Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 601

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reduced expression of Dicer associated with poor prognosis in lung cancer patients

Open access
Karube, Yoko, Tanaka, Hisaaki, Osada, Hirotaka, Tomida, Shuta, Tatematsu, Yoshio, Yanagisawa, Kiyoshi, Yatabe, Yasushi, Takamizawa, Junichi, Miyoshi, Shinichiro, Mitsudomi, Tetsuya, Takahashi, Takashi·2005·Cancer Science

Abstract

Emerging evidence suggests that microRNA, which are well‐conserved, abundant and small regulatory RNA, may be involved in the pathogenesis of human cancers. We recently reported that expression of let‐7 was frequently reduced in lung cancers, and that reduced let‐7 expression was significantly associated with shorter patient survival. Two members of the double‐stranded RNA‐specific endonuclease family, Dicer and Drosha, convert precursor forms of microRNA into their mature forms using a stepwise process. In the present study, we examined expression levels of these genes in 67 non‐small cell lung cancer cases, and found for the first time that Dicer expression levels were reduced in a fraction of lung cancers with a significant prognostic impact on the survival of surgically treated cases. It should be noted that multivariate COX regression analysis showed that the prognostic impact of Dicer (P = 0.001) appears to be independent of disease stage (P = 0.001), while logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the higher incidence of reduced Dicer expression in poorly differentiated tumors remained significant even after correction for other parameters (P = 0.02). Given the fundamental and multiple biological roles of Dicer in various cellular processes, our results suggest the involvement of reduced Dicer expression in the development of lung cancers, thus warranting further investigations of the underlying mechanisms, which can be expected to enhance understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of this fatal cancer. (Cancer Sci 2005; 96: 111–115)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2005.00015.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 601

Metadata

Authors
Karube, Y., Tanaka, H., Osada, H., Tomida, S., Tatematsu, Y., Yanagisawa, K., Yatabe, Y., Takamizawa, J., Miyoshi, S., Mitsudomi, T., & Takahashi, T.
Venue
Cancer Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-02
Volume
96
Issue
2
Pages
111-115
ISSN
  • 1347-9032 (ISSN-L)
  • 1349-7006
OpenAlex
W1991563094
Cited by
601
References
4
FWCI
10.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reduced expression of Dicer associated with poor prognosis in lung cancer patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2005.00015.x
The paper
Karube, Y., Tanaka, H., Osada, H., Tomida, S., Tatematsu, Y., Yanagisawa, K., Yatabe, Y., Takamizawa, J., Miyoshi, S., Mitsudomi, T., & Takahashi, T. (2005). Reduced expression of Dicer associated with poor prognosis in lung cancer patients. Cancer Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2005.00015.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.