The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structure in plant–animal interaction assemblages
Open accessAbstract
We present a comprehensive approach to detect pattern in assemblages of plant and animal species linked by interactions such as pollination, frugivory or herbivory. Simple structural models produce gradient, compartmented or nested patterns of interaction; intermediate patterns between a gradient and compartments are possible, and nesting within compartments produces a combined model. Interaction patterns can be visualized and analyzed either as matrices, as bipartite networks or as multivariate sets through correspondence analysis. We argue that differences among patterns represent outcomes of distinct evolutionary and ecological processes in these highly diversified assemblages. Instead of choosing one model a priori, assemblages should be probed for a suite of patterns. A plant–pollinator assemblage exemplifies a simple nested pattern, whereas a plant–herbivore assemblage illustrates a compound pattern with nested structures within compartments. Compartmentation should reflect coevolutionary histories and constraints, whereas differences in species abundance or dispersal may generate nestedness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
The statistics and biology of the species-area relationship
Connor, E. F., & McCoy, E. D. (1979) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283438 · Cited by 2,313
Cited by
The modularity of pollination networks
Olesen, J. M., Bascompte, J., Dupont, Y. L., & Jordano, P. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0706375104 · Cited by 2,639
Self-citationIndices, Graphs and Null Models: Analyzing Bipartite Ecological Networks
Dormann, C. F., Frund, J., Bluthgen, N., & Gruber, B. (2009) · The Open Ecology Journal · doi:10.2174/1874213000902010007 · Cited by 1,772
Almeida‐Neto, M., Guimarães, P., Guimarães, P. R., Loyola, R. D., & Ulrich, W. (2008) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16644.x · Cited by 1,757
Seven Shortfalls that Beset Large-Scale Knowledge of Biodiversity
Hortal, J., de Bello, F., Diniz-Filho, J. A. F., Lewinsohn, T. M., Lobo, J. M., & Ladle, R. J. (2015) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054400 · Cited by 1,743
Self-citationReview: Ecological networks – beyond food webs
Ings, T. C., Montoya, J. M., Bascompte, J., Blüthgen, N., Brown, L., Dormann, C. F., Edwards, F., Figueroa, D., Jacob, U., Jones, J. I., et al. (2009) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01460.x · Cited by 934
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewinsohn, T. M., Inácio Prado, P., Jordano, P., Bascompte, J., & M. Olesen, J.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-02-17
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 174-184
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0706
- OpenAlex
- W2116643531
- Cited by
- 509
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structure in plant–animal interaction assemblages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.14583.x
- The paper
- Lewinsohn, T. M., Inácio Prado, P., Jordano, P., Bascompte, J., & M. Olesen, J. (2006). Structure in plant–animal interaction assemblages. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.14583.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.