Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 52

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Framing as a cultural resource in health social movements: funding activism and the breast cancer movement in the US 1990–1993

Kolker, Emily S.·2004·Sociology of Health & Illness
DOI 10.1111/j.0141-9889.2004.00420.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Disease‐specific funding activism in the US has required health social movements (HSMs) to draw on both structural and cultural resources in order to persuade audiences and to redefine dominant conceptions of disease. Using a social constructionist analysis of Congressional testimony and media accounts of breast cancer funding activism between 1990–1993, this paper demonstrates that the use of culturally resonant frames served as an important cultural resource for breast cancer activists in the early 1990s. The breast cancer movement's use of three interconnected and culturally resonant frames aided the movement in redefining breast cancer as a problem of individual women to a major public health problem in need of governmental attention. This research contributes to both social movement and HSM scholarship by demonstrating that cultural resources, in the form of movement frames, are as central to social movement analysis as structural resources.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0141-9889.2004.00420.x

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Benford R.D., 1995, Social Movements: Critiques, Concepts
  2. 10.2307/800710 · DOI
  3. Davidman L., 2001, Motherloss
  4. Johnston H., 1995, Social Movements and Culture
  5. Klawiter M.(1999a)Reshaping the Contours of Breast Cancer: from Private Stigma to Public Actions.Ph.D. dissertation Department of Sociology University of California Berkeley.
  6. Love S.M., 1997, Feminist Frontiers IV
  7. McAdam D., 1994, New Social Movements: from Ideology to Identity
  8. 10.2307/3096934 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Swidler A., 1995, Social Movements and Culture
  10. Tarrow S., 1992, Frontiers in Social Movement Theory
  11. Taylor V., 1995, Social Movements and Culture
  12. 10.2307/3097008 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Williams R.H., 2000, Two faces of collective action frames: a theoretical consideration, Current Perspectives in Social Theory, 20, 127
  14. Williams G.I., 1995, Images of Issues: Typifying Contemporary Social Problems

Cited by

See all 52

Metadata

Authors
Kolker, E. S.
Venue
Sociology of Health & Illness
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-09
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
820-844
ISSN
  • 0141-9889
  • 1467-9566
DOI
10.1111/j.0141-9889.2004.00420.x
Cited by
52
References
56
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 19 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.