ) versus DFUs treated with standard of care ( SOC ). Following a 2‐week screening period in which DFUs were treated with offloading and moist wound care, patients were randomised to either SOC alone or HR‐ADM plus SOC applied weekly for up to 12 weeks. At 6 weeks, the primary outcome time, 65% of the HR‐ADM ‐treated DFUs healed (13/20) compared with 5% (1/20) of DFUs that received SOC alone. At 12 weeks, the proportions of DFUs healed were 80% and 20%, respectively. Mean time to heal within 12 weeks was 40 days for the HR‐ADM group compared with 77 days for the SOC group. There was no incidence of increased adverse or serious adverse events between groups or any adverse events related to the graft. Mean and median graft costs to closure per healed wound in the HR‐ADM group were $1475 and $963, respectively. Weekly application of HR‐ADM is an effective intervention for promoting closure of non‐healing DFUs .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Time to heal was reported in all studies, but only 4 studies [7,8,29,30]were eligible for metaanalysis.”
From Efficacy and safety of acellular dermal matrix in diabetic foot ulcer treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“Five studies [7,8,17,28,29] reported the number of complete wound healing in 12 weeks”
From Efficacy and safety of acellular dermal matrix in diabetic foot ulcer treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“Several published articles have evaluated in clinical trials and demonstrated its success in accelerating the healing rate [7,8,17].”
From Efficacy and safety of acellular dermal matrix in diabetic foot ulcer treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“However when removing one study conducted by Zelen [7] and recalculating the remaining study, heterogeneity changed from severe to moderate (before, I 2 ¼ 77%, P ¼ 0.005; after, I 2 ¼ 50%, P ¼ 0.14).”
From Efficacy and safety of acellular dermal matrix in diabetic foot ulcer treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as [7]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- 10.1001/jama.2015.10029 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.2015.10030 · DOI
- Margolis DJ, 2011, Incidence of diabetic foot ulcer and lower extremity amputation among medicare beneficiaries, 2006 to 2008: Data Points #2
- 10.2337/diacare.22.5.692 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2337/diacare.26.6.1696 · DOI
- 10.2337/diacare.26.6.1879 · DOI
- Snyder RJ, 2010, A post‐hoc analysis of reduction in diabetic foot ulcer size at 4 weeks as a predictor of healing by 12 weeks, Ostomy Wound Manage, 56, 44
- 10.2337/dc07-1300 · DOI
- 10.2337/dc12-1323 · DOI
- Harding K, 2010, An expert working group review. International consensus: acellular matrices for the treatment of wounds
- Irion G, 2010, Comprehensive wound management, 3
- Mast BA, 1992, Wound healing: biochemical and clinical aspects, 344
- Wilgus TA, 2007, Regenerative healing in fetal skin: a review of the literature, Ostomy Wound Manage, 53, 16
- 10.1097/01.prs.0000258829.07399.f0 · DOI
- 10.5402/2012/698034 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)91838-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0305-4179(00)00096-6 · DOI
- Woo KY, 2009, A cross‐sectional validation study of using NERDS and STONEES to assess bacterial burden, Ostomy Wound Manage, 55, 40
- Wendelken ME, 2011, Wounds measured from digital photographs using photodigital planimetry software: validation and rater reliability, Wounds, 23, 267
- 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1524-475X.1999.00201.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2337/diacare.24.2.290 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2337/diacare.26.6.1701 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2009.00585.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/iwj.12395 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/iwj.12566 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.addr.2003.08.003 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.201403039 · DOI
- 10.1111/iwj.12185 · DOI · Paper page
- Brigido SA, 2004, Effective management of major lower extremity wounds using an acellular regenerative tissue matrix: a pilot study, Orthopedics, 27, s145, 10.3928/0147-7447-20040102-14 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2006.00209.x · DOI
Cited by
Guo, X., Mu, D., & Gao, F. (2017) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.008 · Cited by 80
Cazzell, S., Vayser, D., Pham, H., Walters, J., Reyzelman, A., Samsell, B., Dorsch, K., & Moore, M. (2017) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/wrr.12551 · Cited by 78
Sui, L., Xie, Q., Jiang, H.-T., & Li, X.-D. (2024) · BMC Endocrine Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12902-024-01550-3 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Zelen, C. M., Orgill, D. P., Serena, T., Galiano, R., Carter, M. J., DiDomenico, L. A., Keller, J., Kaufman, J., & Li, W. W.
- Affiliations
- Department of Medical Education Professional Education and Research Institute Roanoke VA USA
- Department of Plastic Surgery Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston MA USA
- Serena Group Cambridge MA USA
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University Chicago IL USA
- Strategic Solutions Inc. Cody WY USA
- Lower Extremity Institute for Research and Therapy Youngstown OH USA
- Shenandoah Lower Extremity Research Troutville VA USA
- General Surgery Premier Surgical Brick NJ USA
- The Angiogenesis Foundation Cambridge MA USA
- Venue
- International Wound Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-04-12
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 307-315
- ISSN
- 1742-4801
- 1742-481X
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.