The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users
Open accessAbstract
A review of research suggests that the desire for opinion reinforcement may play a more important role in shaping individuals’ exposure to online political information than an aversion to opinion challenge. The article tests this idea using data collected via a web-administered behavior-tracking study with subjects recruited from the readership of 2 partisan online news sites (N = 727). The results demonstrate that opinion-reinforcing information promotes news story exposure while opinion-challenging information makes exposure only marginally less likely. The influence of both factors is modest, but opinion-reinforcing information is a more important predictor. Having decided to view a news story, evidence of an aversion to opinion challenges disappears: There is no evidence that individuals abandon news stories that contain information with which they disagree. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“Homophily in communication, the tendency of people to communicate with others having similar beliefs, is understood to lead to the formation of echo chambers which reinforce individual beliefs and fuel further increase in polarization.”
From Credibility of climate change denial in social media (2019) · cites this paper as Garrett, 2009
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“For example, homophily among liberals and conservatives in political blogs links (Adamic and Glance, 2005), i.e., the tendency of liberal and conservative blogs to link primarily within their separate communities, leads to echo chambers (Jasny et al., 2015;Garrett, 2009;Flaxman et al., 2016), and hence beliefs can be polarized due to such exposure to selective information (Bakshy et al., 2015).”
From Credibility of climate change denial in social media (2019) · cites this paper as Garrett, 2009
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, users show a tendency to favor information adhering to their beliefs and join groups formed around a shared narrative, that is, echo chambers (1, 14–18).”
From The echo chamber effect on social media (2021) · cites this paper as [15]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Estudios basados en encuestas encuentran que el efecto polarizador de la red no deriva de la tendencia de las cámaras de eco, sino más bien de la exposición transversal a los mensajes de personas con ideologías políticas opuestas (Bail y otros, 2018;Garrett, 2009).”
From Polarización, heterogeneidad política y redes sociales en México: un análisis comparativo de #PresidenteRompaElPacto, #FRENA y #RevocacionDeMandato en Twitter (2023) · cites this paper as Garrett, 2009
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“In social media, such polarized communication networks were observed in controversial debates ranging from political orientation [10, 11], US and French presidential elections [12], or street protests [13].”
From Modeling echo chambers and polarization dynamics in social networks (2020) · cites this paper as [13]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods.
Longford, N. T., Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2075823 · Cited by 18,773
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods
Davidian, M. (2003) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2003.s288 · Cited by 13,820
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098 · Cited by 4,583
Christoph, V. F., Lazarfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1945) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3707538 · Cited by 1,732
Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy
Mutz, D. C. (2006) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511617201 · Cited by 1,687
Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy
Mutz, D. C. (2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2388 · Cited by 1,588
Media Use and Political Predispositions: Revisiting the Concept of Selective Exposure
Stroud, N. J. (2008) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-007-9050-9 · Cited by 1,154
Recent Research on Selective Exposure to Information
Frey, D. (1986) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60212-9 · Cited by 820
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Kohut, 2006, Online papers modestly boost newspaper readership: Maturing Internet news audience-broader than deep
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 998
No, It Is Not All About Selective Exposure: Information Selection Strategies in Referendums
Zumofen, G., Stadelmann‐Steffen, I., & Bühlmann, M. (2023) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-023-09893-8 · Cited by 7
Guo, J., Chen, H., & Lu, S. (2024) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2024.2341031 · Cited by 9
Bridging the Infodemic Equity Gap: North-South Digital Health Disparities and a Framework for Action
Osborne, A. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/80013 · Cited by 8
Hong, X., Pan, L., Xu, M., & Chen, Q. (2025) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-08-2024-0984 · Cited by 8
Multiple bursts of highly retweeted articles on social media
Cao, R., Wang, X., Xu, X.-K., & Zhou, J. (2021) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-021-03970-7 · Cited by 8
Uibu, M., & Koppel, K. (2021) · European Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.47368/ejhc.2021.305 · Cited by 7
Vargas, V. C., Vieira, V. A., Moura, L. R. C., & Filho, C. G. (2023) · The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/10696679.2023.2273560 · Cited by 8
The Digital Adaptation of International Bureaucracies
Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192859198.013.19 · Cited by 7
Bogado, N., Coninck, D. D., Duque, M., & Schwartz, S. J. (2024) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2024.2312614 · Cited by 8
Hate-sharing: A case study of its prevalence and impact on Gab
Weigel, M., & Gitomer, A. (2024) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448241245349 · Cited by 9
Politicized and Paranoid? Assessing Attitudinal Predictors of Alternative News Consumption
Puschmann, C., Stier, S., Zerrer, P., & Rauxloh, H. (2024) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2024.2383411 · Cited by 6
A Social Network Model for Analysis of Public Opinion Formation Process
Rabiee, H., Ladani, B. T., & Sahafizadeh, E. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2024.3435908 · Cited by 7
Origin and Evolution of the News Finds Me Perception: Review of Theory and Effects
de Zúñiga, H. G., & Cheng, Z. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-70231-0_10 · Cited by 10
Navigating precarious visibility: Ugandan sexual minorities on Twitter
Strand, C. (2019) · Journal of African Media Studies · doi:10.1386/jams.11.2.229_1 · Cited by 7
Disengagement in the Digital Age: A Virtue Ethical Approach to Epistemic Sorting on Social Media
Worden, K. J. (2019) · Moral Philosophy and Politics · doi:10.1515/mopp-2018-0066 · Cited by 7
Pendulating or resonating? A case of echo-chambers in twitter
Gupta, V., Dass, P., & Arora, R. (2022) · Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography · doi:10.1080/09720529.2021.2019442 · Cited by 7
Fake News Incidents through the Lens of the DCAM Disinformation Blueprint
Rapti, M., Tsakalidis, G., Petridou, S. G., & Vergidis, K. (2022) · Information · doi:10.3390/info13070306 · Cited by 10
Martin, J. D., & Sharma, K. (2023) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edad002 · Cited by 7
Combating Disinformation or Reinforcing Cognitive Bias: Effect of Weibo Poster’s Location Disclosure
Chang, L., Liu, J., Yang, T., & Xu, J. (2023) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v11i2.6506 · Cited by 7
Wazzan, A., & Aldamen, Y. (2023) · Journalism and Media · doi:10.3390/journalmedia4040064 · Cited by 14
Social Media, Participation, and Attitudes
Holmes, J. W., & McNeal, R. S. (2016) · Advances in public policy and administration (APPA) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9879-6.ch001 · Cited by 7
Partisan audience polarization: Beyond selective exposure
Ksiazek, T. B. (2016) · Atlantic Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/15456870.2016.1208658 · Cited by 7
Facebook as a ‘trusted space of everyday communication’: Parties, citizens and direct representation
Larsson, A. O. (2020) · Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies · doi:10.1386/ajms_00019_1 · Cited by 7
Grecu, S.-P., Vrânceanu, E. S., & Chiriac, H. C. (2025) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci14040226 · Cited by 7
Chang, K. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17073229 · Cited by 6
News avoidance or curation? Explicating the psychological process in news consumption on Facebook
Wu-Ouyang, B., Lu, S., & Chen, H. (2025) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448251351280 · Cited by 6
The influence of coordinated behavior on toxicity
Loru, E., Cinelli, M., Tesconi, M., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2024) · Online Social Networks and Media · doi:10.1016/j.osnem.2024.100289 · Cited by 10
Social Media, Democracy, and the Popular Public Sphere
Sander, A. (2025) · Constellations · doi:10.1111/1467-8675.12773 · Cited by 6
The Democratic Contribution of Weakly Tied Political Networks
Meraz, S. (2012) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439312451879 · Cited by 7
Factors in Recommending Contrarian Content on Social Media
Garimella, K., Morales, G. D. F., Gionis, A., & Mathioudakis, M. (2017) · ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci) · doi:10.1145/3091478.3091515 · Cited by 6
Lee, F. L. F., & Yin, Z. (2019) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1077699019858988 · Cited by 6
Transparency and Leverage Points for Sustainable Resource Management
Gísladóttir, J., Sigurgeirsdóttir, S., Stjernquist, I., & Ragnarsdottir, K. V. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142416801 · Cited by 6
A structural approach to detecting opinion leaders in Twitter by random matrix theory
Mohammadi, S., Moradi, P., Trufanov, A. I., & Jafari, G. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-48682-5 · Cited by 6
Navigational Structures and Information Selection Goals: A Closer Look at Online Selectivity
Edgerly, S., Vraga, E. K., McLaughlin, B., Alvarez, G., Yang, J., & Kim, Y. M. (2014) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2014.966360 · Cited by 6
Li, X., & Liu, X. (2013) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2013.11679154 · Cited by 6
Der Wert der Musik: Aushandlungsdynamiken in der digitalisierten Musikwirtschaft
Kropf, J. (2017) · kommunikation gesellschaft · doi:10.15460/kommges.2017.18.1.590 · Cited by 6
Recommender Systems in der populären Musik
Kropf, J. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-21165-3_6 · Cited by 7
Developing computational supports for frame reflection
Baumer, E. P. S., Polletta, F., Pierski, N., Celaya, C., & Rosenblatt, K. (2013) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · doi:10.9776/13126 · Cited by 6
Hwang, T. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.012 · Cited by 12
THE (VIRTUE) EPISTEMOLOGY OF POLITICAL IGNORANCE
Boult, C. (2021) · American Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.2307/48616057 · Cited by 7
Crowd control: Reducing individual estimation bias by sharing biased social information
Jayles, B., Sire, C., & Kurvers, R. H. J. M. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009590 · Cited by 10
Jordá, B., Cañedo, A., Bene, M., & Goyanes, M. (2021) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci10120460 · Cited by 7
Lin, C.-W. (2017) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-017-0576-6 · Cited by 6
Dealing with Dissonance: Responding to an Incongruent Test Result in a New Media Environment
Vraga, E. K. (2011) · Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0479 · Cited by 7
Unilateral Polarization in Public Health: Longitudinal Evidence from COVID-19Preprint
Fridman, A., Gershon, R., & Gneezy, A. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3644775 · Cited by 6
Infodemics on Youtube: Reliability of Content and Echo Chambers on COVID-19 (Preprint)Preprint
Marco, N. D., Cinelli, M., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2021) · doi:10.2196/preprints.32258 · Cited by 6
Journalist Identity and Selective Exposure: The Effects of Racial and Ethnic Diversity in News Staff
Duyn, E. V., Jennings, J. T., & Stroud, N. J. (2024) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2024.2330395 · Cited by 5
Pratt, M. G., Hedden, L. N., & Khan, H. (2025) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2022.0212 · Cited by 5
Rodríguez, L. T., & Arroyo, A. Z. (2022) · Observatorio (OBS*) · doi:10.15847/obsobs16320222076 · Cited by 6
Wagner, J. K. (2023) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2022.1022782 · Cited by 5
Retweeting Twitter Hate Speech After Musk Acquisition
Auten, T., & Matta, J. (2024) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-53503-1_22 · Cited by 5
Grosen, M. S., Sivertsen, M. F., & Hartley, J. M. (2024) · Poetics · doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2024.101942 · Cited by 5
Post-hoc Evaluation of Nodes Influence in Information Cascades: The Case of Coordinated Accounts
Marco, N. D., Brunetti, S., Cinelli, M., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2024) · ACM Transactions on the Web · doi:10.1145/3700644 · Cited by 8
Partisan temporal selective news avoidance: Evidence from online trace data
Heseltine, M., Barnehl, H.-M., & Wojcieszak, M. (2025) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12944 · Cited by 7
Fractal property: A tool for understanding the generation mechanism of echo chambers
Sun, Y., Gao, Y., Tobias‐Webb, J., Wang, R., & Liu, F. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127036 · Cited by 5
Breaking the bubble: A case study on the echo chamber effect in Instagram
Dutta, S., Arivazhagan, R., & Pradeep, E. (2025) · Journal of Information Technology Teaching Cases · doi:10.1177/20438869251326279 · Cited by 5
Scherr, S., Arendt, F., Prieler, M., & Ju, Y. (2021) · The Social Science Journal · doi:10.1080/03623319.2020.1859817 · Cited by 5
Politische Kommunikationsforschung im Wandel
Zerback, T., Marschall, S., Königslöw, K. K., & Borucki, I. R. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-26242-6_56-1 · Cited by 5
Bodrunova, S. S., & Nepiyuschikh, D. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-05061-9_33 · Cited by 5
Pull–push: a measure of over- or underpersonalization in recommendation
Gebremeskel, G. G., & de Vries, A. P. (2022) · International Journal of Data Science and Analytics · doi:10.1007/s41060-022-00354-9 · Cited by 5
Segmenting Voters by Motivation to Use Social Media and Their Lifestyle for Political Engagement
Mochla, V., Tsourvakas, G., & Stoubos, I. (2023) · Journal of Political Marketing · doi:10.1080/15377857.2023.2168831 · Cited by 9
Protesting With Feeling in Puerto Rico: Twitter and El Verano Del 19
Gainous, J., Vélez-Serrano, M., & Wagner, K. M. (2023) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129231161286 · Cited by 5
Macková, A., Novotná, M., Čejková, L., & Hrbková, L. (2023) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2023.2202650 · Cited by 7
Social media use and polarized redistributive attitudes: a comparative and causal perspective
Jung, H., & Lee, S. (2023) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2023.2214597 · Cited by 5
Dilkes, J. (2023) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/09579265231190344 · Cited by 5
Ünlü, A., Truong, S., & Kotonen, T. (2024) · International Journal of Data Science and Analytics · doi:10.1007/s41060-024-00571-4 · Cited by 5
Can Deepfakes Benefit the Metaverse in an Era of Disinformation? Insights from a Systematic Review
Stanciu, A., & Ciupercă, E. M. (2024) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.07.125 · Cited by 5
McLaughlin, B., Gotlieb, M. R., Mills, D. J., Serra, M. J., & Cloudy, J. (2024) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/00936502241277149 · Cited by 5
Exploring cognitive inertia in opinion dynamics using an activity-driven model
Pranesh, S., & Gupta, S. (2024) · Chaos Solitons & Fractals · doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115879 · Cited by 5
Emergence of echo chambers in social media communication involving multiple topics
Nagura, T., & Akiyama, E. (2025) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2025.2456561 · Cited by 6
Yoo, W., & Shin, D. (2016) · Info · doi:10.1108/info-03-2016-0013 · Cited by 5
Setting a Non-Agenda: Effects of a Perceived Lack of Problems in Recent News or Twitter
Pingree, R. J., Stoycheff, E., Sui, M., & Peifer, J. T. (2018) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2018.1451543 · Cited by 5
Wang, H., & Cai, T. (2018) · Cogent Social Sciences · doi:10.1080/23311886.2018.1482995 · Cited by 5
Strategic Transmission of Correlated Information
Currarini, S., Ursino, G., & Chand, A. K. S. (2020) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1093/ej/ueaa039 · Cited by 5
Hyun, K. D., Jung, N., & Seo, M. (2020) · Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies · doi:10.20879/kjjcs.2020.64.4.007 · Cited by 5
Howell, E. L. (2020) · Harvard Data Science Review · doi:10.1162/99608f92.f2823096 · Cited by 5
Modelling shifts in social opinion through an application of classical physics
Zachary, D. S. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-09165-1 · Cited by 5
Dey, S., Duff, B. R. L., & Karahalios, K. G. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3502084 · Cited by 5
What Happened to the Public Sphere? The Networked Public Sphere and Public Opinion Formation
Kaiser, J., Fähnrich, B., Rhomberg, M., & Filzmaier, P. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09069-6_31 · Cited by 8
The role of affective and cognitive attitude extremity in perceived viewpoint diversity exposure
Zerback, T., & Kobilke, L. (2022) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448221117484 · Cited by 6
Ruiu, M. L., Ruiu, G., & Ragnedda, M. (2022) · International Sociology · doi:10.1177/02685809221138356 · Cited by 5
Echo Chambers within the Russo-Ukrainian War: The Role of Bipartisan Users
Zhang, P., Haq, E.-U., Zhu, Y., Hui, P., & Gareth Tyson, A. (2023) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1145/3625007.3627475 · Cited by 5
Strukturwandel von Öffentlichkeit
Hasebrink, U. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-27711-6_19 · Cited by 5
Legal socialization and selective exposure to “cop-watching” websites
Moule, R. K., Parry, M. M., & Fox, B. (2019) · Policing An International Journal · doi:10.1108/pijpsm-02-2019-0027 · Cited by 5
Communication and public engagement
Plohl, N., Ruggeri, K., Stuhlreyer, J. P., & Matz, S. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781351052542-10 · Cited by 5
Quantifying Political Behavior on Mobile Devices over Time: A User Evaluation Study
Hoffman, L. H., & Fang, H. (2014) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2014.929996 · Cited by 5
Partisan Media and Polarization: Challenges for Future Work
Levendusky, M. S. (2016) · Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.50 · Cited by 5
Inside the Echo Chamber: Disentangling network dynamics from polarizationPreprint
Balsamo, D., Gelardi, V., Han, C., Rama, D., Samantray, A., Zucca, C., & Starnini, M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.09076 · Cited by 9
The Manufacture of Political Echo Chambers by Follow Train Abuse on Twitter.Preprint
Torres-Lugo, C., Yang, K.-C., & Menczer, F. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 5
Is radicalization reinforced by social media censorship?Preprint
Lane, J. E., McCaffree, K. J., & Shults, F. L. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.12842 · Cited by 5
Huang, J. T., Choi, J., & Wan, Y. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4990476 · Cited by 5
Junk news bubbles modelling the rise and fall of attention in online arenas
Castaldo, M., Venturini, T., Frasca, P., & Gargiulo, F. (2021) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444820978640 · Cited by 32
Sosyal Medyadaki Yanlış Bilgiye Yönelik Kullanıcı Doğrulama Davranışlarının İncelenmesi
Salman, G. (2023) · Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.17829/turcom.1196015 · Cited by 4
Chae, S. W., & Lee, S. H. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0302030 · Cited by 6
Bao, Z., & Zong, W. J. (2025) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/02666669241313460 · Cited by 5
Dugoin-Clément, C. (2022) · Question(s) de management · doi:10.3917/qdm.217.0024 · Cited by 5
Reiter, F., Heiss, R., & Matthes, J. (2022) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/08944393211056224 · Cited by 5
Evaluating Digital Polarization in Multi-Party Systems: Evidence from the German Bundestag
Chin, A., Vieira, C. C., & Kim, J. (2022) · ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci) · doi:10.1145/3501247.3531547 · Cited by 4
Ardévol-Abreu, A., Costa-Sánchez, C., & Delponti, P. (2023) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2023.2173699 · Cited by 4
Mitigating Filter Bubbles Under a Competitive Diffusion Model
Banerjee, P., Chen, W., & Lakshmanan, L. V. S. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data · doi:10.1145/3589320 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Garrett, R. K.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Garrett, R. Kelly
- ORCID
- Garrett, R. Kelly
- Venue
- Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 265-285
- ISSN
- 1083-6101 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137809006
- Cited by
- 1,040
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 64 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 120 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 45.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
- Keywords
- selective exposure, echo chambers, online news, political information, political polarization, news avoidance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
