Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 380

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Match Makers and Deal Breakers: Analyses of Assortative Mating in Newlywed Couples

Watson, David, Klohnen, Eva C., Casillas, Alex, Nus Simms, Ericka, Haig, Jeffrey, Berry, Diane S.·2004·Journal of Personality
DOI 10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00289.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract We conducted a comprehensive analysis of assortative mating (i.e., the similarity between wives and husbands on a given characteristic) in a newlywed sample. These newlyweds showed (a) strong similarity in age, religiousness, and political orientation; (b) moderate similarity in education and verbal intelligence; (c) modest similarity in values; and (d) little similarity in matrix reasoning, self‐ and spouse‐rated personality, emotional experience and expression, and attachment. Further analyses established that similarity was not simply due to background variables such as age and education and reflected initial assortment (i.e., similarity at the time of marriage) rather than convergence (i.e., increasing similarity with time). Finally, marital satisfaction primarily was a function of the rater's own traits and showed little relation to spousal similarity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00289.x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. Aiken L. S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions
  2. Bentler P. M., 1995, EQS for Macintosh user's guide
  3. 10.1111/1467-6494.00049 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00531.x · DOI
  5. 10.1126/science.7195071 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Boye‐Beaman J., 1991, Assortative mating, relationship development, and intimacy among offspring of alcoholics, Family Dynamics of Addiction Quarterly, 1, 20
  7. Brennan K. A., 1998, Attachment theory and close relationships, 47
  8. 10.1007/BF01076408 · DOI
  9. 10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.559 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Byrne B. M., 1994, Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows
  11. Caspi A., 1993, Marital assortment and phenotypic convergence, Social Biology, 40, 48
  12. Clark L. A., 1999, Handbook of personality, 399
  13. Costa P. T., 1992, Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO‐PI‐R) and NEO Five‐Factor Inventory (NEO‐FFI) professional manual
  14. 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1992.00369.x · DOI
  15. 10.1111/1467-6494.00079 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/BF01065887 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00889.x · DOI
  18. 10.1006/obhd.1994.1029 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00915.x · DOI
  20. 10.1007/BF01067537 · DOI
  21. 10.1006/jrpe.1997.2194 · DOI
  22. Gangestad S. W., 2001, Nebraska symposium on motivation: Evolutionary psychology and motivation, 37
  23. 10.1017/S0140525X0000337X · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00103-3 · DOI
  25. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.170 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/BF01065996 · DOI
  27. John O. P., 1999, Handbook of personality, 102
  28. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995.tb00078.x · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00909.x · DOI · Paper page
  30. Kline R. B., 1998, Principles and practice of structural equation modeling
  31. 10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.1067 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1177/0146167298243004 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1037/0882-7974.11.3.431 · DOI
  34. 10.2307/348022 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Lykken D. T., 1993, Is human mating adventitious or the result of lawful choice? A twin study of mate selection, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 56, 10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.56 · DOI
  36. 10.1007/BF01065906 · DOI
  37. 10.1053/comp.2001.24575 · DOI
  38. 10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.323 · DOI
  39. McCrae R. R., 1999, Handbook of personality, 139
  40. 10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.563 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/0191-8869(94)90044-2 · DOI
  42. 10.1007/BF01073114 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90005-A · DOI
  44. Nicholson I. R., 1992, A note on the generalizability of assortative mating coefficients for personality, Social Biology, 39, 151
  45. 10.1007/BF01260935 · DOI
  46. 10.1080/00224498709551359 · DOI
  47. 10.1007/BF01067319 · DOI
  48. Psychological Corporation, 1999, The Wechsler Abbreviated Test of Intelligence manual
  49. 10.1006/jrpe.1999.2280 · DOI
  50. 10.1023/A:1010250818089 · DOI
  51. 10.1037/0022-3514.81.3.421 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/0191-8869(90)90166-O · DOI
  53. Robins R. W., 2000, Two personalities, one relationship, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 251, 10.1037/0022-3514.79.2.251 · DOI
  54. 10.1037/0003-066X.44.5.775 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/0191-8869(91)90057-I · DOI
  56. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00211.x · DOI
  57. 10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.878 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/0191-8869(93)90205-H · DOI
  59. 10.1007/BF01065686 · DOI
  60. 10.1007/BF01065824 · DOI
  61. Watson D., 1993, Handbook of mental control, 506
  62. Watson D., 2000, Self‐other agreement in personality and affectivity, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 546, 10.1037/0022-3514.78.3.546 · DOI
  63. 10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.820 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Wechsler D., 1991, Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Third Edition

Cited by

See all 380

Metadata

Authors
Watson, D., Klohnen, E. C., Casillas, A., Nus Simms, E., Haig, J., & Berry, D. S.
Venue
Journal of Personality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-08-31
Volume
72
Issue
5
Pages
1029-1068
ISSN
  • 0022-3506
  • 1467-6494
DOI
10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00289.x
Cited by
380
References
8
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.