INDEPENDENT CONTRASTS SUCCEED WHERE ANCESTOR RECONSTRUCTION FAILS IN A KNOWN BACTERIOPHAGE PHYLOGENY
Abstract
Methods of ancestor reconstruction are important tools for evolutionary inference that are difficult to test empirically because ancestral states are rarely known with certainty. We evaluated reconstruction methods for continuous phenotypic characters using taxa from an experimentally generated bacteriophage phylogeny. Except for one slowly evolving character, the estimated ancestral states of continuous phenotypic characters were highly inaccurate and biased, even when including a known ancestor at the root. This error was caused by a directional trend in character evolution and by rapid rates of character evolution. Computer simulations confirmed that such factors affect reconstruction of continuous characters in general. We also used phenotypic viral characters to evaluate two methods that attempt to estimate the correlation between characters during evolution. Whereas a nonphylogenetic regression was relatively inaccurate and biased, independent contrasts accurately estimated the correlation between characters with little bias.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If the evolution of a trait was directionally biased, or characterized by heterogeneous evolutionary rates, reconstructions of past events may be unreliable using extant taxa alone.
“If the evolution of a trait was directionally biased, or characterized by heterogeneous evolutionary rates, reconstructions of past events may be unreliable using extant taxa alone (Oakley and Cunningham 2000).”
From THE EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF CETACEAN BRAIN AND BODY SIZE: CETACEAN BRAIN EVOLUTION (2013) · cites this paper as Oakley and Cunningham 2000
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793 · see citing works
CLADISTIC TESTS OF ADAPTATIONAL HYPOTHESES
Coddington, J. A. (1988) · Cladistics · doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.1988.tb00465.x · Cited by 438 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Slater, G. J., Harmon, L. J., & Alfaro, M. E. (2012) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01723.x · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Finarelli, J. A., & Flynn, J. J. (2006) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150500541698 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Evolution of Stress-Regulated Gene Expression in Duplicate Genes of Arabidopsis thaliana
Zou, C., Lehti-Shiu, M. D., Thomashow, M., & Shiu, S.-H. (2009) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000581 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
THE EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF CETACEAN BRAIN AND BODY SIZE: CETACEAN BRAIN EVOLUTION
Montgomery, S. H., Geisler, J. H., McGowen, M. R., Fox, C., Marino, L., & Gatesy, J. (2013) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.12197 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Montgomery, S. H., Capellini, I., Barton, R. A., & Mundy, N. I. (2010) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/1741-7007-8-9 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Comparative bioacoustics: a roadmap for quantifying and comparing animal sounds across diverse taxa
Odom, K. J., Araya‐Salas, M., Morano, J. L., Ligon, R. A., Leighton, G. M., Taff, C. C., Dalziell, A. H., Billings, A. C., Germain, R. R., Pardo, M., et al. (2021) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12695 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
- Authors
- Oakley, T. H., & Cunningham, C. W.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Oakley, Todd H.
- ORCID
- Oakley, Todd H.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 397-405
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W2178409599
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 2.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
- Keywords
- independent contrasts, ancestral state reconstruction, directional selection, trait correlation, simulation study
- MeSH terms
- Computer Simulation, Phenotype, Phylogeny, Bacteriophage T7
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review