The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users
Open accessAbstract
A review of research suggests that the desire for opinion reinforcement may play a more important role in shaping individuals’ exposure to online political information than an aversion to opinion challenge. The article tests this idea using data collected via a web-administered behavior-tracking study with subjects recruited from the readership of 2 partisan online news sites (N = 727). The results demonstrate that opinion-reinforcing information promotes news story exposure while opinion-challenging information makes exposure only marginally less likely. The influence of both factors is modest, but opinion-reinforcing information is a more important predictor. Having decided to view a news story, evidence of an aversion to opinion challenges disappears: There is no evidence that individuals abandon news stories that contain information with which they disagree. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“Homophily in communication, the tendency of people to communicate with others having similar beliefs, is understood to lead to the formation of echo chambers which reinforce individual beliefs and fuel further increase in polarization.”
From Credibility of climate change denial in social media (2019) · cites this paper as Garrett, 2009
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“For example, homophily among liberals and conservatives in political blogs links (Adamic and Glance, 2005), i.e., the tendency of liberal and conservative blogs to link primarily within their separate communities, leads to echo chambers (Jasny et al., 2015;Garrett, 2009;Flaxman et al., 2016), and hence beliefs can be polarized due to such exposure to selective information (Bakshy et al., 2015).”
From Credibility of climate change denial in social media (2019) · cites this paper as Garrett, 2009
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, users show a tendency to favor information adhering to their beliefs and join groups formed around a shared narrative, that is, echo chambers (1, 14–18).”
From The echo chamber effect on social media (2021) · cites this paper as [15]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Estudios basados en encuestas encuentran que el efecto polarizador de la red no deriva de la tendencia de las cámaras de eco, sino más bien de la exposición transversal a los mensajes de personas con ideologías políticas opuestas (Bail y otros, 2018;Garrett, 2009).”
From Polarización, heterogeneidad política y redes sociales en México: un análisis comparativo de #PresidenteRompaElPacto, #FRENA y #RevocacionDeMandato en Twitter (2023) · cites this paper as Garrett, 2009
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“In social media, such polarized communication networks were observed in controversial debates ranging from political orientation [10, 11], US and French presidential elections [12], or street protests [13].”
From Modeling echo chambers and polarization dynamics in social networks (2020) · cites this paper as [13]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods.
Longford, N. T., Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2075823 · Cited by 18,773
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods
Davidian, M. (2003) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2003.s288 · Cited by 13,820
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098 · Cited by 4,583
Christoph, V. F., Lazarfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1945) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3707538 · Cited by 1,732
Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy
Mutz, D. C. (2006) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511617201 · Cited by 1,687
Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy
Mutz, D. C. (2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2388 · Cited by 1,588
Media Use and Political Predispositions: Revisiting the Concept of Selective Exposure
Stroud, N. J. (2008) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-007-9050-9 · Cited by 1,154
Recent Research on Selective Exposure to Information
Frey, D. (1986) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60212-9 · Cited by 820
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Kohut, 2006, Online papers modestly boost newspaper readership: Maturing Internet news audience-broader than deep
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 998
Media preference increases polarization in an agent-based election model
Benedetto, A., Wieners, C., Dijkstra, H. A., & Stoof, H. T. C. (2023) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2023.129014 · Cited by 6
Zareie, A., & Sakellariou, R. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3625826 · Cited by 5
Hanley, H. W. A., & Durumeric, Z. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3757661 · Cited by 8
Abril, E. P. (2015) · International journal of communication · Cited by 4
(How) do participants in online discussion forums create ‘echo chambers’?
Edwards, A. R. (2015) · Benjamins current topics · doi:10.1075/bct.76.06edw · Cited by 4
Content Sharing in Conflictual Ad-Hoc Twitter Discussions: National Patterns or Universal Trends?
Bodrunova, S. S., Smoliarova, A., Blekanov, I. S., & Litvinenko, A. (2017) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-69784-0_1 · Cited by 4
Myagkov, M., Kashpur, V. V., Baryshev, A. A., Goiko, V. L., & Shchekotin, E. V. (2019) · Region Regional Studies of Russia Eastern Europe and Central Asia · doi:10.1353/reg.2019.0002 · Cited by 4
READERS’ PERSPECTIVES: EXAMINING THE INFLUENCE OF POLITICAL NEWS IN ZIMBABWE
Mathe, L., & Osunkunle, O. O. (2019) · Communitas · doi:10.18820/24150525/comm.v24.10 · Cited by 4
Extremism definitions in opinion dynamics models
Martins, A. C. R. (2021) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2021.126623 · Cited by 5
Martin, J. D., Hassan, F., Anghelcev, G., Abunabaa, N., & Shaath, S. (2021) · International Communication Gazette · doi:10.1177/1748048521992486 · Cited by 4
La liminalité d’un contre-public sur YouTube
Mésangeau, J., & Morin, C. (2021) · Terminal · doi:10.4000/terminal.7089 · Cited by 4
(Im)balance in the Representation of News? An Extensive Study on a Decade Long Dataset from India
Chakraborty, S., Goyal, P., & Mukherjee, A. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-19097-1_22 · Cited by 4
Barnidge, M., Diehl, T., Sherrill, L. A., & Zhang, J. (2021) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqab023 · Cited by 6
Ao, S. H., Mak, A. K. Y., & Tsang, L. (2022) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102227 · Cited by 4
Facebook und andere soziale Medien
Schrape, J.-F., & Siri, J. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-37985-8_92 · Cited by 4
Santos, D. L. (2023) · Papers Revista de Sociologia · doi:10.5565/rev/papers.3082 · Cited by 4
Who Does Not Benefit from Fact-checking Websites?
Tanaka, Y., Inuzuka, M., Arai, H., Takahashi, Y., Kukita, M., & Inui, K. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580826 · Cited by 6
Opinion cascade under perception bias in social networks
Yu, H., Xue, B., Zhang, J., Liu, R.-R., Liu, Y., & Meng, F. (2023) · Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · doi:10.1063/5.0172121 · Cited by 4
Verovšek, P. J., & Gorišek, M. (2023) · Javnost - The Public · doi:10.1080/13183222.2023.2255821 · Cited by 5
How Sticky Is Pink Slime? Assessing the Credibility of Deceptive Local Media
Darr, J. (2023) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/00027162231214696 · Cited by 4
Alves, P. F., & Mutsvairo, B. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-10719-2_15 · Cited by 4
#Zuma Must Fall This February: Homophily on the Echo-Chambers of Political Leaders’ Twitter Accounts
Mukhudwana, R. F. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32682-1_10 · Cited by 4
Internet News User Analysis Using Deep Learning and Similarity Comparison
Choi, S. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11040569 · Cited by 4
Hong Kong as a City of Protest: Social Movement as Motor for Social Change
Chiu, S. W. K., & Siu, K. Y. (2022) · Hong Kong studies reader series · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-5707-8_10 · Cited by 4
What Viewers Want: Assessing the Impact of Host Bias on Viewer Engagement with Political Talk Shows
Bode, L., Vraga, E. K., Alvarez, G., Johnson, C. N., Konieczna, M., & Mirer, M. (2018) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2018.1519567 · Cited by 4
Exposure to Political Diversity Online.
Munson, S. A. (2012) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan) · Cited by 4
Freelon, D. (2014) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2014.923280 · Cited by 4
Being nice on the internet: Designing for the coexistence of diverse opinions online
Grevet, C. (2016) · SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology) · Cited by 4
Social Media Use Relates to Perceiving the United States as More Politically PolarizedPreprint
Gollwitzer, A. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3137325 · Cited by 4
Understanding Musicking on Social Media: Music Sharing, Sociality and Citizenship
Valverde, R. C. (2019) · Research Open (London South Bank University) · doi:10.18744/lsbu.88x09 · Cited by 4
Regulating 'Gatekeepers': Predictable 'Unitended Consequences' of the DMA for Users' WelfarePreprint
Bentata, P. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3804067 · Cited by 4
Morisi, D., Goldberg, M. H., & Jost, J. T. (2020) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/agjz2 · Cited by 4
From Burnout to Breakout: The Social Media-Supported Exodus from Teaching
Kerr, S. L., Schmeichel, M., & Wurzburg, B. (2025) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/01614681251335088 · Cited by 3
The Influence of Media Democracy on Attitudes towards Homosexuality in Taiwan and China
Li, X., & Hu, K. (2024) · International Journal of Taiwan Studies · doi:10.1163/24688800-20241314 · Cited by 3
Eren, İ., Altanlar, A., & Aktan, E. Ö. A. (2024) · Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering · doi:10.1080/13467581.2024.2397115 · Cited by 3
The Nature of Online Talk: Incivility of Opposing Views and Affective Polarization
Goel, N., & Merkley, E. (2024) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-024-09998-8 · Cited by 4
Strömbäck, J., Johansson, S., Broda, E., Espeland, E., & Ekström, H. (2025) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/19401612251337814 · Cited by 8
Lane, D. S., Chen, M., & Wang, Y. (2025) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqaf026 · Cited by 3
Online Media Bias and Political Participation in EU Member States; Cross-National Perspectives
Grecu, S.-P., Mihăilescu, B. C., & Vrânceanu, E. S. (2025) · Journalism and Media · doi:10.3390/journalmedia6030155 · Cited by 6
Kaye, B. K., & Johnson, T. J. (2011) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-61350-338-6.ch011 · Cited by 3
Min, Y. (2016) · Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies · doi:10.20879/kjjcs.2016.60.2.001 · Cited by 2
Framing Use of Force: An Analysis of News Organizations’ Social Media Posts About Police Shootings
Ash, E., Xu, Y., Jenkins, A., & Kumanyika, C. (2019) · Electronic News · doi:10.1177/1931243119850239 · Cited by 3
Janky, B., Kmetty, Z., & Szabó, G. (2019) · Politikatudományi szemle · doi:10.30718/poltud.hu.2019.2.7 · Cited by 3
Liu, Y., Keum, H., & Cho, J. (2020) · Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies · doi:10.20879/kjjcs.2020.64.4.008 · Cited by 3
Determinant factors of partisans’ confirmation bias in social media
Ardi, R., & Pradiri, A. P. (2021) · Humanitas Indonesian Psychological Journal · doi:10.26555/humanitas.v18i1.19664 · Cited by 3
Lu, Y., & Lee, J. K. (2021) · The Social Science Journal · doi:10.1080/03623319.2021.1937469 · Cited by 3
Strömbäck, J., Wikforss, Å. M., Glüer, K., Lindholm, T., & Oscarsson, H. E. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003111474-1 · Cited by 4
Januškevičiūtė, J. (2022) · Information & Media · doi:10.15388/im.2022.94.64 · Cited by 4
Ölmez, R., & Kavaklı, N. (2023) · RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi :/RumeliDe Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.29000/rumelide.1286022 · Cited by 3
Citizens’ awareness of electoral campaign pledges
Duval, D., & Pétry, F. (2023) · Party Politics · doi:10.1177/13540688231199976 · Cited by 3
Ariel, Y., Elishar-Malka, V., & Saks, D. W. (2024) · Journal of International Communication · doi:10.1080/13216597.2024.2340710 · Cited by 3
Sarathchandra, D., & Johnson-Leung, J. (2024) · COVID · doi:10.3390/covid4050045 · Cited by 3
Wang, Y., & Lin, X. (2024) · Chinese Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/17544750.2024.2377602 · Cited by 3
Preferences for advisor agreement and accuracy
Jaquiery, M., & Yeung, N. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0311211 · Cited by 4
Lee, S. Y., Lee, H., & Park, S. (2024) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edae050 · Cited by 3
Decoding Political Polarization in Social Media Interactions
Pecile, G., Marco, N. D., Cinelli, M., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2025) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-82435-7_23 · Cited by 4
Eilders, C., & Porten-Cheé, P. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-06151-7_13 · Cited by 3
Bae, S. Y. (2013) · JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government · doi:10.29379/jedem.v5i1.206 · Cited by 3
Castro, L., & Nir, L. (2020) · International journal of communication · doi:10.5167/uzh-196242 · Cited by 2
The internet, race, and U.S. democracy
Kleinberg, M. S. (2014) · doi:10.7282/t3r78cqb · Cited by 3
Media's Mediating Effects in the Korean Election
이소영 (2015) · Korean Political Science Review · doi:10.18854/kpsr.2015.49.5.011 · Cited by 3
Filterblasen – Ausgangspunkte einer neuen, fremdverschuldeten Unmündigkeit?
Ovens, C. (2017) · kommunikation gesellschaft · doi:10.15460/kommges.2017.18.2.582 · Cited by 3
Campaign-Specific Information and Media Effects
Daoust, J., & Sullivan, K. V. R. (2017) · Canadian Journal of Communication · doi:10.22230/cjc.2017v42n4a3144 · Cited by 3
Subduing attitude polarization?
Abril, E. P. (2018) · Politics and the Life Sciences · doi:10.1017/pls.2017.11 · Cited by 3
Compliance of Personalized Radio with Public-Service Remits
Hirschmeier, S., & Beule, V. (2018) · ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP) · doi:10.1145/3213586.3226204 · Cited by 3
Directionality of information flow and echoes without chambers
Kim, S. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215949 · Cited by 3
Stationary States in a Model of Position Selection by Individuals
Petrov, A., & Proncheva, O. G. (2020) · Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1134/s0965542520100115 · Cited by 3
Jungherr, A. M., Rivero, G., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108297820.008 · Cited by 5
Disinformation propagation in social networks as a diplomacy strategy: analysis from system dynamics
Rincón, A. G., & Cánovas, B. R. (2021) · JANUS NET e-journal of International Relation · doi:10.26619/1647-7251.dt21.3 · Cited by 3
Digital Media and Social Movements: Obstacles to Building a Global Media Ethic
Rohlinger, D. A., & DeLucchi, C. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32103-5_27 · Cited by 3
Judging “Them” by My Media Use: Exploring the Cause and Consequences of Perceived Selective Exposure
Qin, A. Y. (2021) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2021.1977327 · Cited by 3
Bode, L., Edgerly, S., Sayre, B., Vraga, E. K., & Shah, D. V. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444361506.wbiems128 · Cited by 3
News consumption and social media regulations policyPreprint
Etta, G., Cinelli, M., Galeazzi, A., Valensise, C. M., Conti, M., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.03924 · Cited by 3
Khan, M. A., Muhammad, K., Smyth, B., & Coyle, D. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.07045 · Cited by 5
Parent and Community Political Orientation Predicts Children’s Health BehaviorsPreprint
Gollwitzer, A., Marshall, J., Lee, Y.-E., Deutchman, P., Warneken, F., & McAuliffe, K. (2022) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/djhkp · Cited by 4
How Ambient Cues Facilitate Political SegregationPreprint
Motyl, M. S., Prims, J., & Iyer, R. (2019) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/47zwv · Cited by 3
Sindermann, C., Elhai, J. D., Moshagen, M., & Montag, C. (2019) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/ymvwf · Cited by 3
Lee, P. S., Zhao, M., Cheung, K., hu, S., & Chang, C.-Y. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4149634 · Cited by 3
Online Attention Dynamics in Social Media
Castaldo, M., Frasca, P., & Venturini, T. (2023) · doi:10.1002/9781119857433.ch18 · Cited by 3
Motivations to affiliate with like-minded audiences increase partisan sharing on social mediaPreprint
Marie, A., & Petersen, M. B. (2023) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/nmg9h · Cited by 3
Spiral of Silence and Social Conflict
Gearhart, S., & Adegbola, O. (2025) · doi:10.1002/9781119895534.ch13 · Cited by 3
Miao, B., & Ding, H. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1370870 · Cited by 3
Tanni, T. I., Necaise, A., Solihin, Y., & Amon, M. J. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-61281-7_29 · Cited by 2
Trust in media and processing of health information during the Covid-19 pandemic
Park, C. S. (2024) · Health & New Media Research · doi:10.22720/hnmr.2024.00045 · Cited by 2
Kasahara, I., & Karasawa, M. (2025) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajsp.12677 · Cited by 4
Tanaka, Y., Arai, H., Inuzuka, M., Takahashi, Y., Kukita, M., Iseki, R., & Inui, K. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3714243 · Cited by 2
Breaking the Loop: Causal Learning to Mitigate Echo Chambers in Social Networks
Yu, D., Li, Q., Huo, H., & Xu, G. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3757738 · Cited by 2
Factors and mechanisms of attitude polarization in online public opinion
Cheng, Q., Li, Y., Chen, H., & Li, Y. (2025) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104497 · Cited by 2
Opinion polarization and its connected disagreement: Modeling and modulation
Qian, X., Qin, B.-W., Zhu, H., & Lin, W. (2025) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/rldl-6t9s · Cited by 2
How commenter-following shapes news exposure: homophily and selective exposure in naver news
Nam, J., Ro, Y., Jang, M., & Baek, H. (2025) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-02-2025-0079 · Cited by 2
Qian, Y., Xia, C., Wang, J., & Tanimoto, J. (2026) · Applied Mathematics and Computation · doi:10.1016/j.amc.2026.130020 · Cited by 2
Echo chamber dynamics on social media
Ruiz, C. A. D. (2026) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448261441872 · Cited by 2
Disinformation elicits learning biases
Vidal-Perez, J., Dolan, R. J., & Moran, R. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.106073.4 · Cited by 3
Dai, J.-L., Ni, P.-K., Su, K., Zhu, J.-M., Wu, W.-L., & Du, D.-Z. (2026) · Expert systems with applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2026.134131 · Cited by 2
Political Diversity and Participation: A Systematic Review of the Measurement and Relationship
Jun, N. (2014) · Asian Journal for Public Opinion Research · doi:10.15206/ajpor.2014.1.2.103 · Cited by 2
Harder, R., Velasco, A., Evans, M. S., An, C., & Rockmore, D. N. (2017) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3041021.3053364 · Cited by 2
The Rise of Digital Media and the Retooling of Politics
Jungherr, A. M., Rivero, G., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108297820.001 · Cited by 3
Lo, K.-C., Dai, S.-C., Xiong, A., Jiang, J., & Ku, L. (2021) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3442442.3458613 · Cited by 2
GENDERED MYTHS, RISKS AND THE SOCIAL AMPLIFICATION OF MALE RAPE: ONLINE DISCOURSES
Sitto, K., & Lubinga, E. (2020) · Communitas · doi:10.18820/24150525/comm.v25.9 · Cited by 2
Sánchez, F., & Rodríguez-Paniagua, A. (2022) · Foro de Educación · doi:10.14516/fde.838 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Garrett, R. K.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Garrett, R. Kelly
- ORCID
- Garrett, R. Kelly
- Venue
- Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 265-285
- ISSN
- 1083-6101 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137809006
- Cited by
- 1,040
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 64 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 120 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 45.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
- Keywords
- selective exposure, echo chambers, online news, political information, political polarization, news avoidance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
