CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 237Political Conflict and GovernanceCulture, Economy, and Development StudiesPolitical Theory and Democracy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Legacy of Western Overseas Colonialism on Democratic Survival

Bernhard, Michael, Reenock, Christopher, Nordstrom, Timothy·2004·International Studies Quarterly
DOI 10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.00298.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Using an original dataset that covers the period from 1951 to 1995, we consider the enduring effects of Western overseas colonialism on the democratic survival of postcolonial democracies. We treat colonialism as a holistic phenomenon and differentiate the relative effects of its legacies with regard to the level of economic development, social fragmentation, and the relationship between the state and civil society. We find that Western overseas colonialism, a factor often overlooked in recent large-n studies, continues to have an effect on the survival of democratic regimes. We further find that the legacy of specific colonial powers has an important effect on survival as well. Unlike previous studies, we find that former Spanish colonies outperform British colonies when colonialism is conceptualized holistically. However, when we break colonial legacy into separate components (development, social fragmentation, and the relationship between the state and civil society), we find that the advantages former British colonies enjoy are attributable to the legacy of the state/civil society relationship. Moreover, we show that at least in the case of former British colonies, time spent under colonial rule is positively associated with democratic survival.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.00298.x

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Bollen K. A., 1983, American Sociology Review, 48, 572
  2. Brown J. M., 1999, The Oxford History of the British Empire, 703
  3. Cell J. W., 1999, The Oxford History of the British Empire, vol. 4: The Twentieth Century, 232
  4. Chirot D., 1996, Modern Tyrants
  5. Dahl R., 1971, Polyarchy
  6. Easterly W., 2001, Global Development Network Database
  7. Kasifir N., 1983, In Local Government in the Third World
  8. Nohlen D., 1993, Enciclopedia Electoral Latinoamericana y del Caribe
  9. Tomlinson B. R., 1999, The Oxford History of the British Empire, 357
  10. Wiseman J. A., 1990, Democracy in Black Africa

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 237

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bernhard, M., Reenock, C., & Nordstrom, T.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
  • University of Mississippi (US)
ORCID
Venue
International Studies Quarterly
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2004-03
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
225-250
ISSN
  • 0020-8833 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2478
DOI
10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.00298.x
OpenAlex
W2008749442
Cited by
237
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 13
FWCI
10.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1 (tdm, 4201 d)
Locations
International Studies Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Development › Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
Keywords
colonial legacy, democratic survival, postcolonial democracy, Western colonialism, state-civil society relations, social fragmentation, economic development, British colonies, Spanish colonies, regime durability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review