Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 451

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cross‐presentation: underlying mechanisms and role in immune surveillance

Rock, Kenneth L., Shen, Lianjun·2005·Immunological Reviews

Abstract

Summary: It was originally thought that a cell's major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules presented peptides derived exclusively from proteins synthesized by the cell itself. However, in some circumstances, antigens from the extracellular environment can be presented on MHC class I molecules and stimulate CD8+ T‐cell immunity, a process termed cross‐presentation. Cross‐presentation was originally discovered as an obscure phenomenon in transplantation immunity. However, it is now clear that it is a major mechanism by which the immune system monitors tissues and phagocytes for the presence of foreign antigen. Cross‐presentation is the only pathway by which the immune system can detect and respond to viral infections or mutations that exclusively occur in parenchymal cells rather than in bone marrow‐derived antigen‐presenting cells (APCs). Professional APCs, such as dendritic cells, are the principal cells endowed with the capacity to cross‐present antigens. In this process, the APCs acquire proteins from other tissue cells through endocytic mechanisms, especially phagocytosis or macropinocytosis. The internalized antigen can then be processed through at least two different mechanisms. In one pathway, the antigen is transferred from the phagosome into the cytosol, where it is hydrolyzed by proteasomes into oligopeptides that are then transported by the transporter associated with antigen processing to MHC class I molecules in the endoplasmic reticulum or phagosomes. In a second pathway, the antigen is cleaved into peptides by endosomal proteases, particularly cathepsin S, and bound by class I molecules probably in the endocytic compartment itself. Depending on the nature of the antigen, one or both of these pathways can contribute to cross‐presentation in vivo. The outcome of cross‐presentation can be either tolerance or immunity. Which of these outcomes occurs is thought to depend on whether antigens are acquired by themselves alone, leading to tolerance, or with immunostimulatory signals, leading to immunity. One source of such signals is from dying cells that release immunostimulatory ‘danger’ signals that promote the generation of immunity to their cellular antigens. In addition to the critical role of cross‐presentation in normal immune physiology, this pathway has considerable potential for being exploited for developing subunit vaccines that elicit both CD4+ and CD8+ T‐cell immunity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00301.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 451

Metadata

Authors
Rock, K. L., & Shen, L.
Venue
Immunological Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-09-23
Volume
207
Issue
1
Pages
166-183
ISSN
  • 0105-2896 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-065X
OpenAlex
W2134250807
Cited by
451
References
5
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross‐presentation: underlying mechanisms and role in immune surveillance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00301.x
The paper
Rock, K. L., & Shen, L. (2005). Cross‐presentation: underlying mechanisms and role in immune surveillance. Immunological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00301.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.