The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users
Open accessAbstract
A review of research suggests that the desire for opinion reinforcement may play a more important role in shaping individuals’ exposure to online political information than an aversion to opinion challenge. The article tests this idea using data collected via a web-administered behavior-tracking study with subjects recruited from the readership of 2 partisan online news sites (N = 727). The results demonstrate that opinion-reinforcing information promotes news story exposure while opinion-challenging information makes exposure only marginally less likely. The influence of both factors is modest, but opinion-reinforcing information is a more important predictor. Having decided to view a news story, evidence of an aversion to opinion challenges disappears: There is no evidence that individuals abandon news stories that contain information with which they disagree. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“Homophily in communication, the tendency of people to communicate with others having similar beliefs, is understood to lead to the formation of echo chambers which reinforce individual beliefs and fuel further increase in polarization.”
From Credibility of climate change denial in social media (2019) · cites this paper as Garrett, 2009
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“For example, homophily among liberals and conservatives in political blogs links (Adamic and Glance, 2005), i.e., the tendency of liberal and conservative blogs to link primarily within their separate communities, leads to echo chambers (Jasny et al., 2015;Garrett, 2009;Flaxman et al., 2016), and hence beliefs can be polarized due to such exposure to selective information (Bakshy et al., 2015).”
From Credibility of climate change denial in social media (2019) · cites this paper as Garrett, 2009
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, users show a tendency to favor information adhering to their beliefs and join groups formed around a shared narrative, that is, echo chambers (1, 14–18).”
From The echo chamber effect on social media (2021) · cites this paper as [15]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Estudios basados en encuestas encuentran que el efecto polarizador de la red no deriva de la tendencia de las cámaras de eco, sino más bien de la exposición transversal a los mensajes de personas con ideologías políticas opuestas (Bail y otros, 2018;Garrett, 2009).”
From Polarización, heterogeneidad política y redes sociales en México: un análisis comparativo de #PresidenteRompaElPacto, #FRENA y #RevocacionDeMandato en Twitter (2023) · cites this paper as Garrett, 2009
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“In social media, such polarized communication networks were observed in controversial debates ranging from political orientation [10, 11], US and French presidential elections [12], or street protests [13].”
From Modeling echo chambers and polarization dynamics in social networks (2020) · cites this paper as [13]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods.
Longford, N. T., Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2075823 · Cited by 18,773
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods
Davidian, M. (2003) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2003.s288 · Cited by 13,820
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098 · Cited by 4,583
Christoph, V. F., Lazarfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1945) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3707538 · Cited by 1,732
Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy
Mutz, D. C. (2006) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511617201 · Cited by 1,687
Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy
Mutz, D. C. (2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2388 · Cited by 1,588
Media Use and Political Predispositions: Revisiting the Concept of Selective Exposure
Stroud, N. J. (2008) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-007-9050-9 · Cited by 1,154
Recent Research on Selective Exposure to Information
Frey, D. (1986) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60212-9 · Cited by 820
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Kohut, 2006, Online papers modestly boost newspaper readership: Maturing Internet news audience-broader than deep
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 998
Peña, E. F., Ramajo, N., & Nieto, A. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003134176-9 · Cited by 2
Kozman, C., So, C. Y. K., Salim, S. K., Movahedian, M., Amin, J. E., & Melki, J. P. (2022) · Online Media and Global Communication · doi:10.1515/omgc-2022-0053 · Cited by 2
De l’information aux industries culturelles, l’hypothèse chahutée de la bulle de filtre
Farchy, J., & Tallec, S. (2023) · Questions de communication · doi:10.4000/questionsdecommunication.31474 · Cited by 2
Stronger Than Yesterday: Investigating Peoples' Experiences of View Strengthening on Social Media
Beall, S., Makri, S., & McKay, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.767 · Cited by 2
Piaia, V. R., de Almeida, S. K. O., Dourado, T. M. S. G., Canavarro, M., Dienstbach, D., Cordeiro, M. S., da Silva, L. R., & Carvalho, D. S. (2023) · Canadian Journal of Communication · doi:10.3138/cjc-2022-0060 · Cited by 2
Colacrai, E., Cinus, F., Morales, G. D. F., & Starnini, M. (2024) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3589334.3645606 · Cited by 4
Knowing more, worrying less? Internet use eases public concern about immigrant cultural threat
Xia, S. (2024) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102591 · Cited by 2
Cross-border political competition
Segovia‐Martín, J., & Rivero, Ó. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0297731 · Cited by 2
The speed of neutral evolution on graphs
Gao, S. D., Liu, Y., & Wu, B. (2024) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2023.0594 · Cited by 2
Exposición selectiva, confianza en medios y tolerancia a compartir desinformación
Pardo, Ó. I. L., & García‐Perdomo, V. (2024) · INDEX COMUNICACIÓN · doi:10.62008/ixc/14/02exposi · Cited by 2
A necessary and sufficient condition for stable polarization
Wang, Y., & Wu, B. (2024) · Chinese Control Conference (CCC) · doi:10.23919/ccc63176.2024.10661796 · Cited by 2
Mena‐Meléndez, L., Crawford, B. L., Valdez, D., LaRoche, K. J., Turner, R. C., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2024) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2024.1422318 · Cited by 3
Riedl, J., Drews, W., & Richter, F. (2024) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2024.1509981 · Cited by 2
DEMOCRACIA, REPRESENTAÇÃO POLÍTICA E POPULISMO NA ERA DAS TECNOLOGIAS DIGITAIS
Kritsch, R., da Silva, A. L., & Teixeira, R. P. (2024) · Lua Nova Revista de Cultura e Política · doi:10.1590/0102-123042rk/123 · Cited by 2
Azad, Z. R., Spampatti, T., Gluth, S., Tam, K., & Hahnel, U. J. J. (2025) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.70028 · Cited by 5
Predictors of partisan news selection and political misinformation sharing
Jackson, D. L., & Hoewe, J. (2025) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637751.2025.2557484 · Cited by 3
Spreadable Media, Citizens, and Participatory Culture : Uses and Effects of Political Internet Memes
Leiser, A. (2019) · Cited by 2
Wie Menschen mit konfligierenden Informationen umgehen
Abendroth, J., Feulner, L., & Richter, T. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-58695-2_13 · Cited by 2
Twits, Toxic Tweets, and Tribal Tendencies: Trends in Politically Polarized Posts on Twitter
Hanley, H. W. A., & Durumeric, Z. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3757684 · Cited by 7
Digital TV Transition and the Hard Disk Drive Revolution in Television Watching
Wahlström, M., & Kankainen, A. (2011) · International journal of communication · Cited by 2
Kim, H. J. (2017) · Journal of Public Relations · doi:10.15814/jpr.2017.21.4.56 · Cited by 2
Mapping the Invocation Structure of Online Political Interaction
Raghavan, M., Anderson, A., & Kleinberg, J. M. (2018) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3178876.3186129 · Cited by 2
Knudsen, E., Iversen, M. H., & Vatnøy, E. (2018) · Norsk medietidsskrift · doi:10.18261/issn.0805-9535-2018-02-04 · Cited by 2
Selective exposure and the authoritarian dynamic: Evidence from Canada and the United States
Hinckley, R. A., & Harell, A. (2020) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v8i1.1085 · Cited by 2
The impact of language and systemic factors on tweeted countries of the world
Wu, H. D. (2020) · Journal of International Communication · doi:10.1080/13216597.2020.1793797 · Cited by 3
Kwon, H. (2020) · UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico) · Cited by 2
Yang, C., Nunes, B. P., dos Santos, J. C., Siqueira, S. W. M., & Xu, X. (2021) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1145/3487351.3489482 · Cited by 2
Kruse, M.-M. (2022) · Critical studies in media and communication · doi:10.1515/9783839461471 · Cited by 7
Kunjar, S., Strandburg‐Peshkin, A., Giese, H., Minasandra, P., Sarkar, S., Jolly, M. K., & Gradwohl, N. (2023) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.230215 · Cited by 2
Zumofen, G. (2023) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2023.2221681 · Cited by 2
The truth or your truth: polarization in Arctic climate change on X (Twitter)
Poelzer, G. A. (2024) · Polar Geography · doi:10.1080/1088937x.2024.2402757 · Cited by 3
How the Pro-Beijing Media Influences Voters: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment
Kao, J. C. (2026) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055426101476 · Cited by 2
Web 2.0, social media and the new paradigm of information media
Vidaković, M. (2018) · Kultura · doi:10.5937/kultura1860305v · Cited by 2
The concept of authorial legacy in polarised debate on the ethics of social media-driven activism
Rajkhowa, A. (2020) · Media Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0163443720957888 · Cited by 2
Johnson, T. J., & Lee, A. M. (2015) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2015.08.008 · Cited by 3
Misinformation on the Internet?: A Study of Vaccine Safety Beliefs
Doty, C. (2015) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 2
Measuring Verifiability in Online InformationPreprint
Harder, R., Velasco, A. J., Evans, M. S., & Rockmore, D. N. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1509.05631 · Cited by 2
Rinke, E. M., & Lück, J. (2018) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/q38my · Cited by 2
Flocking and spreading dynamics in populations of self-propelled agentsPreprint
Levis, D., Dı́az-Guilera, A., Pagonabarraga, I., & Starnini, M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.08831 · Cited by 2
Crowd control: Reducing individual estimation bias by sharing biased social informationPreprint
Jayles, B., Sire, C., & Kurvers, R. H. J. M. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/hn8rz · Cited by 2
Infodemics on Youtube: Reliability of Content and Echo Chambers on COVID-19Preprint
Marco, N. D., Cinelli, M., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.27101.33766 · Cited by 2
Valladares, T. L., Golino, H. F., & Coan, J. A. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/u8ghv · Cited by 2
Empirical Social Asset PricingPreprint
Hwang, B. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4118285 · Cited by 2
Diversity of News Consumption in a Digital Information Environment
Löecherbach, F. (2023) · doi:10.5463/thesis.165 · Cited by 6
Disinformation elicits learning biasesPreprint
Vidal-Perez, J., Dolan, R. J., & Moran, R. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.106073.1 · Cited by 2
López-Robles, A. (2023) · Revista de la Asociación Española de Investigación de la Comunicación · doi:10.24137/raeic.10.19.12 · Cited by 1
Public Sphere Distortion in the Age of Internet Giants
Sabra, I., & Elkadi, M. (2022) · Journal of Law and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.54873/jolets.v2i1.70 · Cited by 1
Hu, Y., & Chen, H. (2022) · Journal of Intercultural Communication Research · doi:10.1080/17475759.2022.2142271 · Cited by 1
Digitale Informationsumgebungen: Echokammern, Filterblasen, Fake News und Algorithmen
Jungherr, A. M. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-31480-4_34-1 · Cited by 1
Çağdaş Toplumlarda Hakikatin Yeniden Üretimi: Sosyal Medya, Enformasyon ve Bilgi
SELİM, F. (2023) · Elektronik Cumhuriyet İletişim Dergisi · doi:10.54089/ecider.1295929 · Cited by 1
The Awkward Moment When You Agree With News Outlets That You Normally Distrust
Blom, R. (2023) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v11i4.7153 · Cited by 1
Bubble reachers and uncivil discourse in polarized online public sphere
Kobellarz, J. K., Broćić, M., Silver, D., & Silva, T. H. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0304564 · Cited by 5
Attitude extremity and perceived argument diversity exposure in the COVID-19 debate
Zerback, T., & Ryffel, Q. (2024) · Studies in Communication and Media · doi:10.5771/2192-4007-2024-2-214 · Cited by 1
Schul, Y., & Ganzach, Y. (2024) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302241264420 · Cited by 1
Shim, H., & Park, J. (2024) · Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies · doi:10.20879/kjjcs.2024.68.5.005
Digital Economy and Digital Divide
Lombardi, M. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-32152-8_48 · Cited by 1
Huang, Y.-T., Wang, T.-H., & Lee, W.-T. (2025) · Trends in Psychology · doi:10.1007/s43076-024-00433-9 · Cited by 1
Stier, S., Siegers, P., & Breuer, J. (2024) · European Sociological Review · doi:10.1093/esr/jcae051 · Cited by 7
An experimental study of the effect of the news source on the dissemination of fake news
Mesquita, E., Lopes, E. L., Ribeiro, T. D. L. S., Vidal, D., & da Cunha, J. A. C. (2025) · RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie · doi:10.1590/1678-6971/eramg250192 · Cited by 1
Yamamoto, M., & Chang, C.-H. (2025) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/00936502251343980 · Cited by 1
Dissemination of false information and societal polarization: an empirical investigation
Choudhary, P. K., Chakradhar, J., & Poola, D. (2025) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2025.2519053 · Cited by 1
Xiao, S., Ye, Q., & Chen, Y. (2025) · Aslib Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1108/ajim-08-2024-0644 · Cited by 1
Incels vs. Femcels: Dissecting the Gendered Realities of Involuntary Celibacy
Pasciuto, F., & Pizzimenti, D. M. (2025) · Comunicación y Género · doi:10.5209/cgen.99350 · Cited by 1
Zhang, Z. (2025) · SHS Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/shsconf/202522004023 · Cited by 3
Masood, M., & Ahmed, S. (2025) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edaf046 · Cited by 1
Gill, H., Lee, H., Kim, S. Y., Liao, X., & Rojas, H. (2025) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edaf053 · Cited by 1
Political Tolerance and Forms of Active News Avoidance
Lee, F. L. F., Chan, C. K., & Tang, G. K. Y. (2025) · Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/1461670x.2025.2590559 · Cited by 1
Choi, S., Liu, A., Lee, S. E., Yoon, H.-C., & Kam, J. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-06398-z · Cited by 2
Adversarial Perturbations Maximization in Online Social Networks
Mao, D., Wu, W., & Du, D. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Networking · doi:10.1109/ton.2025.3646453 · Cited by 1
Gopalakrishna, V., Venugopal, K., & Gudla, S. P. K. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-5307-4.ch002 · Cited by 1
Ahmed, S., Ng, S. W. T., Deng, R., & Bee, A. W. T. (2026) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2025.2609120 · Cited by 1
Xu, J., Liu, C., & Lu, L. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16010112 · Cited by 1
Winners’ Restraint or Affective Majoritarianism? Elections, Polarization and Political Support
Tomic, D., Ferrer, S., Prada, E., & Hernández, E. (2026) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/00104140251414013 · Cited by 1
Wu-Ouyang, B. (2026) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1093/ct/qtag002 · Cited by 1
Echo chambers can emerge without algorithmic personalization or a preference for homogeneity
Törnberg, P. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0347207 · Cited by 1
Kwok, C. (2026) · Philosophy & Social Criticism · doi:10.1177/01914537261449770 · Cited by 2
Quantifying opinion homophily in online social networks from a bounded confidence perspective
Luan, Y., Ancona, C., Bernardo, C., Pansanella, V., Iudice, F. L., Rossetti, G., Vasca, F., Wu, X., & Altafini, C. (2026) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-026-02760-y · Cited by 2
Is Information Verification Just a Matter of Intellectual Humility?
Sportelli, C., Cicirelli, P. G., Corbelli, G., Paciello, M., & D’Errico, F. (2026) · Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications · doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000512 · Cited by 1
Wu-Ouyang, B. (2026) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/19401612261489041 · Cited by 1
Johnson, T. J., Bichard, S. L., & Zhang, W. (2011) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-61350-338-6.ch010 · Cited by 1
The Manifestations of Generosity: From Cooperation to Social Justice
Herzog, P. S. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-26500-7_2 · Cited by 2
Guinibert, M., & Nairn, A. (2020) · Advances in religious and cultural studies (ARCS) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-4829-5.ch008 · Cited by 1
Jungherr, A. M., Rivero, G., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108297820.009 · Cited by 1
La plateformisation des médias français et le ton du débat public
Lyubareva, I., Mésangeau, J., Boudjani, N., Badisy, I. E., & Brisson, L. (2021) · Communication · doi:10.4000/communication.14433 · Cited by 1
Soziale Medien in der politischen Kommunikation
Emmer, M. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-03895-3_5-1 · Cited by 1
Wolfsfeld, G., Sheafer, T., & Althaus, S. L. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197634998.003.0002 · Cited by 1
Co-Activity Maximization in Online Social Networks
Mao, D., Wu, W., & Du, D. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2022.3213260 · Cited by 1
Aruguete, N., & Calvo, E. F. (2022) · Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico · doi:10.5209/esmp.82831 · Cited by 6
Análisis del uso de medios y creación de comunidades virtuales alrededor del caso #Frena en México
Robles, A. D. J. L. (2023) · Contratexto · doi:10.26439/contratexto2023.n39.6060 · Cited by 1
The Effect of Increasing Number of Topics to Polarization and Echo Chambers on SNS
Nagura, T., & Akiyama, E. (2023) · Transactions of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1527/tjsai.38-4_b-n11 · Cited by 1
Buturoiu, R., Corbu, N., & Boţan, M. (2023) · Springer studies in media and political communication · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-41954-6_6 · Cited by 1
Inequalities in Online Representation: Who Follows Their Own Member of Congress on Twitter?
McCabe, S., Green, J., Goel, P., & Lazer, D. M. J. (2023) · Journal of Quantitative Description Digital Media · doi:10.51685/jqd.2023.021 · Cited by 1
Modelling the user polarization of echo chambers, using network science methods
Szilágyi, G. A. (2023) · IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Informatics (CINTI) · doi:10.1109/cinti59972.2023.10381896 · Cited by 1
Social media as a behavior depolarizer: evidence from Russia–Ukraine conflict
Yadav, J., Singh, K., Rana, N. P., & Dennehy, D. (2024) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-12-2022-0972 · Cited by 3
Reid, C. M. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-49084-2_7 · Cited by 1
Dinamica dezinformării. Impactul camerelor de ecou în modelarea opiniei publice online din România
Stoica, S. E. (2024) · Buletinul Universității Naționale de Apărare „Carol I” · doi:10.53477/2065-8281-24-04 · Cited by 1
Research on risk assessment model and simulation of online group polarization in emergencies
Lu, G., & Liu, F. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0305552 · Cited by 1
Huang, M. (2024) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.13431 · Cited by 1
Arman, Z. R. (2024) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/08944393241286149 · Cited by 1
Artificial Intelligence and Information Bubbles
Lapchit, S., Suktam, W., Supsin, J., & Kenaphoom, S. (2024) · Practice, progress, and proficiency in sustainability · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-7989-9.ch009 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Garrett, R. K.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Garrett, R. Kelly
- ORCID
- Garrett, R. Kelly
- Venue
- Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 265-285
- ISSN
- 1083-6101 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137809006
- Cited by
- 1,040
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 64 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 120 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 45.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
- Keywords
- selective exposure, echo chambers, online news, political information, political polarization, news avoidance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
