Cited by 134Digital Communication and LanguageWorkplace Violence and BullyingConflict Management and Negotiation

Email flaming behaviors and organizational conflict

Turnage, Anna K.·2007·Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Abstract

This study explores whether the attributes listed in the literature on flaming in email are considered characteristic of flaming by actual email users. Through the creation of a semantic differential scale-called the Message Invectives Scale-the study took eight concepts found in more than 20 research articles on flaming and examined email users' responses to a set of 20 messages in relation to those eight characteristics. Findings indicate that in each of the 20 cases, six of the original eight concepts relate to each other to form a common set, which also correlates positively with perceptions of flaming. Some of the messages that scored high for flaming contained profanity, all capital letters, excessive exclamation points or question marks, indicating that these attributes also relate to flaming. Based on these findings, recommendations are advanced as to how email should be used to avoid negative attributes that can lead to organizational conflict.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00385.x

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Turnage, A. K.
Affiliations
North Carolina State University (US)
Corresponding author
Turnage, Anna K.
Venue
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
Published
2007-10
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
43-59
ISSN
1083-6101 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058673351
Cited by
134
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
8.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Digital Communication and Language
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Conflict Management and Negotiation
Keywords
organizational conflict, swearing, exclamation points, question marks, email etiquette, computer-mediated communication, semantic differential

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review