The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users
Open accessAbstract
A review of research suggests that the desire for opinion reinforcement may play a more important role in shaping individuals’ exposure to online political information than an aversion to opinion challenge. The article tests this idea using data collected via a web-administered behavior-tracking study with subjects recruited from the readership of 2 partisan online news sites (N = 727). The results demonstrate that opinion-reinforcing information promotes news story exposure while opinion-challenging information makes exposure only marginally less likely. The influence of both factors is modest, but opinion-reinforcing information is a more important predictor. Having decided to view a news story, evidence of an aversion to opinion challenges disappears: There is no evidence that individuals abandon news stories that contain information with which they disagree. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“Homophily in communication, the tendency of people to communicate with others having similar beliefs, is understood to lead to the formation of echo chambers which reinforce individual beliefs and fuel further increase in polarization.”
From Credibility of climate change denial in social media (2019) · cites this paper as Garrett, 2009
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“For example, homophily among liberals and conservatives in political blogs links (Adamic and Glance, 2005), i.e., the tendency of liberal and conservative blogs to link primarily within their separate communities, leads to echo chambers (Jasny et al., 2015;Garrett, 2009;Flaxman et al., 2016), and hence beliefs can be polarized due to such exposure to selective information (Bakshy et al., 2015).”
From Credibility of climate change denial in social media (2019) · cites this paper as Garrett, 2009
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, users show a tendency to favor information adhering to their beliefs and join groups formed around a shared narrative, that is, echo chambers (1, 14–18).”
From The echo chamber effect on social media (2021) · cites this paper as [15]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Estudios basados en encuestas encuentran que el efecto polarizador de la red no deriva de la tendencia de las cámaras de eco, sino más bien de la exposición transversal a los mensajes de personas con ideologías políticas opuestas (Bail y otros, 2018;Garrett, 2009).”
From Polarización, heterogeneidad política y redes sociales en México: un análisis comparativo de #PresidenteRompaElPacto, #FRENA y #RevocacionDeMandato en Twitter (2023) · cites this paper as Garrett, 2009
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“In social media, such polarized communication networks were observed in controversial debates ranging from political orientation [10, 11], US and French presidential elections [12], or street protests [13].”
From Modeling echo chambers and polarization dynamics in social networks (2020) · cites this paper as [13]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods.
Longford, N. T., Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2075823 · Cited by 18,773
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods
Davidian, M. (2003) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2003.s288 · Cited by 13,820
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098 · Cited by 4,583
Christoph, V. F., Lazarfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1945) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3707538 · Cited by 1,732
Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy
Mutz, D. C. (2006) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511617201 · Cited by 1,687
Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy
Mutz, D. C. (2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2388 · Cited by 1,588
Media Use and Political Predispositions: Revisiting the Concept of Selective Exposure
Stroud, N. J. (2008) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-007-9050-9 · Cited by 1,154
Recent Research on Selective Exposure to Information
Frey, D. (1986) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60212-9 · Cited by 820
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Kohut, 2006, Online papers modestly boost newspaper readership: Maturing Internet news audience-broader than deep
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 998
Protest online: Theorizing the consequences of online engagement
Earl, J. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316337790.015 · Cited by 21
Organization and evolution of the UK far-right network on Telegram
Bovet, A., & Grindrod, P. (2022) · Applied Network Science · doi:10.1007/s41109-022-00513-8 · Cited by 47
Aghajari, Z., Baumer, E. P. S., & DiFranzo, D. J. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3579520 · Cited by 57
Shen, F., Xia, C., & Škorić, M. M. (2019) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2019.101303 · Cited by 45
Self-imposed filter bubbles: Selective attention and exposure in online search
Ekström, A. G., Niehorster, D. C., & Olsson, E. J. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100226 · Cited by 45
Kaiser, J., Vaccari, C., & Chadwick, A. (2022) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqac002 · Cited by 44
de Zúñiga, H. G., Cheng, Z., & González-González, P. (2022) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqac025 · Cited by 52
Political Homophily in a Large-Scale Online Communication Network
Bond, R. M., & Sweitzer, M. D. (2018) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650218813655 · Cited by 50
The drivers of online polarization: Fitting models to data
Valensise, C. M., Cinelli, M., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2023) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2023.119152 · Cited by 48
Arlt, D., Rauchfleisch, A., & Schäfer, M. S. (2018) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2018.1430600 · Cited by 43
Individual-level differences in negativity biases in news selection
Bachleda, S., Neuner, F. G., Soroka, S., Guggenheim, L., Fournier, P., & Naurin, E. (2019) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.109675 · Cited by 46
Abdenour, J., McIntyre, K. E., & Dahmen, N. S. (2020) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2020.1716828 · Cited by 42
Zhu, Q., Weeks, B. E., & Kwak, N. (2021) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448211061336 · Cited by 45
Lee, F. L. F., Chan, M., Chen, H., Nielsen, R. K., & Fletcher, R. (2019) · Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/1461670x.2019.1586567 · Cited by 45
Mazarr, M. J., Bauer, R., Casey, A., Heintz, S., & Matthews, L. J. (2019) · RAND Corporation eBooks · doi:10.7249/rr2714 · Cited by 47
Optimizing sensors placement in complex networks for localization of hidden signal source: A review
Paluch, R., Gajewski, Ł. G., Hołyst, J. A., & Szymanski, B. K. (2020) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2020.06.023 · Cited by 42
The Public Service Approach to Recommender Systems: Filtering to Cultivate
Hildén, J. (2021) · Television & New Media · doi:10.1177/15274764211020106 · Cited by 58
Computer-Mediated False Consensus: Radical Online Groups, Social Networks and News Media
Wojcieszak, M. (2011) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2010.513795 · Cited by 42
Militant meninism: the militaristic discourse of Gamergate and Men’s Rights Activism
O’Donnell, J. (2019) · Media Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0163443719876624 · Cited by 41
Tell me Something My Friends do not Know: Diversity Maximization in Social Networks
Matakos, A., Tu, S., & Gionis, A. (2018) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-020-01456-1 · Cited by 41
Bruno, M., Lambiotte, R., & Saracco, F. (2022) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00330-0 · Cited by 40
Clarifying Relationships Between Ideology and Ideologically Oriented Cable TV News Use
Holbert, R., Hmielowski, J. D., & Weeks, B. E. (2012) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650211405650 · Cited by 51
Post, S. (2018) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1093/ct/qty022 · Cited by 40
From Low-Choice to High-Choice Media Environments
Strömbäck, J., Boomgaarden, H. G., Broda, E., Damstra, A., Lindgren, E., Tsfati, Y., & Vliegenthart, R. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003111474-3 · Cited by 47
Echo chambers in the age of misinformationPreprint
Vicario, M. D., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Antonio Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., Stanley, E., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1509.00189 · Cited by 40
van der Meer, T. G. L. A., & Hameleers, M. (2022) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2021.2019074 · Cited by 39
Jiang, J., Ren, X., & Ferrara, E. (2023) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22160 · Cited by 44
Hube, C. (2017) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3041021.3053375 · Cited by 39
Reducing Controversy by Connecting Opposing Views
Garimella, K., Morales, G. D. F., Gionis, A., & Mathioudakis, M. (2018) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2018/731 · Cited by 39
Analyzing change in network polarization
Kearney, M. W. (2019) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444818822813 · Cited by 39
Bots and Computational Propaganda: Automation for Communication and Control
Woolley, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.006 · Cited by 41
Lifestyle Enclaves in the Instagram City?
Boy, J. D., & Uitermark, J. (2020) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305120940698 · Cited by 46
Leveraging Structured Trusted-Peer Assessments to Combat Misinformation
Jahanbakhsh, F., Zhang, A. X., & Karger, D. R. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555637 · Cited by 44
Choi, D.-H., & Shin, D. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.022 · Cited by 44
Social media and political partisanship – A subaltern public sphere’s role in democracy
Lee, P. S. N., So, C. Y. K., Lee, F. L. F., Leung, L. W., & Chan, M. (2018) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.06.007 · Cited by 43
Majó-Vázquez, S., Nielsen, R. K., & González‐Bailón, S. (2018) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2018.1546244 · Cited by 38
Facts and Where to Find Them: Empirical Research on Internet Platforms and Content Moderation
Keller, D., & Leerssen, P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.011 · Cited by 39
Leveraging volunteer fact checking to identify misinformation about COVID-19 in social media
Kim, H., & Walker, D. (2020) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-021 · Cited by 42
Young, D. G., & Miller, J. M. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197541302.013.15 · Cited by 39
Fostering Civil Discourse Online
Rho, E. H. R., Mark, G. J., & Mazmanian, M. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3274416 · Cited by 40
Kim, Y. (2018) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edy032 · Cited by 44
Vraga, E. K., & Tully, M. (2019) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2019.1572565 · Cited by 37
Simon, M., Welbers, K., Kroon, A. C., & Trilling, D. (2022) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2022.2133549 · Cited by 48
Lee, F. L. F., & Chan, J. (2015) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2015.04.013 · Cited by 37
Edwards, A. (2013) · Journal of Argumentation in Context · doi:10.1075/jaic.2.1.06edw · Cited by 36
Memory for Positive and Negative Political TV Ads: The Role of Partisanship and Gamma Power
Morey, A. C. (2017) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2016.1266534 · Cited by 35
Grusauskaite, K., Carbone, L., Harambam, J., & Aupers, S. (2024) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448231162585 · Cited by 37
Park, C. S. (2019) · Communication Studies · doi:10.1080/10510974.2019.1581627 · Cited by 43
Can Confirmation Bias Improve Group Learning?
Gabriel, N., & O’Connor, C. (2024) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1017/psa.2023.176 · Cited by 35
Donsbach, W., & Mothes, C. (2013) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2013.11679124 · Cited by 35
Uyheng, J., Magelinski, T., Cox, R. A. V., Lepird, C. S., & Carley, K. M. (2019) · Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory · doi:10.1007/s10588-019-09298-1 · Cited by 36
Wu, S., & Resnick, P. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v15i1.18105 · Cited by 34
How Does Treatment Self-Selection Affect Inferences About Political Communication?
Leeper, T. J. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Political Science · doi:10.1017/xps.2017.1 · Cited by 33
Democratic Creative Destruction? The Effect of a Changing Media Landscape on Democracy
Nielsen, R. K., & Fletcher, R. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.008 · Cited by 35
Tweeting ourselves to death: the cultural logic of digital capitalism
Törnberg, P., & Uitermark, J. (2022) · Media, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/01634437211053766 · Cited by 33
Polarisierung im Social Web und der intervenierende Effekt von Bildung
Hagen, L. M., der Au, A.-M. I., & Wieland, M. (2017) · kommunikation gesellschaft · doi:10.15460/kommges.2017.18.2.581 · Cited by 32
Blinded by the Spite? Path Model of Political Attitudes, Selectivity, and Social Media
Johnson, T. J., Kaye, B. K., & Lee, A. M. (2017) · Atlantic Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/15456870.2017.1324454 · Cited by 35
We are the Change that we Seek
McKay, D., Makri, S., Lopez, M. G., MacFarlane, A., Missaoui, S., Porlezza, C., & Cooper, G. (2020) · Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3343413.3377975 · Cited by 37
Depolarization of echo chambers by random dynamical nudge
Currin, C. B., Vera, S. V., & Khaledi‐Nasab, A. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-12494-w · Cited by 36
Kim, M.-H. (2014) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2013.877486 · Cited by 32
Park, H. W., & Park, S. (2024) · Asian Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/01292986.2024.2315584 · Cited by 30
The tyranny of perceived opinion: Freedom and information in the era of big data
Sætra, H. S. (2019) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101155 · Cited by 34
Online Relationships and Social Media Interaction in Youth Problem Gambling: A Four-Country Study
Savolainen, I., Kaakinen, M., Sirola, A., Koivula, A., Hagfors, H., Zych, I., Paek, H., & Oksanen, A. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17218133 · Cited by 40
Opinion influence maximization problem in online social networks based on group polarization effect
Dai, J., Zhu, J., & Wang, G. (2022) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2022.07.086 · Cited by 30
Partisan Identification as a Predictor of Cortisol Response to Election News
Blanton, H., Strauts, E., & Pérez, M. (2012) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2012.736239 · Cited by 30
Blogging about Climate Change in Russia: Activism, Scepticism and Conspiracies
Poberezhskaya, M. (2017) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2017.1308406 · Cited by 30
Explaining the Emergence of Echo Chambers on Social Media: The Role of Ideology and ExtremismPreprint
Bright, J. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2839728 · Cited by 30
Epistemic injustice in workplace hierarchies: Power, knowledge and status
Kwok, C. (2020) · Philosophy & Social Criticism · doi:10.1177/0191453720961523 · Cited by 30
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF DICTATORSHIP
Jung, C. G. (1978) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691216393-018 · Cited by 29
Wheeler, N., Allidina, S., Long, E. U., Schneider, S. P., Haas, I. J., & Cunningham, W. A. (2020) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.05.002 · Cited by 36
Headline Format Influences Evaluation of, but Not Engagement with, Environmental News
Janét, K., Richards, O., & Landrum, A. R. (2020) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2020.1805794 · Cited by 29
Lissitsa, S. (2021) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101633 · Cited by 31
Zelenkauskaitė, A. (2021) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.3998/mpub.12237294 · Cited by 32
Su, M.-H., Suk, J., & Rojas, H. (2022) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051211069056 · Cited by 31
Borah, P., Thorson, K., & Hwang, H. (2015) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2015.1008608 · Cited by 34
Mustapha, L. K., & Omar, B. (2020) · The Round Table · doi:10.1080/00358533.2020.1788766 · Cited by 29
Maximizing the Diversity of Exposure in a Social Network
Matakos, A., Aslay, Ç., Galbrun, E., & Gionis, A. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2020.3038711 · Cited by 28
Baranowski, P., Kruschinski, S., Rußmann, U., Haßler, J., Magin, M., Bene, M., Cerón, A., Jackson, D., & Lilleker, D. G. (2022) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2022.2115598 · Cited by 35
Ardèvol‐Abreu, A., Barnidge, M., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2016) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2016.1244855 · Cited by 28
From Context Collapse to “Safe Spaces”: Selective Avoidance through Tie Dissolution on Social Media
Zhu, Q., & Škorić, M. M. (2021) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2021.1883671 · Cited by 28
Online cultural backlash? sexism and political user-generated content
Inguanzo, I., Zhang, B., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2021) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2021.1962940 · Cited by 30
Boonprakong, N., Chen, X., Davey, C. E., Tag, B., & Dingler, T. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580917 · Cited by 35
Bubble Trouble: Strategies Against Filter Bubbles in Online Social Networks
Burbach, L., Halbach, P., Ziefle, M., & Valdez, A. S. C. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-22219-2_33 · Cited by 28
Public attitudes to COVID-19 vaccines: A qualitative studyPreprint
Williams, S. N., & Dienes, K. (2021) · medRxiv · doi:10.31234/osf.io/h87s3 · Cited by 28
Zhang, L., Bi, W., Zhang, N., & He, L. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2267931 · Cited by 27
Maia, R. C. M., Hauber, G., Choucair, T., & Crepalde, N. (2020) · Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0032321719894708 · Cited by 18
Wu, Y. R., & Shen, F. (2020) · Asian Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/01292986.2020.1784968 · Cited by 28
UNDERSTANDING ‘FAKE NEWS’: A BIBLIOGRAPHIC PERSPECTIVE
PARK, A. W., Montecchi, M., Feng, C. ‘., Plangger, K. A., & PITT, L. F. (2020) · Defence Strategic Communications · doi:10.30966/2018.riga.8.4 · Cited by 27
#Democracy: social media use and democratic legitimacy in Central and Eastern Europe
Placek, M. A. (2017) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2016.1202929 · Cited by 27
Chan, M., & Lee, F. L. F. (2014) · Asian Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/01292986.2014.903424 · Cited by 26
Maximizing the Diversity of Exposure in a Social Network
Aslay, Ç., Matakos, A., Galbrun, E., & Gionis, A. (2018) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm.2018.00102 · Cited by 26
Comparative Media Regulation in the United States and Europe
Fukuyama, F., & Grotto, A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.010 · Cited by 28
Lee, S., & Moon, W.-K. (2021) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102084 · Cited by 28
Tintarev, N., Sullivan, E., Guldin, D. A., Qiu, S., & Odjik, D. (2018) · ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP) · doi:10.1145/3213586.3226203 · Cited by 25
COMUNICACIÓN POLÍTICA, ELECCIONES Y DEMOCRACIA: LAS CAMPAÑAS DE DONALD TRUMP Y JAIR BOLSONARO
Ituassu, A., Capone, L., Firmino, L. M., Mannheimer, V., & Murta, F. (2019) · Perspectivas de la comunicación · doi:10.4067/s0718-48672019000200011 · Cited by 26
Images of Immigrants and Refugees
Heinderyckx, F., Joris, W., & d’Haenens, L. (2019) · Leuven University Press eBooks · doi:10.11116/9789461662811 · Cited by 44
Partisan Bias in Political Judgment
Ditto, P. H., Celniker, J. B., Siddiqi, S. S., Güngör, M., & Relihan, D. P. (2025) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-030424-122723 · Cited by 25
Feldman, L., Wojcieszak, M., Stroud, N. J., & Bimber, B. (2018) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2017.1375502 · Cited by 25
Echo Chambers Exist! (But They're Full of Opposing Views)
Bright, J., Marchal, N., Ganesh, B., & Rudinac, S. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.11461 · Cited by 25
Nouri, L., & Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2019) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Garrett, R. K.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Garrett, R. Kelly
- ORCID
- Garrett, R. Kelly
- Venue
- Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 265-285
- ISSN
- 1083-6101 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137809006
- Cited by
- 1,040
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 64 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 120 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 45.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
- Keywords
- selective exposure, echo chambers, online news, political information, political polarization, news avoidance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
